A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE ON ADDRESSING AWOL EMPLOYEES IN THE PHILIPPINES

LETTER TO A LAWYER

Dear Attorney,

Greetings! I am currently serving as a manager at a certain organization, and I am reaching out to seek your professional guidance regarding an employee who has gone on absence without official leave (AWOL). I would like to understand the most appropriate steps to take in ensuring the company’s legal compliance, while also protecting both the employer’s and the employee’s rights under Philippine law. Specifically, I am concerned about the proper procedure for documenting the employee’s AWOL status, the notices and due process requirements involved, the timing for possible termination if necessary, and any other legal repercussions that might arise from this situation.

I look forward to your expert advice and detailed explanations on how best to handle this concern in alignment with the relevant labor regulations. Any guidance you can provide on drafting notices, conducting hearings, or dealing with separation pay and final pay (if applicable) would be immensely helpful.

Thank you very much for your assistance.

Respectfully,

A Concerned Manager

LEGAL ARTICLE: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT EMPLOYEES WHO GO AWOL IN THE PHILIPPINES

When an employee is absent without official leave (AWOL), it creates challenges not only for daily business operations but also for compliance with the Labor Code of the Philippines and related regulations. Employers must proceed carefully to adhere to statutory due process standards and avoid potential liabilities, such as illegal dismissal claims. This comprehensive guide aims to provide a meticulous discussion of Philippine laws, regulations, and practices relevant to AWOL employees, along with best practices for managing these situations legally and fairly.

1. Definition of Absence Without Official Leave (AWOL)

Under common Philippine employment practice, AWOL typically refers to a situation in which an employee fails to report for work without obtaining the necessary authorization or leave approval from the employer. While the Labor Code of the Philippines does not explicitly define “AWOL,” it is generally understood as a serious misconduct or an act of neglecting one’s duties and responsibilities, especially when the absence is prolonged or repeated.

Key elements that help identify AWOL include:

  1. The employee’s unexplained or unapproved absence from work.
  2. The absence extending for a certain period without notice or any attempt to inform the employer.
  3. The lack of any valid justification for the absence, such as medical reasons or urgent personal matters, paired with the employee’s failure to present acceptable proof or request for leave.

2. Legal Foundations and Relevant Laws

  1. Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442)

    • The Labor Code outlines the rights and obligations of both employers and employees. While there is no specific provision in the Labor Code that uses the term “AWOL,” various articles discuss valid or authorized causes for termination, employee discipline, and due process.
    • Article 297 (formerly Article 282) provides the just causes for termination, including:
      • Serious Misconduct
      • Willful Disobedience
      • Gross and Habitual Neglect of Duties
      • Fraud or Willful Breach of Trust
      • Commission of a Crime or Offense Against the Employer or His/Her Representative
    • Prolonged or repeated absences without leave can fall under serious misconduct or gross and habitual neglect of duties, depending on the circumstances.

  2. Omnibus Rules Implementing the Labor Code

    • The Omnibus Rules contain detailed procedural guidelines for disciplinary actions, including the requirement for procedural due process in termination cases. Employers must provide employees with notice to explain, conduct an investigation or hearing if required, and issue a final notice of decision.

  3. Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) Regulations

    • The DOLE issues various circulars, opinions, and labor advisories. While these do not typically lay out specific “AWOL” scenarios, they reinforce the principle that an employer cannot terminate an employee without following proper procedure and without just or authorized causes.

3. Just Cause and The Concept of AWOL

AWOL can be subsumed under “just causes” for termination if it meets the standard of serious misconduct or habitual neglect of duties. However, not every single day of absence automatically justifies dismissal. Whether AWOL will serve as a valid ground for termination depends on the totality of circumstances:

  1. Frequency and Duration

    • A single instance of not reporting to work might not be sufficient to establish just cause. The seriousness of the offense typically increases if the absence is prolonged or repeated without any communication.

  2. Intent and Willfulness

    • An employee who voluntarily refuses to inform the employer or deliberately chooses not to return to work, without any valid reason or notice, demonstrates a greater degree of misconduct.

  3. Business Impact

    • The disruption caused by the employee’s absence to company operations, productivity, or client expectations can also play a role in determining the severity of the offense.

