Termination for Poor Performance in Call Centers

Termination for Poor Performance in Call Centers (Philippine Context)
All You Need to Know

1. Introduction

The Philippines has a robust statutory and jurisprudential framework protecting employees from unlawful termination. Call centers—also referred to as Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) firms—are subject to this legal framework just like all other businesses in the country. Employers must therefore tread carefully in dismissing employees for poor performance, as failure to observe proper procedures and substantiate valid grounds can expose them to wrongful dismissal claims.

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the legal principles, procedural rules, and relevant jurisprudence in the Philippines governing termination for poor performance in call centers.

2. Overview of the Legal Framework

  1. Labor Code of the Philippines

    • The Labor Code (Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended) primarily regulates termination of employment.
    • Under Article 297 (previously Article 282) of the Labor Code, an employer can terminate an employee for “just causes,” including gross and habitual neglect of duties or willful disobedience. While “poor performance” is not explicitly listed, Philippine jurisprudence generally recognizes it under “gross and habitual neglect” if the substandard performance is both serious and repeated, or if it demonstrates inability or refusal to comply with essential job requirements.

  2. Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) Regulations

    • The DOLE’s implementing rules and regulations (IRR) of the Labor Code contain guidelines on proper dismissal procedures.
    • The DOLE also issues labor advisories and opinions clarifying processes for evaluating performance and handling dismissals.

  3. Philippine Jurisprudence

    • Supreme Court decisions have consistently upheld the rule that dismissals must meet both substantive and procedural due process requirements.
    • The substantive aspect requires that the cause for dismissal be real and reasonable (e.g., objectively verifiable poor performance).
    • The procedural aspect requires adherence to the twin-notice rule and the employee’s right to be heard.

3. What Constitutes “Poor Performance”?

“Poor performance” can take many forms in a call center setting. Common metrics include:

  1. Quality Scores. Call center agents are typically graded for every call handled. Metrics might include communication skill, adherence to scripts, and compliance with company or client guidelines.
  2. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Common KPIs include average handling time (AHT), customer satisfaction scores (CSAT), first-call resolution (FCR), and attendance or schedule adherence.
  3. Productivity and Accuracy. For back-office or support roles, productivity may be measured by tasks completed, error rate, and timeliness.

However, mere failure to meet numerical targets does not automatically equate to just cause for dismissal. The deficiency must be shown to be significant, habitual, and directly impacting the business or violating company expectations. Moreover, the employee’s poor performance must usually persist despite coaching, performance improvement plans (PIPs), or other corrective measures.

4. Just Cause for Termination Due to Poor Performance

Under the Labor Code, “poor performance” is not explicitly labeled as a ground for termination. In practice, though, it is often anchored on one (or a combination) of the following recognized just causes:

  1. Gross and Habitual Neglect of Duties

    • Subpar performance can rise to the level of neglect if the employee willfully or repeatedly fails to meet reasonable job standards. This must be supported by documentation showing repeated deficiencies and the employer’s efforts at correction.

  2. Insubordination or Willful Disobedience

    • If the employee’s poor performance can be traced to defiance of company rules or instructions—like failing to follow standard call scripts or refusing to attend training—this can potentially be classified under willful disobedience.

  3. Other Analogous Causes

    • Philippine jurisprudence sometimes accommodates reasons outside the enumerated just causes, as long as they are analogous to those in the Labor Code (Article 297) and are similarly grave or serious. Extreme or persistent underperformance, if proven and properly documented, can fall under this category.

To justify termination, the performance shortfall must be shown to be (a) substantial enough to disrupt normal operations or significantly impair the relationship of trust and confidence; and (b) not just a single or occasional lapse, but a pattern of deficiency without improvement.

5. Procedural Due Process Requirements

Apart from establishing a valid (substantive) ground for termination, employers must adhere to the rules of procedural due process. Failure to do so can render the dismissal illegal, even if the cause is valid. Procedural due process generally entails:

  1. First Written Notice (“Notice to Explain”)

    • The employer must serve a written notice to the employee, stating the specific acts or omissions which warrant dismissal. For performance-based dismissals, this notice typically includes a performance history, metrics, and other relevant documentation.

  2. Opportunity to be Heard

    • After receiving the notice, the employee must be given a chance to explain or defend themselves. A hearing or conference can be scheduled where the employee may respond, present evidence, and refute allegations of poor performance.

