Union Security Agreements: Dismissal Procedures and Limitations

Union Security Agreements: Dismissal Procedures and Limitations under Philippine Law

Union security agreements, in Philippine labor law, refer to clauses in a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) that require employees to maintain union membership as a condition for continued employment. These provisions are meant to strengthen and preserve the union as the exclusive bargaining agent. Despite their legality, union security agreements must comply with mandatory statutory and jurisprudential requirements—most notably, they must respect workers’ rights to due process and must be enforced in accordance with limitations set by law and public policy.

Below is an extensive discussion of union security agreements under Philippine law, with particular emphasis on dismissal procedures and limitations.

1. Legal Basis

  1. The Labor Code of the Philippines

    • Union security clauses are recognized under Book V of the Labor Code, particularly in provisions that grant legitimate labor organizations the right to negotiate CBAs.
    • Although the Labor Code does not explicitly list all forms of union security agreements, Article 259 (previously Article 248) and related provisions affirm the legality of union security arrangements such as closed shop, union shop, and maintenance-of-membership clauses—subject to the requirement that these clauses do not violate employees’ constitutional or statutory rights.

  2. Constitutional Underpinnings

    • The 1987 Constitution guarantees the rights of workers to self-organization and to collective bargaining. These constitutional guarantees must be read in harmony with the principle that employees cannot be unfairly deprived of employment.
    • The exercise of union security must also comport with the constitutional right to due process (Article III, Section 1, Bill of Rights).

  3. Relevant Jurisprudence

    • The Supreme Court has consistently upheld the validity of union security provisions, provided they adhere to fairness, reasonableness, and comply with the statutory requirement of due process.
    • Important cases include:
      • General Milling Corporation v. Casio, G.R. No. 149552 (2003): Clarifies the need for procedural due process in dismissals arising from union security clauses.
      • St. Luke’s Medical Center, Inc. v. Torres, G.R. No. 179605 (2010): Highlights the employer’s duty to independently ascertain the validity of the union’s request for dismissal.

2. Types of Union Security Agreements

Union security agreements typically appear as clauses within a CBA. While terminology can vary, common types include:

  1. Closed Shop

    • A strict form of union security whereby the employer agrees to hire only union members and to dismiss any employee who loses union membership.
    • In the Philippine setting, closed shop clauses are permitted but must strictly observe due process for dismissal.

  2. Union Shop

    • Requires all newly hired employees (who are covered by the bargaining unit) to join the union within a specified period as a condition for continued employment.
    • Typically provides a grace period for non-union members to decide whether or not to join, after which membership becomes mandatory.

  3. Maintenance-of-Membership Clause

    • Requires employees who are members of the union at the time of the CBA’s execution—or who voluntarily join thereafter—to maintain their membership for the duration of the agreement.
    • Usually does not require non-members to join, but it compels existing members to remain in good standing.

  4. Modified Union Shop

    • A variation that applies the membership requirement to future hires only, or under modified conditions spelled out in the CBA.

3. Dismissal Procedures under Union Security Clauses

When an employee allegedly violates a union security clause (e.g., failing to pay dues, resigning from the union, or engaging in conduct that warrants expulsion from the union), Philippine labor law requires a procedure that respects the employee’s right to due process. The following steps are typically observed:

  1. Union’s Internal Investigation and Notice

    • The union must initiate and conduct its own investigation consistent with its constitution and bylaws.
    • The employee must be notified in writing of the charges and be given the opportunity to explain or defend against those charges.

  2. Union Decision or Resolution

    • If the union decides to expel or discipline the employee based on a legitimate breach of union security, it must issue a formal decision in accordance with its rules.
    • The decision should articulate the factual basis and the specific provision of the union constitution or the CBA that has been violated.

  3. Request to Employer

    • After expelling the employee (or otherwise imposing discipline that justifies termination under the CBA), the union typically requests the employer to dismiss the employee for violation of the union security clause.

  4. Employer’s Independent Review

    • The employer is generally bound by the union security clause but cannot blindly follow the union’s request.
    • Jurisprudence (e.g., St. Luke’s Medical Center v. Torres) holds that the employer must undertake an independent assessment of whether (1) the union’s expulsion process met the standards of due process, and (2) the dismissal request is consistent with law, public policy, and the CBA.
    • An employer that dismisses an employee without verifying these elements risks liability for illegal dismissal.

  5. Compliance with Statutory Due Process

    • Separate from the union’s internal proceedings, the Labor Code requires that all dismissals conform to the “two-notice rule”:
      1. First Notice (Notice to Explain): Informing the employee of the specific acts or omissions for which dismissal is sought.
      2. Second Notice (Notice of Decision): Issued after the employee is given a reasonable opportunity to respond, notifying the employee of the employer’s decision to dismiss (if that is the outcome).
    • Even though the impetus for dismissal comes from the union, the employer is not exempted from issuing these notices.

