LEGAL ARTICLE: Addressing a Demand Letter for Tree Pruning or Cutting in the Philippines

---

Letter to a Lawyer Regarding the Concern

Dear Attorney,

I am writing to seek legal advice regarding a situation involving a demand letter from our neighbor concerning a mango tree that overhung onto our property and was subsequently pruned as it caused inconvenience and potential damage to our home. The complainant has since relocated to the United States, but the demand letter requests that we appear at the office of their attorney to address the matter.

We wish to understand the legal obligations associated with this demand and whether it is necessary for us to appear at the attorney's office. We also seek guidance on the proper response to such a demand letter under Philippine law, including any potential liabilities and the appropriate course of action to resolve the issue amicably.

Your advice on this matter will be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Concerned Homeowner

---

Comprehensive Discussion on Legal Issues Arising from the Cutting or Pruning of Neighboring Trees in the Philippines

I. Introduction

The rights and obligations surrounding the pruning or cutting of trees that encroach on a neighbor's property are a common source of disputes in the Philippines. This article comprehensively examines the relevant laws, legal remedies, and practical considerations in addressing such matters.

II. Governing Laws and Jurisprudence

1. Civil Code Provisions on Neighborly Relations

   • Article 682: Property owners have the right to cut or prune branches of a neighbor’s tree if they encroach on their property.
   • Article 619: The right to abate a nuisance is recognized, subject to due notice and proportionality of action.

2. New Civil Code on Damage and Nuisance

   • Article 694 defines a nuisance as any act that causes injury or annoyance to others or obstructs the free use of property.
   • Article 697 allows for the summary abatement of a nuisance but must be exercised prudently and with minimal harm.

3. Environmental Laws

   • Presidential Decree No. 953: Protects trees from unnecessary destruction, particularly those classified as heritage or environmentally significant.

4. Jurisprudence
   Philippine courts recognize that overhanging trees may constitute a private nuisance if they cause actual damage or obstruction. However, remedies must balance the right to property and good neighborly relations (e.g., Mendoza v. Coronel, G.R. No. 212822).

III. The Rights of the Property Owner (Recipient of the Demand Letter)

1. Right to Self-Help Abatement

   • If a tree's branches overhang onto a property and pose an immediate danger or inconvenience, the property owner is entitled to prune them. However, this should not extend beyond what is necessary to eliminate the encroachment.

2. Duty to Notify

   • Best practices involve notifying the tree owner before any action is taken, particularly if the tree is located within the boundaries of their property. Failure to notify may lead to liability, even if the pruning is justified.

3. Avoiding Excessive Damage

   • The law prohibits excessive or wanton damage to the tree. Cutting or pruning must be done with care to prevent irreparable harm to the tree or its utility to the owner.

IV. Obligations and Liabilities of the Tree Owner (Complainant)

1. Responsibility for Encroachment

   • The owner of a tree that encroaches onto a neighbor’s property has a duty to address any inconvenience or potential damage caused by the encroachment.

2. Legal Remedies for Damage

   • If the tree owner believes the pruning was excessive or unauthorized, they may seek compensation through legal action, provided they can prove actual harm or loss resulting from the pruning.

3. Demand Letters and Formal Claims

   • A demand letter often serves as a precursor to a legal claim, emphasizing the importance of responding promptly and appropriately to avoid escalation.

V. Responding to the Demand Letter

1. Validity of the Demand

   • Evaluate whether the demand is reasonable and supported by evidence. The absence of actual damage or unlawful actions may render the demand letter unfounded.

2. Necessity of Appearance at the Attorney’s Office

   • Under Philippine law, the recipient of a demand letter is not legally obligated to appear at an attorney’s office. Communication can be done through written responses or through one’s own legal counsel.

3. Recommended Response

   • Draft a formal reply to the demand letter, addressing the claims made and providing evidence (if applicable) that the pruning was lawful and necessary.

VI. Options for Resolution

1. Amicable Settlement

   • Propose a dialogue or settlement to prevent protracted disputes. Mediation may be a practical option if both parties are willing.

2. Counter-Claims

   • If the demand letter includes baseless claims or exaggerations, consider asserting counter-claims for nuisance or harassment.

3. Filing a Complaint Before Barangay

   • Under the Katarungang Pambarangay Law, barangay conciliation is required for disputes between neighbors.

VII. Key Considerations for Compliance

1. Evidence Gathering

   • Document the condition of the tree, the reasons for pruning, and any communications with the neighbor to strengthen your position.

2. Environmental Permits

   • For trees classified as protected, obtain the necessary permits from the DENR or local government before pruning.

3. Good Faith and Proportionality

   • Ensure actions are in good faith and proportionate to the harm caused by the tree encroachment.

VIII. Practical Examples

1. Case Study: Unauthorized Cutting
   A homeowner who pruned a neighbor’s fruit-bearing tree without notification was held liable for damages under Reyes v. Tan due to the economic impact of the loss of fruits.

2. Case Study: Valid Pruning
   In Domingo v. Santiago, the court dismissed a claim for damages when the pruning was found to be necessary and reasonable to protect the homeowner’s property from damage.

IX. Conclusion

Disputes over overhanging trees often stem from a misunderstanding of legal rights and obligations. In addressing such concerns, parties are encouraged to prioritize dialogue and amicable solutions while adhering to the principles of good neighborliness and proportionality.

For recipients of a demand letter, understanding the legal framework and seeking professional legal advice can help ensure a fair resolution to the matter. Responding prudently and with a focus on resolution will often prevent further complications or escalation.