Revenge Porn Threats Legal Remedies

Disclaimer: The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and their interpretation may change over time, and individual circumstances vary. For specific advice regarding your situation, consult a licensed attorney in the Philippines.


Revenge Porn Threats: Legal Remedies in the Philippine Context

I. Introduction

In the digital age, the non-consensual sharing—or the threat to share—intimate images or videos, commonly referred to as “revenge porn,” has become a significant concern. Although the term “revenge porn” is not explicitly used in Philippine statutes, various laws provide avenues to penalize and seek redress against individuals who threaten to or actually share private sexual content without consent.

This article provides an overview of the legal framework, relevant statutes, and remedies available to victims in the Philippines.


II. Understanding “Revenge Porn Threats”

Revenge porn generally refers to the distribution of sexually explicit images or videos of an individual without their consent, often by a current or former partner. In many cases, perpetrators may threaten to release these private materials to blackmail, harass, intimidate, or exact “revenge.”

Although Philippine laws do not specifically use the term “revenge porn,” the act (or threat of the act) of sharing intimate content without consent can fall under various offenses, such as:

  1. Violation of the Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 (Republic Act No. 9995)
  2. Cybercrime offenses under the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10175)
  3. Violence Against Women and Their Children Act of 2004 (Republic Act No. 9262), if committed within an intimate or dating relationship.
  4. Grave Threats, Light Threats, or other relevant offenses under the Revised Penal Code, if applicable.
  5. Gender-based electronic violence under the Safe Spaces Act (Republic Act No. 11313), in certain contexts.

III. Key Philippine Laws Applicable to Revenge Porn Threats

1. Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 (RA 9995)

RA 9995 is the primary law addressing unauthorized recording and sharing of private images or videos. Key points include:

  • Prohibited Acts:

    • Capturing an image of a person’s private area, or taking photo or video of sexual acts, without consent.
    • Copying, reproducing, or sharing such images or recordings without the subject’s consent—even if the original recording was done with consent.
    • Selling, distributing, publishing, or broadcasting such content without the subject’s consent.
  • Threatened Acts:

    • While RA 9995 clearly criminalizes the actual act of sharing, a threat to distribute may still be prosecuted if it involves an overt act or attempted distribution, or if it forms part of harassment or blackmail.
    • In many instances, even threatening to distribute intimate content can be considered a form of psychological violence or blackmail under other statutes, such as RA 9262 or under the Revised Penal Code provisions on threats.
  • Penalties:

    • Imprisonment of not less than three (3) years but not more than seven (7) years, and a fine of not less than P100,000 but not more than P500,000, depending on the offense.

2. Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (RA 10175)

RA 10175 defines and punishes crimes committed through information and communications technologies (ICT). While not specifically mentioning “revenge porn,” it can enhance penalties and provide additional legal grounds for acts involving:

  • Cyber-related offenses: If intimate content is distributed or threatened to be distributed through social media, messaging apps, or other online channels, the act may be classified as a cybercrime.
  • Online Libel or Cyber Libel: If the perpetrator uses intimate material to attack a victim’s character or reputation online, it may constitute cyber libel (though the elements of libel must still be established).
  • Unlawful or prohibited acts including photo or video voyeurism: The law references RA 9995, making any violation done via ICT subject to the penalties under the Cybercrime Prevention Act, often imposing one degree higher penalty than the original law prescribes.

3. Violence Against Women and Their Children Act (RA 9262)

RA 9262 covers physical, sexual, psychological, and economic abuse against women and their children within an intimate relationship (e.g., husband-wife, former or current dating relationship, or with a child in common). Threatening to distribute intimate images can be prosecuted under the law’s provisions on “psychological violence,” defined as:

  • Psychological violence involves acts or omissions causing mental or emotional suffering, such as intimidation, harassment, stalking, damage to property, public ridicule, or repeated verbal abuse.

If a partner or ex-partner uses threats of exposing intimate materials to cause emotional or mental distress, this can be deemed psychological abuse under RA 9262. Conviction can lead to imprisonment and fines.

4. Grave Threats or Light Threats under the Revised Penal Code

If an offender threatens a victim with harm—such as exposing intimate content—to coerce or intimidate them, it might be prosecuted under the Revised Penal Code provisions on:

  • Grave Threats (Article 282): Threatening another with the infliction of a wrong amounting to a crime.
  • Light Threats (Article 283): Threatening another with a harm not constituting a crime, but done to cause alarm or annoyance.

The precise classification depends on the nature of the threat (including whether the threatened act itself is criminal and the gravity of the intimidation).

5. Safe Spaces Act (RA 11313)

The Safe Spaces Act, also known as the “Bawal Bastos” Law, penalizes gender-based sexual harassment in public spaces, workplaces, educational or training institutions, and online. It includes “gender-based online sexual harassment,” which may cover:

  • Acts that use information and communications technology to terrorize and intimidate victims through physical, psychological, and emotional threats.
  • This law underscores that harassment—especially if it is sexual in nature—committed through online platforms can be punished. Revenge porn threats may be interpreted as a form of cyber sexual harassment or online gender-based violence.