4. Limitations and Protections for Employees

While union security clauses are legal and enforceable, there are key limitations and protections for employees:

  1. Reasonableness and Good Faith

    • Courts scrutinize union security clauses to ensure they are exercised fairly and in good faith.
    • A union cannot weaponize security provisions to harass or retaliate against dissenting members.

  2. Prohibition against Illegal Dismissals

    • Dismissals under union security agreements must be for a valid cause. A union’s mere wish to terminate an employee—without lawful cause—does not justify dismissal.
    • The employer can be held liable for illegal dismissal if it terminates an employee on the union’s say-so without conducting its own due diligence.

  3. Due Process Requirement

    • Philippine law is stringent in protecting employees’ due process rights. Even in union security dismissals, the minimal requirements of notice and hearing (or at least the opportunity to be heard) must be provided.
    • Violation of these procedural requirements can invalidate the dismissal and subject the employer (and, in some cases, union officers) to liability for backwages and reinstatement.

  4. Proportionality of Penalty

    • The penalty of dismissal must be commensurate with the alleged infraction. For example, minor or inadvertent lapses in paying union dues may not justify termination if they can be corrected.
    • If the offense is trivial or the penalty disproportionate, a dismissal may be overturned on the ground of being unduly harsh or oppressive.

  5. Public Policy Considerations

    • The State’s policy of encouraging unionization and collective bargaining must be balanced with the individual’s right to job security.
    • Courts will strike down any union security clause that contravenes public policy or fundamental rights.

  6. Remedies for Aggrieved Employees

    • An employee who believes they have been wrongfully dismissed under a union security clause can file a complaint for illegal dismissal before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).
    • If the NLRC or the courts find the termination unjust, remedies typically include reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and payment of full backwages (or separation pay in lieu of reinstatement, when applicable).

5. Practical Considerations for Employers and Unions

  1. Clearly Drafted CBA Provisions

    • To avoid misunderstandings, parties should craft precise and unambiguous language regarding union security clauses, specifying:
      • Grounds for expulsion or discipline.
      • Procedures for notifying and investigating alleged violations.
      • The process for requesting dismissal from the employer.
      • Time frames for each step of the procedure.

  2. Union’s Internal Rules

    • Unions should ensure that their constitutions, bylaws, and internal procedures on discipline reflect principles of due process and transparency.
    • Proper record-keeping of investigations, hearings, and decisions is vital, particularly if the dismissal is later challenged in labor tribunals or courts.

  3. Employer’s Exercise of Independent Judgment

    • Even with a union request for dismissal, an employer must (a) verify if the union has complied with its due process obligations, (b) ascertain whether the violation is legitimate, and (c) issue the required notices to the employee.
    • Employers that ignore these steps expose themselves to potential illegal dismissal findings.

  4. Continuous Dialogue

    • A cooperative approach between union leaders and management can minimize disputes. Pre-termination consultations, clarifications on union dues, and consistent communication regarding union membership obligations can help prevent abrupt or contested dismissals.

6. Selected Supreme Court Doctrines

  1. Union Security Clauses are Permissible but Not Absolute

    • The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that union security clauses do not give the union unbridled discretion. They must operate within the bounds of law and fair practice.

  2. Employer’s Liability in Illegal Dismissal

    • If the employer dismisses an employee purely on the union’s request without checking the legitimacy and procedural regularity of the expulsion, the employer risks being held liable for illegal dismissal.

  3. Burden of Proof

    • The burden to prove just or authorized cause for termination lies with the employer. In union security cases, employers must present proof that (a) the union recommended dismissal for a valid reason, and (b) the employee was accorded due process.

  4. Impact of Reinstatement

    • When a dismissal is held invalid, reinstatement is generally mandated, with full backwages accruing until final resolution or actual reinstatement—unless the court rules otherwise.

7. Conclusion

Union security agreements are recognized as a vital mechanism to protect the solidarity and bargaining strength of labor unions in the Philippines. These clauses, however, are tempered by the country’s strong emphasis on due process and the protection of employees’ rights. While employers have a contractual obligation to observe union security provisions enshrined in a CBA, the law imposes a corresponding duty to ensure that dismissals arising therefrom are legally and procedurally proper.

Overall, for a dismissal under a union security clause to be valid:

  1. The union must have a legitimate basis (as spelled out in the CBA, union constitution, or bylaws) for expelling or disciplining a member.
  2. The union must observe its own internal due process requirements before expelling or recommending dismissal.
  3. The employer must verify the union’s findings, exercise independent judgment, and comply with statutory dismissal procedures (two-notice rule).
  4. The dismissal must not contravene fundamental rights or public policy.

By respecting these principles, both unions and employers can maintain labor peace while preserving the dignity and security of employees in the workplace.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information on union security agreements under Philippine law and is not intended as legal advice. For specific concerns, it is best to seek personalized counsel from a qualified Philippine labor law practitioner or consult the relevant government labor agencies.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login