Employers are still required to go through due process to formally declare that the employee’s AWOL amounts to a valid ground for disciplinary action or termination.

4. Importance of Following Due Process

In the Philippines, an employer cannot terminate an employee solely on the employer’s unilateral conclusion that the employee violated company rules. The Supreme Court has consistently reiterated the requirement of substantive and procedural due process:

  1. Substantive Due Process

    • Means that there must be a valid or just cause for dismissal. Simply stating that the employee was AWOL is insufficient. The employer must demonstrate that the absences are serious, deliberate, and detrimental enough to qualify as a lawful cause for dismissal.

  2. Procedural Due Process

    • Often called the “two-notice rule.” The employer must:
      1. Issue a Notice to Explain (NTE) to the employee, clearly stating the alleged violation (i.e., absence without official leave). This notice should contain enough detail for the employee to understand the charges and present a defense.
      2. Provide an Opportunity to be Heard either through a hearing or the employee’s written explanation. The employer should assess any justification or evidence the employee submits.
      3. Issue a Notice of Decision (NOD) conveying the employer’s final ruling on whether the employee is terminated or subjected to lesser disciplinary action.

Failure to observe procedural due process could lead to claims of illegal dismissal, even if the cause is justified. In the event that the employer fails to comply with procedural requirements, the employer might be ordered to pay indemnity, nominal damages, or back wages, depending on the case.

5. Steps for Documenting AWOL and Initiating Disciplinary Action

Below is a recommended procedure for addressing AWOL concerns:

  1. Verify the Employee’s Status

    • Confirm that the employee did not file any leave application, provide medical certificates, or communicate a valid excuse. Ensure that managers, HR personnel, and immediate supervisors have made reasonable attempts to contact the employee (e.g., calls, text messages, e-mails).

  2. Send a Notice to Explain (NTE)

    • Upon determining that the absence was unauthorized, the employer should send a written notice (or NTE) to the employee’s last known address or via official e-mail. State the specific dates of absence, the company’s rules on attendance, and the gravity of potential sanctions.
    • If the employee fails to respond within the allotted time (commonly 48 to 72 hours), the employer can proceed with the next steps while keeping a record of the employee’s non-response.

  3. Allow the Employee to Present a Defense

    • Even if the employee remains absent, it is crucial to demonstrate that the employer made all reasonable efforts to hear the employee’s side. If the employee replies and provides a justification (e.g., medical emergency or personal problems), assess its validity and request supporting documents if necessary.

  4. Conduct an Administrative Hearing if Needed

    • For serious offenses or if the employee returns and contests the allegations, an administrative hearing can help clarify the facts. Document minutes of the hearing and preserve any evidence or testimony.

  5. Notice of Decision (NOD)

    • If the employer finds that the employee is indeed AWOL without valid reasons, it can issue a Notice of Decision. This document must detail the findings, whether the employee is terminated or given a different sanction, and the effective date.

  6. Record-Keeping and Final Pay

    • Keep copies of all notices, communications, and evidence of the employee’s absence. If termination is warranted, coordinate with HR to calculate any final pay due, ensuring compliance with Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) rules on release of final pay.

6. Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

  1. Failing to Document Communications

    • Employers should maintain a paper trail of attempts to contact the employee or notices sent. The absence of documentation can weaken the employer’s legal position.

  2. Neglecting Procedural Requirements

    • Even if the employee is unequivocally AWOL, skipping the notice and hearing procedure may lead to illegal dismissal claims.

  3. Delaying the Issuance of Notices

    • The longer the employer waits to issue a Notice to Explain, the harder it becomes to implement corrective action or to prove that the AWOL was taken seriously.

  4. Inconsistent Enforcement of Company Policy

    • Employers should be consistent in applying policies. If AWOL is tolerated in some cases but strictly penalized in others without justification, employees might claim discrimination or unfair labor practice.

  5. Prematurely Declaring Abandonment of Work

    • The Supreme Court repeatedly states that abandonment is a deliberate and unjustified refusal to resume employment. The mere absence is not proof of abandonment, especially if the employer cannot demonstrate the employee’s clear intention to sever the employer-employee relationship. Proper documentation and notices are still critical.

