Unlawful Termination and Illegal Dismissal in the Philippines

Disclaimer: The following article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice pertaining to your specific circumstances, please consult a licensed attorney in the Philippines.

Unlawful Termination and Illegal Dismissal in the Philippines

Employment security is a core principle of Philippine labor law. Under the 1987 Philippine Constitution, the State affirms labor as a primary social economic force and guarantees the workers’ right to security of tenure. This constitutional guarantee is codified and detailed in the Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended).

The terms “unlawful termination” and “illegal dismissal” are often used interchangeably. They refer to any termination of employment that is not compliant with the substantive and procedural requirements provided by law. Below is a comprehensive discussion of key aspects, including causes of termination, procedural requirements, remedies, and relevant jurisprudence.

1. Legal Framework

  1. 1987 Philippine Constitution

    • Article XIII, Section 3 affirms the right of workers to security of tenure, humane conditions of work, and participation in policy-making processes affecting them.

  2. Labor Code of the Philippines (PD 442, as amended)

    • Book VI, Title I (Termination of Employment) lays down the substantive and procedural requirements for valid dismissals.

  3. Jurisprudence

    • Decisions by the Philippine Supreme Court play a pivotal role in clarifying and expanding the principles regarding terminations, as case rulings set precedents on how provisions of the Labor Code and related laws are to be interpreted.

2. Concept of Security of Tenure

Security of tenure means that an employee cannot be dismissed except for just or authorized causes provided by law, and only after due process has been properly observed. Any dismissal that fails to comply with these requirements is illegal or unlawful.

3. Grounds for Termination

A. Just Causes (Labor Code, Article 297)

Just causes are reasons attributable to the fault or negligence of the employee. They require proof that the employee’s actions or conduct merit termination. Examples include:

  1. Serious misconduct or willful disobedience
    • Misconduct must be grave and connected to the employee’s performance of duties.
    • Willful disobedience refers to willful refusal to obey lawful orders pertaining to work.
  2. Gross and habitual neglect of duties
    • Must involve repeated failure to perform job responsibilities, leading to significant harm or risk to the employer’s interests.
  3. Fraud or willful breach of trust
    • Often applied in positions of trust (e.g., cashiers, managers) where honesty and integrity are essential.
  4. Commission of a crime or offense against the employer or his/her family or representative
    • Must be work-related or committed during the course of employment.
  5. Other analogous causes
    • Instances akin to those enumerated above, as determined by jurisprudence.

B. Authorized Causes (Labor Code, Articles 298-299)

Authorized causes do not necessarily arise from the employee’s fault or negligence. Rather, they originate from business or economic considerations or illnesses affecting the employee. The main authorized causes include:

  1. Installation of labor-saving devices
    • Adoption of technology or new systems leading to redundancy of certain positions.
  2. Redundancy
    • The position is in excess of what is reasonably demanded by the actual requirements of the enterprise.
  3. Retrenchment to prevent losses
    • A reduction in the workforce to cut costs due to serious financial reverses or imminent losses.
  4. Closure or cessation of business
    • The employer decides to close operations (in part or entirely), whether the business is losing or not.
  5. Disease or illness
    • The employee has a disease that renders continued employment harmful to his or her health or to the health of co-employees.

Notice and Separation Pay Requirements for Authorized Causes

  • The employer must issue a written notice of termination to both the employee and the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) at least 30 days before the intended date of termination.
  • Separation pay varies depending on the authorized cause (e.g., for redundancy, at least one month’s pay per year of service).

4. Due Process Requirements

A. Substantive Due Process

  • Relates to the sufficiency of the grounds for termination (i.e., just cause or authorized cause).
  • Without a legally valid reason for dismissal, the termination is deemed illegal.

B. Procedural Due Process

  1. For Just Causes (Two-Notice Rule)

    1. First Written Notice (Notice to Explain)
      • Informing the employee of the specific acts or omissions for which dismissal is sought.
      • The employee must be given a reasonable opportunity (usually 5 calendar days) to answer the allegations in writing and to present evidence.
    2. Hearing or Conference
      • Employers are encouraged to conduct a hearing to allow employees to explain their side further if warranted.
    3. Second Written Notice (Notice of Decision)
      • After evaluating the employee’s explanation and evidence, the employer must inform the employee in writing of the final decision, explaining the factual and legal basis for termination.

  2. For Authorized Causes

    • Notice to Employee and Notice to DOLE at least 30 days prior to the date of termination.
    • Payment of separation pay as mandated by law.

Failure to observe procedural due process can result in legal consequences. Even if the dismissal is substantively justified but procedurally flawed, the employer can be held liable for nominal damages.