  3. Second Written Notice (“Notice of Decision”)

    • After evaluating the employee’s explanation and evidence, the employer must issue a second notice stating the final decision. If the decision is to terminate, it should clearly specify the reasons and factual bases.

Failure to follow the twin-notice rule can lead to the imposition of nominal damages or, in some cases, an order for reinstatement with backwages, depending on the circumstances and the rulings of the labor tribunals or courts.

6. Importance of Documentation

In poor performance cases, documentation is critical to justify dismissal, especially in the call center industry where performance metrics are quantitatively measured. The following documents are commonly used to support a claim of just cause:

  • Performance Reviews & Evaluations
    Records of periodic performance reviews must show how the employee scored on key metrics over time.

  • Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs)
    Employers should ideally give underperforming employees a formal improvement plan with clear expectations, timelines, and support. Records of training, coaching sessions, or mentoring efforts may bolster the employer’s case.

  • Emails or Memos
    Warnings or reminders via email, as well as written records of coaching and feedback sessions, can prove that the employee was made aware of the performance issues and given opportunities to improve.

  • Call Monitoring Reports
    In a call center context, recorded calls and call monitoring forms are often the strongest evidence of an employee’s performance level.

Without strong documentary evidence, a dismissal may be seen as arbitrary and struck down by the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) or the courts.

7. Probationary vs. Regular Employees

  1. Probationary Employees

    • Employers may legally terminate probationary employees who fail to meet prescribed performance standards within the probationary period (generally up to six months, unless extended by agreement or subject to exemptions).
    • However, these standards must be made known at the start of employment, and the dismissal must still comply with due process.

  2. Regular Employees

    • Once employees become regular, they gain security of tenure, meaning they can only be dismissed for just or authorized causes after proper notice and hearing.
    • Employers face a higher burden to prove poor performance as just cause for terminating regular employees.

8. Call Center-Specific Considerations

  1. Night Shifts and Stress Factors

    • The night-shift nature of many call center operations often exposes employees to health issues like fatigue. Employers should ensure that performance metrics do not penalize employees unfairly for health conditions or schedule-related challenges and should allow for reasonable accommodations.

  2. Client-Based Standards

    • Clients often impose specific, sometimes stringent, Service Level Agreements (SLAs). Employers must communicate these standards clearly and demonstrate that the employee repeatedly failed to meet them, despite guidance or training.

  3. Language Proficiency and Accent Neutralization

    • In some cases, employees struggle with accent neutrality or language proficiency. Employers generally must give ample training and opportunity to improve. Sudden termination without a good-faith effort at remediation may be considered unfair.

  4. Rapidly Changing Processes

    • The BPO industry is known for frequent updates in processes, tools, or scripts. Documentation proving that the employee was provided updated procedures and had training opportunities is crucial.

9. Remedies for Wrongful Dismissal

If a dismissed employee believes the termination was unjust or procedurally flawed, they may file a complaint with:

  1. Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE)

    • For initial conciliation or mediation proceedings under the Single Entry Approach (SEnA).

  2. National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC)

    • The employee can lodge a formal complaint for illegal dismissal. The NLRC will assess whether there was a valid cause and compliance with due process. Potential remedies include reinstatement (or separation pay if reinstatement is not feasible) and payment of full backwages.

  3. Courts

    • Parties may appeal NLRC decisions to the Court of Appeals and eventually to the Supreme Court.

10. Practical Tips for Employers

  1. Establish Clear Performance Standards

    • Articulate performance targets from the outset, and ensure employees sign or acknowledge these standards.

  2. Use Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs)

    • Before resorting to termination, give structured opportunities for employees to enhance their performance.

  3. Document Everything

    • Keep meticulous records of coaching, warnings, metrics, and employee feedback.

  4. Observe Due Process

    • Issue the two written notices, conduct a hearing or allow a written explanation, then decide properly.

  5. Consult Legal Counsel

    • For complex situations or mass performance-based terminations, legal advice ensures compliance and helps avoid potential lawsuits.

11. Conclusion

Terminating an employee for poor performance in Philippine call centers requires navigating strict legal requirements designed to protect employees’ right to security of tenure. The employer must establish substantive and procedural due process, documenting repeated failure to meet reasonable standards and issuing the requisite notices to explain and notices of decision. By understanding the relevant Labor Code provisions, DOLE regulations, and jurisprudential standards—and by ensuring transparent and well-documented performance management processes—call center employers can lawfully address legitimate performance concerns while safeguarding themselves against potential legal challenges.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific concerns, consult a qualified Philippine labor law practitioner.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login