The Legality of Terminating a Probationary Employee on Maternity Leave in the Philippines

Dear Attorney,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to seek your legal counsel regarding a matter that concerns both labor law and maternity protections in the Philippines. Specifically, I would like to understand whether it is lawful for an employer to terminate an employee who is under a probationary period but has gone on maternity leave.

My concern revolves around ensuring that all legal rights and obligations are observed. I would appreciate any guidance you can offer about the proper application of Philippine laws—particularly, how an employer’s discretion to dismiss a probationary employee interfaces with maternity protections mandated by law.

Thank you for your time and expertise. I look forward to your informed opinion on this matter.

Sincerely,
An Inquiring Professional

LEGAL ARTICLE: EXPLORING THE LEGAL PROTECTION AFFORDED TO PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEES ON MATERNITY LEAVE IN THE PHILIPPINES

In the Philippine labor landscape, matters involving employment security, gender equality, and the protection of maternity rights are given significant focus under the Constitution, statutory enactments, and judicial decisions. The question of whether an employer can legally terminate an employee under a probationary status who is on, or about to commence, maternity leave touches on several core legal principles. This discussion aims to provide a comprehensive overview of all pertinent legal provisions, administrative guidelines, and policy considerations that shape the rights and obligations of both employer and employee in such a situation.

1. Constitutional Foundations

Article II, Section 14 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution affirms the State’s commitment to “protect women and their rights” and to ensure “fundamental equality before the law of women and men.” This constitutional mandate forms the foundation upon which Philippine labor statutes and policies stand when they provide for maternity leave benefits and protection from discrimination.

Article XIII on Social Justice and Human Rights further cements the principle that labor laws should promote equal opportunities and foster the welfare of the working class. Hence, the Constitution generally directs the State to protect employees from unjust dismissal while ensuring that employers can still manage their business needs in a fair and lawful manner.

2. Relevant Legislation

There are several legislative enactments that collectively address the rights of pregnant employees, including probationary employees, as well as the obligations of employers. Key among these are:

  1. The Labor Code of the Philippines (Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended)

    • Governs, among others, the nature of employment status, including probationary employment and the grounds for valid dismissal.
    • Article 281 (now renumbered under the Labor Code) outlines that a probationary employment period shall not exceed six months, unless covered by an apprenticeship agreement or unless the employer establishes a longer period for certain roles.
    • Employers must inform the probationary employee of the standards and criteria for regularization at the start of the employment period.

  2. RA No. 9710, or the Magna Carta of Women

    • Enshrines gender equality and includes provisions designed to protect women from discrimination in the workplace.
    • While broad in scope, the Magna Carta of Women reiterates the State policy to defend the rights of women workers, ensuring fair working conditions and non-discriminatory practices.

  3. RA No. 11210, or the Expanded Maternity Leave Law

    • Provides female workers with 105 days of paid maternity leave for live childbirth, regardless of civil status or legitimacy of the child, with an option to extend for an additional 30 days of unpaid leave.
    • Includes a 60-day paid maternity leave for cases of miscarriage or emergency termination of pregnancy.
    • Applies to “every instance of pregnancy,” not restricting coverage only to regular employees. This broad coverage suggests that probationary employees are also entitled to the law’s protections, provided they meet the relevant conditions.

  4. Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) and Social Security System (SSS) Implementing Rules

    • Clarify the process of how maternity benefits are computed and granted, ensuring that female workers, regardless of their status, can avail themselves of the law’s benefits.
    • Typically provide that no employment status distinction disqualifies a pregnant employee from receiving maternity benefits as long as the basic eligibility prerequisites (including SSS membership and required number of monthly contributions) are met.

3. Termination of Employment under Probation

Under Philippine law, a probationary employee enjoys security of tenure, albeit in a somewhat limited sense. An employer may validly terminate a probationary employee for either (a) just or authorized causes as provided by law, or (b) failure to meet the performance standards that were made known to her at the time of engagement.

