A.M. No. 10-3-7-SC (The Revised Guidelines on submission of… | Filing and service of pleadings (RULE 13) | Pleadings | CIVIL PROCEDURE

Below is a comprehensive, meticulous discussion of A.M. No. 10-3-7-SC (The Revised Guidelines on Submission of Electronic Copies of Supreme Court-Bound Papers Pursuant to the Efficient Use of Paper Rule), within the context of Rule 13 of the Rules of Court (Filing and Service of Pleadings) and the broader considerations under Remedial Law, Legal Ethics, and Legal Forms. This is designed to give you everything you need to know on the topic:

1. Background and Rationale

  1. Efficient Use of Paper Rule

    • The Efficient Use of Paper Rule was introduced by the Philippine Supreme Court to reduce excessive paper consumption in judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings.
    • Promulgated in A.M. No. 11-9-4-SC, which took effect on January 1, 2013, it set standardized formats for all court-bound pleadings, motions, and other papers (e.g., font size, line spacing, margin requirements).
    • Later refinements included specific rules on electronic submissions to further streamline processes and reduce costs and paper use.

  2. A.M. No. 10-3-7-SC – Revised Guidelines

    • The Revised Guidelines on Submission of Electronic Copies (A.M. No. 10-3-7-SC) complement the Efficient Use of Paper Rule by requiring that, in addition to the printed copies of pleadings submitted to the Supreme Court, parties must also submit electronic copies (on a storage device) of the same documents.
    • These guidelines aim to:
      1. Facilitate the Court’s archiving, retrieval, and distribution of pleadings.
      2. Expedite court procedures by enabling justices and court personnel to access digital versions.
      3. Reduce the voluminous amounts of paper that the Supreme Court receives daily.

2. Scope and Coverage

  1. Types of Papers Covered

    • The rule generally covers all court-bound papers filed with the Supreme Court, including but not limited to:
      • Petitions (e.g., Petitions for Review on Certiorari, Petitions for Certiorari under Rule 65, etc.).
      • Comments, Replies, and other responsive pleadings.
      • Motions, Manifestations, and other written submissions required by the Court.
    • It also extends to other supporting documents attached to these main pleadings (annexes, appendices, exhibits).

  2. Where Mandatory

    • The guidelines specifically apply to cases pending or filed before the Supreme Court. In the lower courts, the traditional submission of printed pleadings remains the norm unless or until the Supreme Court extends the guidelines explicitly.

  3. Parties and Counsels Involved

    • All counsels (both private practitioners and government counsels) and parties representing themselves (in pro se cases) must comply.
    • Failure to submit an electronic copy when mandated can result in the Court imposing sanctions or considering the non-compliant pleading as not filed at all (subject to the Court’s discretion).

3. Key Provisions of the Guidelines

A. Format of Hard (Printed) Copies

Even though the focus is on electronic submission, the Efficient Use of Paper Rule imposes uniform standards for the printed version, which the electronic copy must match exactly:

  1. Paper Size: Standard A4 size (210 mm x 297 mm).
  2. Margins: At least 1.0 inch on all sides.
  3. Font and Font Size:
    • Preferred font: Century Gothic (or similarly compact font).
    • Font size: 12 for text; 14 or larger may be used for headings.
  4. Line Spacing:
    • 1.5 lines between sentences or paragraphs.
    • Single spacing may be used for block quotations, footnotes, and certificates of service/compliance.
  5. Binding:
    • For Supreme Court-bound documents, the guidelines may require that they be “book-bound” or otherwise securely fastened (e.g., ring-bound, velobound) to prevent loss of pages.
  6. Copies Required:
    • The number of printed copies is typically set by the Rules of Court (for instance, the Supreme Court may require the original plus a specific number of copies). Check the latest issuances or internal rules of the Supreme Court for the exact number.

B. Requirements for the Electronic Copy

  1. Content Must Match Printed Version

    • The electronic copy (EC) must be an exact replica of the filed hard copy, including all annexes, attachments, and exhibits. The pagination, the arrangement of documents, and all details (e.g., signatures) should align with the printed version.

  2. File Format

    • Typically required in PDF (Portable Document Format), with text-based encoding rather than image-only (if possible).
    • The Supreme Court favors text-searchable PDFs to facilitate ease of reference, review, and research.

  3. Data Storage Device

    • The electronic copy is usually saved onto a compact disc (CD) or USB flash drive.
    • The guidelines specify labeling the storage medium clearly with the case title, docket number (if already assigned), and the name of the party.
    • The storage device should be accompanied by a signed Certification that it is a faithful reproduction of the hard copy filed.

  4. Separate Folder for Annexes

    • Some Supreme Court instructions advise that annexes be scanned or converted to PDF and placed in a separate folder within the device, properly labeled (e.g., “Annex A,” “Annex B,” etc.), for clarity and easy navigation.