7. Abandonment of Work vs. AWOL

While AWOL can sometimes be associated with abandonment of work, these two concepts are not strictly identical. Abandonment involves an intention to no longer return to one’s job. Courts often require two elements to establish abandonment:

  1. Failure to report for work or absence without valid reason.
  2. Clear intention to sever the employer-employee relationship.

In practice, many employees who go on AWOL for extended periods might still claim they intended to return. For a successful claim of abandonment, the employer must present evidence that the employee had no intention to come back, such as ignoring repeated notices or actively seeking employment elsewhere.

8. Possible Sanctions for AWOL

Under company policies, disciplinary action for AWOL can range from written warnings to dismissal, depending on the gravity, duration, and frequency. Common sanctions include:

  1. Verbal Reprimand or Counseling

    • For first-time or relatively minor offenses, an employer may choose to counsel the employee, especially if the absence was brief.

  2. Written Warning

    • A formal written warning is often appropriate for repeated unauthorized absences or if the initial offense is sufficiently serious.

  3. Suspension

    • A temporary suspension without pay may be imposed for repeated offenses or more serious instances of unauthorized absence.

  4. Termination for Just Cause

    • As a last resort, termination may be imposed if the AWOL is both serious and the employer has complied with due process requirements. This is particularly relevant where the employee has a pattern of multiple AWOL incidents or has been absent for a prolonged period without justification.

9. Employer’s Remedies in Case of AWOL

Beyond disciplinary action, employers might wonder whether they can pursue monetary damages or other remedies against an AWOL employee. Typically, the employer’s primary recourse is internal disciplinary procedures leading to termination if warranted. Seeking damages is rare, as employees generally have limited resources, and the Labor Code does not usually provide for recovery of damages from employees unless there is a contractual stipulation or a separate civil wrongdoing.

10. Legal Risks and Possible Claims by the Employee

Even if the employee is truly AWOL, the employer must guard against potential litigation. The employee could file a complaint for illegal dismissal, asserting:

  1. Lack of Just Cause

    • The employee may argue that the absence was justified due to illness, emergency, or harassment in the workplace. They might claim the employer never gave them a real chance to explain.

  2. Lack of Procedural Due Process

    • The employee may allege they never received a notice or had the chance to attend a hearing.

  3. Constructive Dismissal

    • In some cases, an employee who feels forced out or subjected to an intolerable work environment might claim constructive dismissal rather than truly abandoning their post.

  4. Non-Payment of Final Pay and Benefits

    • Regardless of the cause of termination, employees are still entitled to any earned wages, accrued leave (if company policy allows), and other benefits as mandated by law.

To mitigate these risks, it is paramount for the employer to demonstrate that it strictly followed legal processes and gave the employee every reasonable opportunity to explain or clarify their absence.

11. Best Practices for Employers

  1. Establish Clear Attendance Policies

    • Have a well-defined attendance policy that outlines what constitutes AWOL, the process for reporting absences, and the corresponding penalties. Ensure that employees are given a copy of this policy upon hiring.

  2. Implement a Reliable Notification System

    • Encourage employees to inform the company of absences through standard channels (e.g., email, text message, or phone call) and clarify the acceptable deadlines for doing so.

  3. Maintain Updated Contact Information

    • Keep updated employee records to guarantee that notices (NTEs, NODs) are sent to the correct address or email, minimizing disputes over non-receipt of communication.

  4. Document Everything

    • Keep thorough records of attendance infractions, communications with the employee, and internal investigations. Documentation can be decisive in any labor dispute.

  5. Train Supervisors and HR

    • Ensure that those responsible for handling AWOL cases understand legal requirements and the importance of consistent application of policies.

  6. Seek Legal Counsel When Needed

    • In complex situations or if the AWOL raises potential legal claims (e.g., discrimination, harassment, constructive dismissal), consulting legal experts can help avoid pitfalls.

12. Returning Employee Scenarios

Sometimes, an AWOL employee will reappear after some time. Employers can opt to:

  1. Require Justification

    • Ask the employee to provide proof of why they were absent. If the explanation is valid (e.g., medical emergencies, force majeure), the employer might retroactively consider the absence as a leave if evidence is sufficient.