  1. Just Causes

    • Are acts attributable to the employee that justify dismissal, such as serious misconduct or willful disobedience.
    • The Labor Code requires due process in dismissing an employee, whether the employee is probationary or regular, meaning the twin-notice rule must be observed (notice to explain and notice of decision).

  2. Authorized Causes

    • Relate to business exigencies such as redundancy, retrenchment, or closure of business.
    • Employers must comply with procedural and substantive requirements under the Labor Code, including notice to the DOLE and payment of separation pay (if applicable).

  3. Failure to Meet Reasonable Standards

    • Applies uniquely to probationary employees.
    • For a dismissal to be valid on this ground, it must be shown that (1) there are established standards for regularization, (2) these standards have been communicated to the employee at the time of engagement, (3) the employee fails to meet these standards, and (4) due process is observed.

In the same vein, it is crucial to note that pregnancy or motherhood cannot be equated to a “failure to meet performance standards,” nor can it be considered as grounds to terminate a probationary employee in the absence of legitimate and nondiscriminatory reasons. Philippine laws and jurisprudence strongly prohibit pregnancy-based discrimination.

4. Maternity Leave Protections

The expanded maternity leave benefits and the constitutional policy protecting working women underscore the illegality of dismissing a woman on the grounds of her pregnancy or childbirth. Even if an employee is classified as a probationary worker, it is generally impermissible for an employer to utilize the pregnancy or maternity leave as a reason, direct or indirect, to sever the employment relationship.

Moreover, the legislation is anchored on the social policy of ensuring maternal and child health. The DOLE and the SSS implementing rules bolster this protective policy stance through the mechanism of securing coverage for the mandated maternity benefits. Employers who dismiss pregnant employees based on their physical condition or pregnancy-related absences may be seen as evading their obligations and, as such, risk legal liability.

5. Non-Discrimination Provisions

Philippine law also has specific provisions barring discrimination against female workers:

  • Article 135 of the Labor Code (as renumbered) prohibits discrimination against any woman employee on account of her sex, specifically mentioning wages, promotions, training opportunities, and privileges.
  • Magna Carta of Women (RA 9710) further broadens these protections to combat discrimination in any form.
  • Terminating an employee solely on the basis of her pregnancy can be construed as an unlawful gender-based discrimination, thereby giving rise to possible claims for illegal dismissal and moral and exemplary damages.

While probationary employment naturally carries the risk of non-regularization if performance standards are not met, an employer cannot use pregnancy or maternity leave as an excuse to terminate. Any attempt to do so could be classified as a discriminatory act that contravenes various laws and implementing regulations.

6. Employer’s Burden of Proof

In a case where a pregnant, probationary employee is terminated during her maternity leave—or shortly thereafter—it is generally the employer who carries the burden of proving that the dismissal is lawful. The employer must demonstrate that:

  1. The dismissal is due to just or authorized causes under the Labor Code; or
  2. The employee, despite being informed of the reasonable standards for regularization, failed to meet those standards.

If the employer cannot convincingly establish any lawful ground, the dismissal is considered illegal. This principle aligns with the protective policy that the Labor Code confers upon employees.

7. Remedies and Liabilities for Illegal Dismissal

If a termination is ruled illegal due to discrimination or lack of valid cause, the employee may be entitled to several remedies:

  1. Reinstatement

    • The illegally dismissed employee may be reinstated to her former position without loss of seniority rights.
    • If the position is no longer available, or if reinstatement is impossible, a court may award separation pay as an alternative.

  2. Full Backwages

    • From the time of illegal dismissal until the finality of the decision, the employee may claim all wages she would have earned had she not been dismissed.

  3. Damages

    • Moral and exemplary damages may be awarded where the dismissal was attended by bad faith or was done in a malicious, oppressive, or malevolent manner.
    • If the dismissal arises from discriminatory grounds, courts often grant damages to underscore the State’s strong stance against such illicit treatment.

8. Practical Considerations for Employers and Employees

A. For Employers

  1. Clear Documentation

    • Employers should maintain records of an employee’s performance, compliance, and any warnings or evaluations to support lawful grounds for non-regularization or dismissal.
    • Implement fair and consistent policies, ensuring that pregnancy or maternity leave does not become a disguised cause for termination.