IV. Legal Remedies and Courses of Action

Victims of revenge porn threats in the Philippines have several remedies and steps they can take:

  1. Gather Evidence

    • Save any messages, emails, screenshots, or call logs that document the threat.
    • Preserve URLs or any relevant digital footprint that can help prove the perpetrator’s actions or intentions.
  2. File a Complaint at Law Enforcement Agencies

    • Philippine National Police (PNP) – Women and Children Protection Center (WCPC): If the offender is a current or former partner, or if children are involved, WCPC is equipped to handle complaints under RA 9262.
    • PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group: For cyber-related threats (social media, messaging apps), you can file a complaint directly with the PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group.
    • National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) – Cybercrime Division: Another avenue for cyber-related offenses. Provide all the evidence of the threat.
  3. Pursue Criminal Charges

    • Depending on the specifics, the victim (with the assistance of a lawyer or public prosecutor) may file charges under RA 9995, RA 9262 (if applicable), or the Revised Penal Code for threats or blackmail. If online platforms are used, RA 10175 (Cybercrime Prevention Act) may apply.
  4. Protection Orders (for Intimate Partner Cases)

    • Under RA 9262, victims of intimate partner violence or threats can apply for a Temporary Protection Order (TPO) or Permanent Protection Order (PPO) to restrain the offender from further harassing or threatening them.
  5. Civil Remedies

    • Civil damages: Victims can file a separate civil case for damages for the emotional distress and harm caused by the perpetrator’s threats. This can include moral damages and possibly exemplary damages, depending on the circumstances.
  6. Online Takedown or Content Removal

    • If the content is already posted or shared online, victims may request platforms (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, YouTube) for immediate takedown under the platform’s community standards.
    • While takedown requests do not substitute legal action, they can mitigate harm.
  7. Seek Support

    • Contact NGOs or women’s rights organizations for counseling and legal support.
    • The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) and local government units (e.g., city or municipal social welfare offices) may provide assistance and guidance.

V. Important Considerations

  1. Consent to Record vs. Consent to Distribute

    • Even if an individual initially consented to being photographed or recorded, that does not equate to consenting to the distribution of that content. Under RA 9995, sharing intimate photos or videos without explicit consent is punishable.
  2. Privacy Rights

    • The Philippine Constitution and the Supreme Court recognize an individual’s right to privacy and the inviolability of private communications, which further strengthens the legal standing of victims seeking redress.
  3. Gender and Relationship Dynamics

    • If the threat comes from a spouse, ex-spouse, or partner, RA 9262’s provisions on psychological violence can be a potent remedy.
    • If the offender is merely an online contact, friend, or unknown person, RA 9995, RA 10175, the Safe Spaces Act, and the Revised Penal Code provisions on threats or coercion may still apply.
  4. Aggravating Circumstances

    • Under RA 10175, crimes committed by means of ICT may increase penalties (one degree higher) compared to the penalties under older laws like RA 9995.
  5. Time and Costs

    • Pursuing legal action entails potentially lengthy proceedings, costs for litigation, and emotional strain. Nonetheless, the law provides multiple options for redress, and there are government agencies and pro bono legal services that may assist victims.

VI. Conclusion

“Revenge porn threats” constitute a grave intrusion into an individual’s privacy and dignity, carrying severe emotional, psychological, and social repercussions. While the term “revenge porn” may not appear verbatim in Philippine statutes, several laws—including RA 9995 (Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act), RA 10175 (Cybercrime Prevention Act), and RA 9262 (Anti-VAWC Act)—collectively offer robust legal remedies to hold perpetrators accountable.

Victims have multiple options to seek justice: from filing criminal cases to securing protection orders and civil damages. The key to a successful legal remedy is prompt action, thorough documentation, and seeking professional guidance from law enforcement agencies and legal practitioners. With the increasing awareness and stronger enforcement of existing laws, the Philippines continues to enhance its legal frameworks to protect individuals from privacy violations and digital abuse.


If you or someone you know is experiencing threats related to revenge porn, you are encouraged to:

  1. Preserve all evidence (screenshots, messages, etc.).
  2. Report immediately to the authorities (PNP, NBI).
  3. Seek legal counsel from a lawyer, a legal aid organization, or the Public Attorney’s Office (PAO).
  4. Reach out for emotional and social support from trusted individuals or organizations experienced in handling gender-based violence and online harassment.

Remember: The law is on your side, and multiple agencies are now equipped to handle cyber-related abuses and threats. No one should be subjected to intimidation or violation of their privacy, and legal recourse is available to protect and uphold your rights.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.