Requesting a Notice to File Action in Barangay Mediation

Below is a comprehensive discussion of the topic “Requesting a Notice to File Action in Barangay Mediation,” situated in Philippine law and practice. The terms “Notice to File Action,” “Certificate to File Action,” and “Certification to File Action” are often used interchangeably. The most common term in jurisprudence and practice is “Certification to File Action” or “Certificate to File Action.” Nonetheless, the essence and procedure remain the same.

1. Overview of the Katarungang Pambarangay (Barangay Justice System)

  1. Legal Basis

    • The Katarungang Pambarangay system is governed primarily by:
      • Presidential Decree (P.D.) No. 1508 (the original law on the barangay conciliation system, though now supplanted by provisions in the Local Government Code).
      • Republic Act (R.A.) No. 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government Code of 1991, specifically Chapter 7 (Sections 399-422).
    • The system aims to provide an alternative, community-based mechanism for dispute resolution to unclog the regular courts and to encourage amicable settlement at the grassroots level.

  2. Lupon Tagapamayapa

    • Each barangay has a Lupon Tagapamayapa (“Lupon”) composed of the Punong Barangay (Barangay Chairperson) as the Lupon Chairman and appointed members who facilitate conciliation and mediation.
    • For each dispute, a Pangkat ng Tagapagsundo (a conciliation panel) may be formed to handle the mediation if initial efforts by the Lupon Chair fail.

  3. Scope of Katarungang Pambarangay

    • The dispute must generally be civil in nature or a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment not exceeding one (1) year or a fine not exceeding Five Thousand Pesos (₱5,000).
    • The parties must generally be residents of the same city or municipality and the matter must not be among the exceptions (e.g., offenses with penalty exceeding one year, real properties situated in different localities, offenses against national security, etc.).

2. What Is a “Notice to File Action” or “Certificate to File Action”?

  1. Definition and Purpose

    • In the context of barangay conciliation, a “Notice to File Action” (or more formally, “Certificate to File Action” or “Certification to File Action”) is a formal document issued by the Lupon Secretary (typically signed by the Punong Barangay or the Lupon Chair) indicating that the dispute was not settled at the barangay level.
    • This document allows the complainant to take the case to court (or to a relevant government office, if the dispute requires an administrative remedy).

  2. When It Is Required

    • Before filing certain civil or criminal cases in court, parties are mandated to undergo conciliation/mediation at the barangay level if the dispute falls within the jurisdiction of the Lupon.
    • If conciliation or mediation fails, is not feasible, or falls under an exception to the Lupon’s jurisdiction, the barangay issues the Certificate to File Action. This certificate is prerequisite evidence that the case passed through or was excepted from the barangay system. Without it, the court will likely dismiss or stay the proceedings for failure to comply with the Katarungang Pambarangay requirement.

3. Grounds and Circumstances for Issuing a Notice/Certificate to File Action

  1. Failure of Amicable Settlement

    • If, after several mediation or conciliation sessions, the parties do not reach an agreement, the Lupon or Pangkat will formally declare the mediation a failure and issue the Certificate to File Action.

  2. Non-appearance or Refusal to Participate

    • If the respondent (the party complained against) refuses to appear or participate in mediation, or deliberately obstructs the conciliation process, the Lupon may terminate the proceedings and issue the Certificate to File Action.

  3. Conflict of Jurisdiction

    • If the Lupon determines that the case is not within the barangay’s jurisdiction (e.g., the possible penalty is beyond one year of imprisonment, or the parties reside in different cities or municipalities under certain circumstances), the Lupon may issue a Certificate to File Action without conducting further mediation.

  4. Other Circumstances

    • The law also specifies other scenarios where prior barangay conciliation is not required (e.g., when the dispute involves a public officer with official functions, or urgent cases needing immediate legal action). In these exceptions, the Lupon may issue a certification that the dispute is exempt from barangay conciliation, or the complainant may directly file in court (depending on the nature of the exception).

4. Procedure for Requesting a Notice/Certificate to File Action

  1. Filing the Complaint with the Barangay

    • The complainant or aggrieved party files a complaint—often a simple written letter or a form provided by the barangay—at the Office of the Lupon Chairman (the Punong Barangay).

  2. Conciliation / Mediation Proceedings

    • The Punong Barangay will schedule mediation sessions.
    • If mediation by the Punong Barangay fails, the dispute is referred to the Pangkat ng Tagapagsundo, which will attempt conciliation.

  3. Issuance of the Certificate

    • If no settlement is reached, or one of the recognized grounds arises (refusal to participate, lack of jurisdiction, etc.):
      1. The complainant (or sometimes the respondent, depending on the need) requests from the Punong Barangay or Lupon Secretary that the dispute be terminated and a Certificate to File Action be issued.
      2. The Lupon, after reviewing the record of proceedings, issues a Certificate to File Action (signed by the Punong Barangay or Lupon Secretary on behalf of the Lupon).
    • Legally, this certificate must contain the details of the dispute, the fact that mediation/conciliation was attempted but failed or was rendered moot, and an authorization for the complainant to file the case with the proper court or office.

