Defamation Philippines

Dear Attorney,

I would like to ask for legal advice. A manager in a group chat referred to me as "abusive and arrogant." Could this be considered defamation, and if so, what legal actions can I take? I feel that the statements may affect my reputation within the company.

Best regards,
[Concerned Employee]


Insights

Defamation in the Philippines: Understanding the Concept

Defamation is a criminal offense under the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines, which includes both libel and slander. This legal concept deals with the protection of an individual’s reputation against false and malicious statements made by others. Defamation may occur through written or spoken words, actions, or other forms of communication, either in public or in private. To understand defamation fully, we need to break it down into its two main forms: libel and slander.

Libel vs. Slander: Forms of Defamation

In the Philippines, defamation can either be:

  • Libel: Defamation through writing, printing, or similar means. It includes statements made via electronic communication, such as social media posts, emails, or group chats.
  • Slander: Defamation through spoken words or actions.

Both libel and slander aim to injure the reputation of a person by attributing a fault, vice, or defect, or by exposing them to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule.

Libel under Article 353 of the Revised Penal Code defines it as a "public and malicious imputation of a crime, or of a vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status, or circumstance tending to cause the dishonor, discredit, or contempt of a natural or juridical person, or to blacken the memory of one who is dead."

On the other hand, slander or oral defamation, is defined under Article 358 of the same Code, where any defamatory imputation through spoken words is penalized. Depending on the gravity of the statement, slander may be classified as simple slander or grave slander, the latter being more serious and carrying heavier penalties.

Elements of Defamation

To establish a case of defamation in the Philippines, the following elements must be present:

  1. Imputation of a discreditable act or condition: There must be a statement that attributes a crime, vice, defect, or any negative condition to the person.

  2. Publication: The defamatory statement must be made public, which means it was communicated to a third party. In cases involving group chats, social media, or emails, statements are considered published when others in the group or platform see or read the defamatory message.

  3. Identification: The person being defamed must be identifiable, either directly or indirectly, by the content of the statement.

  4. Malice: There must be intent to defame. In libel cases, malice is presumed if no good intention or justifiable motive is present. This presumption is what often strengthens libel cases in the Philippines.

Defamation in Electronic Communications

Under the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10175), libel committed through electronic means, such as the internet or group chats, is penalized more severely. This includes defamatory remarks made via text messages, emails, social media, and messaging apps like Viber or Messenger.

The Cyber Libel provision applies when defamatory statements are posted or sent electronically, leading to broader dissemination and greater potential for reputational damage. Therefore, defamatory comments made in group chats, where others may witness the statement, fall under this category.

Defenses Against Defamation

Not all defamatory statements lead to legal liability. The accused may raise several defenses, including:

  • Truth: If the statement made is truthful, it can be used as a valid defense, provided that the subject matter is of public concern and is made with good motives.

  • Privileged Communication: Statements made in certain circumstances may be classified as privileged communications, which are protected by law. These include:

    • Absolute Privilege: These are statements made in the performance of an official duty, such as those made by government officials during legislative sessions or judicial proceedings. In such cases, no defamation liability arises.
    • Qualified Privilege: Statements made in good faith and without malice in certain situations, such as fair and true reports about court proceedings or communications made in the course of official duties, may also be privileged.
  • Lack of Malice: If the defendant can prove that the defamatory statement was made without malicious intent, they may avoid liability.

Penalties for Defamation

The penalties for libel under the Revised Penal Code are imprisonment and fines. In cyber libel cases, under the Cybercrime Prevention Act, penalties are more severe than traditional libel. Courts may impose fines and imprisonment of up to 12 years.

For slander, penalties vary depending on the gravity of the offense:

  • Simple Slander is punished by arresto menor or a fine.
  • Grave Slander, or slander which is particularly injurious, is punished more severely with arresto mayor.

Remedies for Victims of Defamation

If a person believes they have been defamed, they may take the following steps:

  1. File a Criminal Complaint: A victim can file a complaint for libel or slander before the appropriate prosecutor’s office. If the defamatory statement was made online, a cyber libel case may be filed under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

  2. Civil Action for Damages: The victim may also file a separate civil action for damages under Article 26 of the Civil Code of the Philippines. This civil case seeks compensation for the harm caused to the victim’s reputation.

Practical Considerations

Before filing a case for defamation, it is important to weigh the strength of the evidence. Screenshots, recordings, or witness testimonies may be necessary to prove publication and content. It is also crucial to determine if the statement falls within any defenses, such as privileged communication or lack of malice, which may weaken the case.

The reputation of the parties involved, the setting where the statement was made, and the intent of the statement can all play a significant role in determining whether a statement is indeed defamatory and how the courts may assess it.


In conclusion, defamation, whether written or spoken, is a serious legal matter in the Philippines that can affect a person's personal and professional life. The elements of defamation, including malice, publication, and the defamatory nature of the statement, must all be present to establish a claim. Defenses such as truth and privileged communication may prevent liability. However, in cases where defamatory statements are made electronically, like in group chats, the consequences under cyber libel laws can be more severe.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.