Legal Remedies for Withheld Salary and Defamation by Employers in the Philippines

Below is a comprehensive overview of the relevant laws, legal principles, and remedies available in the Philippines regarding withheld salaries and defamation by employers. This discussion is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Individuals seeking legal remedies should consult a licensed Philippine attorney or contact the relevant government agencies for guidance.

I. Introduction

Employers in the Philippines have specific obligations under Philippine law to pay their employees all earned salaries and wages in a prompt manner. Failure to fulfill these obligations can lead to administrative, civil, and even criminal liability. Likewise, when an employer makes derogatory or false statements that harm an employee’s reputation, legal remedies for defamation may be available.

This article explores (1) the legal framework on withheld salaries, (2) permissible deductions (if any), (3) remedies available to employees, and (4) the laws on defamation—both criminal and civil—pertaining to employers’ statements about employees.

II. Withholding of Salaries or Wages

A. Legal Framework

  1. Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442)

    • The Labor Code contains detailed provisions on wage and hour laws.
    • Article 116 (formerly Article 116 in older numbering) of the Labor Code explicitly states that it is unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, to withhold any amount from the wages of a worker except as allowed by law.

  2. Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRRs)

    • The Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) issues policies and regulations for practical enforcement of the Labor Code, including rules on payment of wages, wage protection, and remedies for violations.

  3. Civil Code of the Philippines

    • Under certain circumstances, employers who withhold salaries without lawful justification could also be liable under the Civil Code for damages (including moral and exemplary damages), subject to proof of malice or bad faith.

B. Permissible Deductions

Although withholding wages is generally prohibited, there are specific exceptions under the Labor Code and related regulations:

  1. Mandatory Government Contributions and Taxes

    • Employers are permitted—and required—to deduct taxes, Social Security System (SSS) contributions, PhilHealth, and Pag-IBIG Fund contributions from an employee’s wages.

  2. Insurance Premiums and Union Dues

    • Deductions for premiums to company-sponsored insurance plans or union dues (for union members) can be lawful if authorized by law, regulations, or written agreement.

  3. Authorized Salary Deductions

    • Certain salary deductions may be allowed if expressly authorized by the employee in writing and if the deductions benefit the employee directly (e.g., salary loans from SSS or Pag-IBIG, or company loans provided such deductions comply with legal requirements).

  4. Wage Offsetting for Liabilities

    • Generally, wage offsets for liabilities (e.g., property damage caused by the employee) require observance of due process. Employers cannot arbitrarily deduct amounts without proper notice and the employee’s express agreement or a court/NLRC/DOLE order.

C. Common Violations Leading to Salary Withholding

  1. Disputes over Resignation or Separation

    • Some employers withhold final pay and other benefits, claiming alleged debts or liabilities. However, unless those claims are proven through lawful processes, withholding pay in its entirety is prohibited.

  2. Retaliation or Punishment

    • Employers sometimes withhold salaries as punishment for perceived employee misconduct. This is generally illegal unless there is a clear, lawful basis (e.g., to enforce a disciplinary penalty imposed according to company rules and consistent with due process).

  3. Financial Difficulty of the Company

    • Financial struggles of an employer do not excuse non-payment of salaries. Employees have a preferential right to be paid wages under Philippine law.

III. Legal Remedies for Withheld Salary

  1. Conciliation and Mediation (Single Entry Approach or “SENA”)

    • Before filing a formal complaint, employees can avail themselves of the SENA program administered by the DOLE.
    • It provides a 30-day mandatory conciliation period to settle claims quickly and inexpensively.

  2. Filing a Wage Complaint with DOLE

    • For unpaid or withheld salaries, employees can file a complaint with the DOLE’s Regional Office.
    • DOLE labor inspectors can investigate and issue compliance orders directing the employer to pay back wages.

  3. National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) Case

    • If settlement via SENA fails or if the dispute exceeds the jurisdictional amount (generally above PHP 5,000 or involves reinstatement), employees can file an illegal withholding of wages (or money claim) case before the NLRC.
    • The NLRC can order payment of withheld salaries, plus potential damages and attorney’s fees.

  4. Civil Action for Damages

    • In certain situations, employees may institute a civil case for damages under the Civil Code if the withholding of salary was done in bad faith or with malice.
    • This can include moral and exemplary damages, as well as attorney’s fees.

  5. Criminal Liability

    • Although less commonly pursued, an employer who persistently and maliciously refuses to pay wages due may, in some extreme cases, face criminal prosecution under the Revised Penal Code (for estafa or other relevant provisions), or under specific labor laws if the non-payment meets the threshold of criminal wrongdoing.

