Statute of Limitations on Credit Card Debt

Below is a comprehensive discussion of the statute of limitations on credit card debt in the Philippines. This information is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific concerns or individual cases, please consult a qualified attorney.


1. Overview of the Statute of Limitations in the Philippines

In Philippine law, the statute of limitations (also called “prescription”) refers to the time limit within which a creditor or lender must file a lawsuit in court to enforce a debt. Once this period has lapsed without any legal action taken, the debt becomes unenforceable in court (i.e., prescribed).

The principal legal provisions on prescription can be found in the New Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386, as amended), mainly under Articles 1144 to 1155.


2. General Rule: 10-Year Prescription for Written Contracts

2.1. Legal Basis

  • Article 1144 of the Civil Code provides that actions based on a written contract must be brought within ten (10) years.

    Article 1144: The following actions must be brought within ten years from the time the right of action accrues:
    (1) Upon a written contract;
    (2) Upon an obligation created by law;
    (3) Upon a judgment.

  • Credit card agreements are generally regarded as written contracts because they involve written terms and conditions that cardholders agree to (often through signed application forms or electronic agreements with printout equivalents).

2.2. When the 10-Year Period Starts

Under Philippine jurisprudence, the 10-year period typically begins to run from the time the cause of action arises. In the context of credit card debt:

  1. From the date the obligation became due and demandable – often pegged to the date the monthly statement becomes due.
  2. From last payment or last acknowledgment – if the cardholder makes a partial payment or otherwise acknowledges the debt, the prescriptive period may be counted from that date instead (see also Article 1155).

3. Interruption of Prescription

3.1. Acts That Interrupt the Running of Prescription

  • Article 1155 of the Civil Code governs interruptions of prescription, stating that it is interrupted by:
    1. Filing of a case in court
    2. Written extrajudicial demand by the creditor (e.g., formal demand letters)
    3. Any written acknowledgment of the debt by the debtor (e.g., partial payment, a signed acknowledgment, or a new payment arrangement)

3.2. Effects of Interruption

When prescription is interrupted, the prescriptive period “resets” and starts running again from the date of interruption. For example, if four years have elapsed and the creditor sends a formal written demand, the period may be deemed interrupted, and the creditor gets a “fresh” 10-year period from that point—assuming the credit card agreement is indeed recognized as a written contract.


4. Special Considerations and Common Misconceptions

4.1. Confusion About a 4-Year Prescription

Occasionally, people refer to a four-year prescriptive period for credit card debts, citing the rule for “open accounts” or obligations not based on a written contract. However, credit card agreements are typically deemed to be written contracts, which are subject to the 10-year prescription. A credit card account may appear “open” in a bookkeeping sense, but the underlying contract with the bank or card issuer is written.

4.2. Role of Collection Agencies

Credit card companies often employ collection agencies, which may continue to contact a debtor even if many years have passed. It is important to note:

  • The expiration of the prescriptive period does not automatically erase the debt—it merely prevents the creditor from enforcing it through the courts.
  • Collection attempts can continue outside of court, though debtors have the right to be protected against harassment or unfair collection practices under other laws and regulations (e.g., BSP circulars on unfair collection practices, or the provisions of the Financial Consumer Protection Act).

5. What Happens After 10 Years?

If the credit card debt has truly prescribed:

  1. The creditor loses the judicial remedy to enforce the debt. In other words, the creditor can no longer obtain a court judgment requiring the debtor to pay.
  2. Extra-judicial collection efforts may continue, but cannot be enforced through a court once the claim is time-barred.

That said, prescription is not automatic. The debtor or defendant must raise prescription as a defense in court. If the creditor files a case despite the lapse of 10 years, and the debtor fails to timely invoke prescription in court, the claim can still proceed.


6. Practical Tips for Debtors and Creditors

6.1. For Debtors

  1. Know Your Rights – Familiarize yourself with the prescriptive periods and fair debt collection rules.
  2. Respond Promptly – If you receive a demand letter, consult an attorney if you suspect prescription has already set in, or if you believe there are other defenses.
  3. Maintain Records – Keep copies of billing statements, receipts of payments, and communications from creditors, to accurately track the timeline of when you last paid or acknowledged the debt.

6.2. For Creditors

  1. Act Within the Prescriptive Period – If you intend to enforce a credit card debt in court, initiate legal action or persist with legitimate efforts (including formal demand) before the 10-year window lapses.
  2. Avoid Unfair Practices – Ensure compliance with regulations on debt collection (e.g., avoid harassment, protect confidentiality, and follow Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas and other regulatory guidelines).

7. Key Legal References

  1. Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386)
    • Article 1144(1): 10-year prescription for written contracts
    • Article 1155: Interruption of prescription
  2. Relevant BSP Circulars – Outline acceptable collection practices for financial institutions.
  3. Financial Consumer Protection Act (R.A. No. 11765) – Contains provisions on fair treatment and protection of consumers in financial transactions.

8. Conclusion

In the Philippines, the enforcement of credit card debt in court generally falls under a 10-year prescriptive period, given that credit card agreements are considered written contracts. This 10-year clock typically starts when the debt becomes due and demandable or from the date of the last payment/acknowledgment, and can be interrupted by formal demands or partial payments.

Understanding the statute of limitations is crucial for both debtors and creditors. For debtors, it clarifies defenses available when faced with prolonged or aggressive collection attempts. For creditors, it underscores the need to pursue legitimate collection efforts within the time allowed by law. Nonetheless, each case can be unique, and any specific concerns about applying the prescriptive period should be discussed with a qualified lawyer.


Disclaimer: This discussion is intended for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. If you are dealing with specific concerns about credit card debt or other legal matters, it is strongly recommended to consult with a licensed attorney who can provide guidance tailored to your situation.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.