  2. Performance Standards Communication

    • Employers must communicate probationary standards at the outset and apply them uniformly.
    • Even if an employee is on maternity leave, the employer should evaluate performance based on objective metrics and timelines adjusted for lawful leaves.

  3. Policy Reviews

    • Regularly review employee handbooks and policy manuals to ensure compliance with expanded maternity leave laws and anti-discrimination provisions.

  4. Legal Consultation

    • Seek legal advice when contemplating any form of termination, especially one that may implicate sensitive protections such as maternity rights.

B. For Employees

  1. Know Your Rights

    • Familiarize yourself with the provisions of the Labor Code and the Expanded Maternity Leave Law.
    • You have the right to security of tenure and should not be dismissed based on your pregnancy or maternity leave.

  2. Document Communication

    • Preserve all communications, memos, or notices from your employer.
    • When going on maternity leave, ensure proper documentation (medical certificates, SSS notifications, etc.) to avoid misunderstandings.

  3. Prompt Legal Action

    • In cases of suspected illegal dismissal, seek legal assistance immediately.
    • Filing a case or complaint with the DOLE or the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) may be necessary to protect your rights and preserve evidence.

9. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. Can a pregnant employee still be terminated for a valid reason unrelated to pregnancy?

    • Yes, if the dismissal is due to a just or authorized cause as defined under the Labor Code, and there is no discrimination or violation of maternity protections. The mere fact of pregnancy does not grant absolute immunity from termination, but it does protect the employee from pregnancy-based discrimination.

  2. What happens if an employee gives birth close to the end of her probationary period?

    • The employer must assess whether the employee meets the standards for regularization independent of her maternity leave. If she satisfies the criteria, the employer should not terminate her based on the timing of her pregnancy or leave alone.

  3. Are there additional protections under local ordinances or company policies?

    • Some local government units or progressive organizations adopt more extensive maternity protections or benefits. Employers must follow whichever policy or law is more beneficial to the employee, consistent with the principle of non-diminution of benefits.

  4. Can an employer require a pregnant employee on probation to extend her probationary period due to her absence on maternity leave?

    • Generally, probationary periods cannot be extended unless expressly agreed upon by both parties for justifiable reasons (e.g., if the employee’s performance cannot be assessed due to prolonged absence). Nevertheless, the employer should not impose an extension in a way that discriminates or undermines the employee’s maternity rights.

10. Conclusion and Recommendations

In the Philippines, the termination of a probationary employee who is on, or about to take, maternity leave is a legally fraught issue. The law balances two competing interests: (a) the employer’s right to select and retain employees who meet certain performance standards, and (b) the employee’s right to be free from discrimination and to enjoy maternity protections guaranteed by law.

Terminating a pregnant probationary employee merely because she is pregnant or is availing herself of maternity leave is a clear violation of Philippine law. Employers should tread carefully, documenting objective performance issues and ensuring compliance with due process. If a dismissal is needed, it must be supported by a valid and lawful ground unrelated to the employee’s pregnancy or the use of maternity benefits.

For employees, understanding the broad scope of protections accorded by both the Constitution and specific statutes, such as RA No. 11210 (the Expanded Maternity Leave Law) and the Magna Carta of Women, is essential. Documentation, prompt action, and seeking qualified legal assistance are crucial steps in safeguarding one’s rights.

Ultimately, the legal framework in the Philippines reflects a strong policy to protect the welfare of women workers, especially those who are pregnant and at a vulnerable stage of life. It is incumbent upon both employers and employees to navigate the intricacies of labor laws in good faith, adhering to standards of equity, nondiscrimination, and the overarching social justice principles the Constitution envisions. By doing so, workplaces can foster an environment that is both compliant with the law and attuned to the genuine needs of women during and after pregnancy, thereby strengthening the nation’s commitment to uplifting the welfare of Filipino families.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and is not a substitute for tailored legal advice. For specific concerns, it is always prudent to consult directly with a licensed attorney who can properly address your unique circumstances.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login