  4. Filing in Court

    • The complainant appends the Certificate to File Action (if mandatory) to the complaint in a judicial or quasi-judicial body. This step fulfills the requirement under Sections 412 and 413 of R.A. 7160 (the Local Government Code) and prior jurisprudence.

5. Timing and Important Deadlines

  1. Mandatory Time Frames for Mediation

    • Under the law, the entire conciliation process at the barangay level has to be concluded within a specific timeframe (often up to 30 days from the date the Pangkat is convened), though it may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties.

  2. When to Request the Certificate

    • Typically, the certificate is requested after the mediation efforts are concluded unsuccessfully, or as soon as the Lupon is convinced the dispute cannot be settled or is outside its jurisdiction.

  3. Validity

    • Although the law does not explicitly provide a strict “expiration” for the Certificate to File Action, it is best practice to file the case in court within a reasonable period after issuance to avoid questions about subsequent attempts at settlement or changes in the dispute’s status.

6. Common Issues and Practical Tips

  1. Document Everything

    • When attending mediation sessions, ensure that each appearance, attempt at settlement, and any refusal to appear is documented in the barangay records. This record is crucial if the other party challenges the Certificate or if the court requires evidence of the failed settlement.

  2. Exceptions to Barangay Conciliation

    • Not all disputes require a barangay conciliation. Some are automatically exempt (e.g., labor disputes cognizable by the Labor Arbiters, agrarian disputes under the jurisdiction of the DARAB, or in cases where immediate court relief like a temporary restraining order is needed).
    • In these scenarios, request the barangay for a “Certificate of Exemption” or clarify that no Certificate to File Action is required.

  3. Refusal or Failure of Respondent to Participate

    • A party’s deliberate absence can lead to the issuance of a Certificate to File Action. However, a strategic or “bad-faith” refusal might carry consequences (e.g., the respondent’s potential liability for costs or moral damages, depending on the circumstances). Nonetheless, the primary effect is that the conciliation does not proceed, and the complainant is free to go to court.

  4. Effects of an Amicable Settlement

    • If a settlement is successfully reached at the barangay level, it has the force and effect of a final decision of the court if duly notarized or affirmed. In that case, no Certificate to File Action is needed since there is no more basis to file a case in court unless the settlement is later breached.

7. Legal Implications of Not Securing the Certificate to File Action

  1. Dismissal of the Case

    • For disputes covered by the Katarungang Pambarangay system, lack of a Certificate to File Action is a ground for the court to dismiss the case without prejudice, or to refer the parties back to the barangay for conciliation.

  2. Jurisdictional Requirement

    • Courts strictly enforce this rule to ensure compliance with the Local Government Code’s policy of encouraging barangay settlement. It is a jurisdictional prerequisite in many civil or minor criminal cases involving parties from the same city or municipality.

  3. Additional Costs and Delay

    • Failure to comply can cause delays (as the court may order the parties back to the barangay), result in added legal costs, and hamper the efficient resolution of the dispute.

8. Sample Outline of Steps for a Complainant

  1. Draft a Letter-Complaint

    • State the facts of the dispute, identify the respondent, and address it to the Punong Barangay.

  2. Submit to Barangay

    • File the letter-complaint with the Barangay Hall where the respondent resides or where the dispute arose (depending on the specific rule on venue).

  3. Attend Mediation/Conciliation Sessions

    • Cooperate in the scheduled sessions. Bring relevant documents or witnesses if needed.

  4. Monitor Compliance by the Other Party

    • If the respondent does not appear, request that the Lupon note the non-appearance.

  5. Request the Certificate to File Action

    • If the dispute fails to settle or falls outside barangay jurisdiction, formally request the issuance of the Certificate to File Action.

  6. Proceed to Court

    • Attach the Certificate to File Action to the complaint to be filed in the appropriate court (Municipal Trial Court, Regional Trial Court, etc., depending on the nature and amount/penalty of the dispute).

9. Conclusion

“Requesting a Notice to File Action in Barangay Mediation” (commonly referred to as a “Certificate to File Action” or “Certification to File Action”) is a crucial step in many Philippine legal disputes. It ensures parties first exhaust conciliatory mechanisms at the barangay level, in line with the spirit of the Katarungang Pambarangay system, which promotes amicable settlement and decongestion of court dockets.

Understanding:

  • Which disputes require barangay mediation,
  • How the mediation process unfolds, and
  • When and how to secure the Certificate to File Action

are essential to pursuing a case effectively in court. Failure to comply with the requirement for barangay conciliation, when applicable, typically results in procedural delays or dismissal of the case. On the other hand, successful compliance either helps achieve an early and cost-effective resolution in the barangay or, if conciliation fails, provides a clear path to escalate the matter to the judicial system with the required certification in hand.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login