5. Consequences of Illegal Dismissal

When the employer fails either to prove the existence of a just/authorized cause or to observe due process, the termination is deemed illegal. The usual remedies for illegal dismissal are:

  1. Reinstatement
    • The illegally dismissed employee is entitled to be returned to his or her former position without loss of seniority rights and other privileges.
  2. Payment of Full Back Wages
    • Covers the period from the time the employee’s compensation was withheld (the date of dismissal) until actual reinstatement.
  3. Separation Pay in Lieu of Reinstatement
    • If reinstatement is no longer feasible (e.g., the position has been abolished, or strained relations exist), the employee may be awarded separation pay instead.
    • Usually computed at one month’s salary for every year of service (or a fraction of at least six months treated as one year).
  4. Other Monetary Benefits
    • 13th month pay differentials, allowances, and other benefits that the employee might have earned if not for the dismissal.
  5. Damages (if warranted)
    • Nominal Damages: Awarded if procedural due process was not observed, even if the dismissal was for a valid cause.
    • Moral and Exemplary Damages: These may be awarded if the dismissal was attended by bad faith, malice, or fraud.

6. Burden of Proof

  • Employer’s Burden: In illegal dismissal cases, the employer carries the burden of proving that the dismissal was for a lawful cause.
  • Employee’s Burden: The employee must first establish the fact of dismissal. Once alleged and substantiated, the employer must justify the dismissal.

7. Mechanisms for Redress

  1. Filing a Complaint before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC)

    • The employee must file a complaint within four years from the date of dismissal for money claims and other damages arising from the illegal dismissal.
    • The Labor Arbiter has original jurisdiction, with the NLRC serving as the appellate body for labor disputes.

  2. Mandatory Conciliation and Mediation (Single Entry Approach or SEnA)

    • Prior to filing a formal complaint, parties are encouraged or required to undergo mandatory conciliation through SEnA in the Department of Labor and Employment to attempt an amicable settlement.

  3. Appeals

    • Decisions of the Labor Arbiter can be appealed to the NLRC, and from the NLRC to the Court of Appeals, and ultimately the Supreme Court on questions of law.

8. Special Considerations in Illegal Dismissal Cases

  1. Probationary Employees

    • Still enjoy security of tenure during the probationary period. They may only be terminated for just causes or if they fail to meet reasonable standards made known at the time of engagement.
    • Must be given due process in accordance with the Labor Code and pertinent regulations.

  2. Project and Seasonal Employees

    • Employment is tied to a specific project or season. Once the project or season is completed, the employment naturally ends, so termination claims usually hinge on whether the project or seasonal period indeed concluded or whether termination was premature.

  3. Fixed-Term Employees

    • Employment ends upon expiration of the agreed period, provided the fixed-term arrangement is not used to circumvent security of tenure.

  4. Constructive Dismissal

    • Occurs when an employee is forced to quit or resign because of an employer’s unlawful acts, such as demotion, reduction in pay, or hostile working environment. The law treats this as an involuntary termination and gives the employee the same remedies as in outright dismissal.

  5. Retaliatory Dismissal

    • Often occurs if the employer terminates an employee in retaliation for exercising rights (e.g., filing a complaint about labor standards, unionizing). The courts consider this a form of illegal dismissal due to violation of the constitutional right to self-organization and other workers’ rights.

  6. Discrimination in Employment

    • Dismissals based on race, gender, religion, or any other protected classification are prohibited. If proven, the dismissal is illegal, and additional remedies under special laws may apply (e.g., Anti-Sexual Harassment Act, Magna Carta of Women).

9. Key Supreme Court Doctrines

  1. Twin-Notice Rule

    • Emphasized that dismissals must strictly comply with the twin-notice requirement. Non-observance renders the dismissal procedurally infirm.

  2. Substantial Evidence Standard

    • In labor cases, the employer needs to provide “substantial evidence” – such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion – to justify a dismissal.

  3. Doctrine of Strained Relations

    • Though reinstatement is the general rule, if the relationship between employer and employee has become so strained that reinstatement is no longer advisable, courts may grant separation pay in lieu of reinstatement.

  4. Burden of Proof is on the Employer

    • Confirmed in a string of cases that in illegal dismissal lawsuits, the employer must prove the legality of dismissal.

10. Practical Tips for Employers and Employees

  1. For Employers

    • Maintain clear and documented company policies and guidelines, including disciplinary rules.
    • Follow the two-notice rule strictly for just causes.
    • Observe the 30-day notice requirement to both employee and DOLE for authorized causes.
    • Keep documentation (incident reports, memorandum, personnel files) organized to establish grounds for termination.

  2. For Employees

    • Understand your employment contract and the company’s policies.
    • If you receive a show-cause memorandum, respond promptly and truthfully, and keep copies of all correspondence.
    • If faced with a seemingly unjust or unauthorized dismissal, gather evidence (e.g., pay slips, termination letters, internal communications) and seek professional legal assistance.

11. Conclusion

Illegal dismissal is a serious matter in Philippine labor law, reflecting the State’s policy to protect workers’ rights while balancing the valid interests of business. For a termination to be valid, it must rest on a lawful ground (just or authorized) and follow due process (substantive and procedural). Failure in either aspect renders a dismissal illegal, entitling the worker to reinstatement, back wages, and other appropriate remedies.

While this article provides an overview of the laws, procedures, and remedies related to unlawful termination in the Philippines, it is always best to consult a qualified labor law practitioner for personalized advice. Ensuring compliance with legal requirements not only upholds employees’ rights but also fosters fair and productive work environments beneficial to both employers and employees alike.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not replace professional legal advice. For personalized guidance on specific situations, consult an attorney or a labor law expert in the Philippines.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login