  2. Impose Sanctions

    • If the explanation is not acceptable or the employee provides no valid documentation, the employer can impose penalties consistent with company policy, up to and including termination.

  3. Give a Chance for Rehabilitation

    • In some cases, the employer may provide additional counseling or place the employee under a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) or an attendance improvement program before resorting to termination.

13. Impact of AWOL on Employee Benefits and Final Pay

Once an employee is separated from the company (whether through termination or resignation), the employer is obligated to settle unpaid wages, 13th month pay (if applicable), and any other accrued benefits in a timely manner. Even if the dismissal is due to AWOL, the employer cannot forfeit benefits that the employee has already earned.

An important note is that while employees are often not entitled to separation pay in cases of just cause termination (e.g., serious misconduct), an employer must carefully review its own policies or collective bargaining agreements (if applicable), as these may grant separation pay or financial assistance on humanitarian grounds.

14. Practical Considerations and Exceptions

  1. Immediate Resignation

    • In some instances, employees will claim that their AWOL is effectively an immediate resignation. Under the Labor Code, employees are supposed to give a 30-day notice unless certain exceptions apply. Going AWOL does not exempt an employee from fulfilling this notice requirement, but the employer typically has little recourse to force the employee back to work.

  2. Contractual Obligations

    • If there is a specific contract stipulating damages or penalties for leaving employment without notice (common in some specialized industries), the employer could explore a civil claim. However, such claims can be lengthy and costly, and they must not violate labor laws.

  3. Special Circumstances (e.g., Overseas Filipino Workers, Seafarers)

    • Different rules may apply to overseas employees or seafarers who go AWOL while under contract, as their employment is also governed by POEA rules or the Maritime Labor Convention. Employers in these situations should review specialized regulations.

  4. Pandemic or National Emergencies

    • During times of pandemic or emergency, employees who fail to report due to transportation challenges, quarantines, or health concerns may not necessarily be considered AWOL. DOLE advisories often encourage employers to provide flexible leave arrangements.

15. Case Law Highlights

Philippine jurisprudence provides ample guidance on AWOL-related cases. Several Supreme Court decisions stress that the critical factor is the presence or absence of the intention to return to work, as well as proof that the employer adhered to due process. Notable points from various decisions include:

  1. Good Faith Misunderstandings

    • If an employee believed in good faith that they had permission to take a leave, termination might be overturned if the employer did not clarify or communicate attendance expectations clearly.

  2. Multiple Infractions

    • Repeated instances of AWOL, especially after repeated warnings, strengthen the employer’s case for termination, provided procedural due process is given each time.

  3. Length of Absence

    • An extended absence (e.g., 6 months or more) without any communication can be a strong indication of abandonment, but the employer must still provide notices.

16. Conclusion

Addressing an employee’s unauthorized absence or AWOL status in the Philippines requires a clear understanding of both substantive and procedural requirements under the Labor Code and related jurisprudence. By following the proper steps—issuing a Notice to Explain, allowing the employee to present a defense, conducting an administrative hearing if warranted, and issuing a final decision—an employer can protect itself from possible illegal dismissal claims and maintain fair disciplinary standards in the workplace.

Key Takeaways:

  1. Due Process is Paramount – Even if the employee appears evidently at fault for going AWOL, strict compliance with the two-notice rule is crucial.
  2. Document Everything – Thoroughly record all attempts to contact the employee, the notices issued, and the employee’s responses or lack thereof.
  3. Proportional Disciplinary Measures – Sanctions should be proportionate to the offense and consistent with established company policies.
  4. Seek Legal Counsel If Unsure – For complex or high-risk situations, professional advice can preempt costly litigation.

By proactively implementing clear attendance and leave policies, training personnel on due process requirements, and handling AWOL cases with consistency and fairness, employers can foster an environment of accountability while minimizing legal exposure. Should an employee go AWOL, following the procedural mandates and documenting every step can ensure that any subsequent termination or disciplinary action will be defensible under Philippine labor law.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login