IV. Defamation by Employers

A. Defining Defamation under Philippine Law

  1. Criminal Defamation (Libel and Slander)

    • Under the Revised Penal Code (RPC), defamation is a public and malicious imputation of a crime, vice, or defect, or any act, omission, or condition that tends to cause dishonor, discredit, or contempt against another person.
    • Libel is defamation committed by means of writing, printing, or similar mediums (Article 353, in relation to Articles 354 and 355, RPC).
    • Slander is oral defamation (Articles 358 and 359, RPC).

  2. Civil Defamation

    • The Civil Code of the Philippines allows an injured party to recover damages for defamation, even if there is no criminal prosecution. The aggrieved party may claim moral damages (Article 2219[7], Civil Code) if defamation is proven.

B. Common Scenarios of Employer Defamation

  1. Negative References to Prospective Employers

    • When an employer provides false or malicious statements about a former employee to new employers.

  2. False Allegations of Misconduct

    • Publicly accusing an employee of theft, fraud, or other serious misconduct without basis or evidence.

  3. Character Smear Campaign

    • Employers might spread rumors or false information to other employees or third parties to harm an employee’s reputation.

C. Elements of a Defamation Case

  1. Imputation of a Discreditable Act or Omission

    • The statement must claim the employee committed some wrongdoing or vice.

  2. Publication or Communication to Third Persons

    • The false statement must be shared with someone other than the employee (e.g., co-workers, external parties, or posted publicly).

  3. Malice

    • There must be malice (implied or actual). Malice is presumed in most libel or slander cases, although this presumption can be rebutted by proving good intention or justifiable motive.

  4. Identifiability of the Victim

    • The defamatory statement must clearly pertain to the employee (i.e., the employee is identifiable).

D. Legal Remedies for Defamation

  1. Criminal Complaint for Libel or Slander

    • The injured employee may file a complaint before the Office of the City or Provincial Prosecutor. If probable cause is found, criminal charges may be brought against the employer.

  2. Civil Action for Damages

    • An aggrieved employee may file a separate civil suit (or join it with the criminal complaint) to recover actual, moral, or even exemplary damages under Articles 19, 20, 21, and 2219 of the Civil Code.
    • Note that even if the criminal case does not prosper, a civil case may still be pursued based on the concept of abuse of rights or quasi-delict.

  3. Administrative Remedies (in Limited Cases)

    • If the defamation is also tied to an unfair labor practice (e.g., harassment of union members), the employee may file a complaint with the DOLE or the NLRC under the labor laws.
    • However, defamation alone typically goes beyond the jurisdiction of the labor tribunal unless intertwined with labor issues such as illegal dismissal, harassment, or discrimination.

E. Defenses Available to Employers

  1. Truth of the Statement

    • If the allegedly defamatory statement is proven true and made without malice, it can be a defense to libel/slander.

  2. Qualified Privilege

    • Statements made in the performance of legal, moral, or social duty (e.g., giving a truthful reference to a prospective employer) may be considered privileged, so long as they are not made with malice.

  3. Absence of Publication

    • If the statement was never communicated to a third party, defamation cannot generally be established.

V. Practical Steps for Employees

  1. Document Everything

    • Keep a paper trail of payslips, demand letters, emails, and any communication showing the withholding of salaries or the defamatory statements.

  2. Seek Conciliation

    • Many wage disputes are resolved quickly through SENA or mediation at DOLE.

  3. Consult a Lawyer

    • A labor attorney can evaluate whether to proceed before the NLRC, the regular courts, or both.

  4. File a Complaint Promptly

    • For withheld wages, time is of the essence to recover money claims. In defamation, criminal libel or slander have prescriptive periods (generally one year for oral defamation and one year for libel), so timely filing is crucial.

  5. Preserve Evidence of Defamation

    • Save screenshots, emails, witness statements, or any proof that the employer published defamatory remarks.

VI. Conclusion

In the Philippine legal context, employees have robust protections against unjust withholding of wages and defamatory actions by employers. The Labor Code, its implementing rules, and the Revised Penal Code provide mechanisms for employees to seek redress. Employees should be mindful of their options, from administrative recourse before the DOLE or the NLRC to civil or criminal actions.

Ultimately, consultation with a licensed Philippine attorney remains the best step to evaluate specific cases, navigate evidentiary requirements, and choose the most appropriate and timely legal strategy.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login