Can I Receive Back Pay If I Was AWOL?

Letter to the Attorney

Dear Attorney,

I hope this message finds you well. I am seeking legal advice on a matter related to my employment situation. I went on AWOL (Absent Without Official Leave) during my tenure with my previous employer. Recently, I have been wondering if I am still entitled to receive any back pay despite my AWOL status.

Could you please shed light on whether an employee who went AWOL can claim back pay under Philippine labor laws? If such a claim is possible, what are the conditions or legal processes required to pursue it? Conversely, if back pay is not an option, are there any legal remedies available to individuals in similar situations?

I would greatly appreciate your guidance on this matter. Thank you in advance for your time and assistance.

Respectfully yours,
A Concerned Employee


Legal Article: Entitlement to Back Pay After AWOL Under Philippine Law

Under Philippine labor law, the issue of whether an employee who has gone AWOL (Absent Without Official Leave) can claim back pay is multifaceted, involving principles of labor rights, employment contracts, and employer prerogatives. This article explores the circumstances under which back pay may be claimed by an employee who went AWOL and discusses the potential legal ramifications.

I. Understanding AWOL and Its Implications

AWOL occurs when an employee is absent from work without notifying the employer or securing prior approval for their absence. AWOL is generally considered a violation of the terms of an employment contract and may be treated as a just cause for termination under Article 297 of the Labor Code of the Philippines.

From a legal standpoint, AWOL often results in disciplinary actions, up to and including termination, depending on the employer’s policies and the gravity of the circumstances. It raises significant questions regarding an employee's rights, particularly concerning back pay or final pay, which is legally defined as the sum of unpaid salaries, benefits, and entitlements due to the employee upon separation from employment.


II. What Is Back Pay?

Back pay refers to the wages or benefits that an employee should have received during their employment but which were not paid due to various reasons, such as a wrongful dismissal or delay in payroll processing. The concept is distinct from final pay, which includes all monetary entitlements upon separation, such as unused leave benefits, 13th-month pay, and other accrued payments.


III. Is Back Pay Due to an Employee Who Went AWOL?

1. Legal Framework

The primary basis for evaluating back pay entitlement is the nature of the separation. Philippine labor law generally recognizes two scenarios for separation:

  • Termination for Just Cause: If an employee is terminated due to just cause, such as AWOL, they forfeit certain benefits, including the right to back pay.
  • Resignation or Voluntary Separation: If an employee resigns properly and fulfills notice requirements, they may be entitled to back pay, provided there are no liabilities against them.

In cases of AWOL, termination for just cause is often presumed. The Supreme Court of the Philippines has repeatedly upheld that AWOL constitutes abandonment of duty, which disentitles the employee to back pay. However, the employer must adhere to due process, including notice and a hearing, before terminating an employee for AWOL.

2. Exceptions and Remedies

There are circumstances where an employee who went AWOL may still claim back pay:

  • Improper Dismissal Procedures: If the employer failed to follow the procedural due process for dismissal, the termination may be deemed illegal, entitling the employee to back pay and reinstatement or separation pay in lieu of reinstatement.
  • Constructive Dismissal: If the AWOL was a result of the employer creating a hostile work environment or unilaterally altering employment terms without valid reasons, the employee may invoke constructive dismissal, which would entitle them to back pay.

3. Case Law Precedents

Several rulings highlight the interplay between AWOL and back pay claims:

  • In Reyes v. Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co., the Supreme Court ruled that abandonment (such as AWOL) must be established with clear evidence of intent not to return to work, coupled with unjustified absences. Mere AWOL, without clear abandonment, does not immediately negate back pay claims.
  • In Jardine Davies Inc. v. NLRC, the Court emphasized that an employer’s failure to provide due process renders any dismissal invalid, making back pay mandatory.

IV. Procedural Considerations for Claiming Back Pay

1. Filing a Complaint

An employee disputing non-payment of back pay may file a complaint with the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) or the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC). The claim must be supported by evidence of unpaid wages, employment status, and compliance with employer policies.

2. Employer’s Obligations

Even in AWOL cases, employers are obligated to provide a computation of final pay, including:

  • Accrued wages for days worked before AWOL.
  • Pro-rated 13th-month pay, if applicable.
  • Other monetary benefits accrued prior to the AWOL.

Failure to provide these payments can expose the employer to legal sanctions.

3. Mediation and Settlement

Many labor disputes are resolved through DOLE-mandated conciliation-mediation, allowing both parties to reach an amicable settlement regarding unpaid dues, including back pay.


V. Other Considerations

1. Good Faith and Circumstances Leading to AWOL

The reasons for AWOL may affect the outcome of back pay claims. For instance, if the employee was unable to report to work due to force majeure or medical emergencies, they may still claim entitlements upon proper documentation.

2. Employer’s Policies

Some employers implement policies specifying forfeiture of back pay for employees who go AWOL. While such policies are generally valid, they must align with labor laws and fair practice principles.

3. Statutory Limitations

Claims for back pay must be filed within three years from the date the cause of action accrued, as prescribed by Article 291 of the Labor Code.


VI. Conclusion and Recommendations

In conclusion, an employee who went AWOL is generally not entitled to back pay unless the termination was procedurally flawed or there were mitigating circumstances like constructive dismissal. Employees who believe they were unjustly denied back pay should seek immediate legal counsel to evaluate the specifics of their case.

For Employees:

  • Document all communication with the employer, including notices of absence or reasons for AWOL.
  • File a timely claim if entitlements are withheld.

For Employers:

  • Ensure proper documentation of the AWOL and adherence to due process to avoid disputes.
  • Provide clear policies on back pay entitlement and computation.

This nuanced issue underscores the importance of understanding both employee rights and employer responsibilities under Philippine labor laws. Legal advice tailored to specific circumstances is invaluable in navigating disputes involving AWOL and back pay entitlements.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.