  5. Virus Scanning

    • The party or counsel is generally required to ensure that the CD/USB is virus-free, typically by scanning it with an updated antivirus before submission, as any virus or corrupted file may render it unacceptable.

  6. Deadline for Submission

    • The electronic copy is usually filed together with or within a fixed period after the filing of the hard copies. Any deviation from this (e.g., if the e-copy is not immediately available) must be properly explained in a motion for extension or with leave of court.

C. Certification Requirements

  1. Certification from Counsel

    • A counsel filing a pleading must sign a Certification indicating that the electronic copy is a faithful reproduction of the printed copy.
    • The Certification may be integrated in the main pleading (usually at the end) or attached as a separate page.
    • The Certification helps the Court verify that the electronic version submitted does not differ from the signed, physical version.

  2. Verification of Completeness

    • Counsel or the party must verify that all annexes in the printed version are likewise included in the electronic copy.
    • Inadvertent omissions of annexes or incomplete files can lead to delays or the possibility of the Court considering the pleading incomplete.

4. Practical Considerations and Compliance Tips

  1. Ensuring Consistency

    • The best practice is to prepare the document electronically first, finalize and paginate, and then produce the exact same PDF for printing. This reduces the risk of version discrepancies.
    • Double-check that all pages, including annexes, are scanned in order and that the numbering of annexes in the PDF matches the references in the main text.

  2. Maintaining Readability

    • When scanning or saving to PDF, ensure that scans are clear, text is legible, and the file size remains practical (some courts have size limitations if an e-filing system is used in the future).

  3. Avoiding Common Pitfalls

    • Wrong Paper Size: Submitting on Legal size or Letter size instead of A4 can cause compliance issues.
    • Illegible or Overly Large Scans: Very large PDF files or low-resolution scans can hamper the Court’s usage.
    • Untested Storage Device: CDs or USBs not tested on a different computer may be corrupted, locked, or not readable.
    • Missing or Incorrect Certification: The Certification that the e-copy and hard copy match is a mandatory requirement.

  4. Ethical Considerations

    • As an officer of the Court, a lawyer must ensure the faithful reproduction of all pleadings and annexes and must not manipulate or redact electronically in a way that misleads the Court.
    • Failure to comply accurately with these guidelines or to certify properly can subject the lawyer to disciplinary action and the party to procedural sanctions (e.g., striking out the pleading).

5. Consequences of Non-Compliance

  1. Possible Dismissal or Striking of Pleading
    • Non-compliance can lead the Supreme Court to refuse to take cognizance of the filing or to require the party to correct the deficiency.
  2. Fines or Disciplinary Action
    • For repeated or willful non-compliance, or misrepresentations in the Certification, the counsel may face fines, warnings, or other disciplinary measures.
  3. Additional Orders from the Court
    • The Court may issue show-cause orders or further directives to ensure that parties adhere to the rule and rectify any non-compliance.

6. Relationship to Rule 13 (Filing and Service of Pleadings)

  1. Rule 13, Rules of Court
    • Governs how pleadings and other documents are filed and served in civil cases.
    • Rule 13’s primary modes of filing (personal filing, registered mail, accredited courier, electronic means where allowed) now co-exist with the requirement for electronic copies for Supreme Court-bound documents under A.M. No. 10-3-7-SC.
  2. Not a Substitute for Proper Service
    • Even though an electronic copy must be submitted to the Court, proper service of the printed pleading upon the opposing party or counsel is still required under Rule 13. The e-copy does not replace actual service under the Rules of Court.
  3. Filing Date
    • The filing date is still determined by the date the hard copy is filed (or mailed, etc.). The electronic copy’s submission is essentially an additional requirement, not the basis for determining timeliness (unless the Supreme Court, in a special issuance, specifically states otherwise).

7. Updates and Potential Future Revisions

  1. Continual Policy Development
    • The Supreme Court has been incrementally adopting e-filing and video-conferencing rules in response to modernization and unforeseen circumstances (e.g., public health emergencies).
    • Future A.M. circulars may further refine or expand the electronic submission requirements in other courts beyond the Supreme Court.
  2. Extended E-Filing
    • The Supreme Court has pilot-tested e-filing in certain trial courts, but the comprehensive, nationwide e-filing system is still evolving. Lawyers and litigants should watch for updated Memoranda or Administrative Circulars that might expand or modify the requirements.

8. Summary of Key Points

  • A.M. No. 10-3-7-SC implements the Revised Guidelines on Submission of Electronic Copies for Supreme Court-bound pleadings under the broader Efficient Use of Paper Rule.
  • All Supreme Court-bound pleadings must comply with standardized formatting (A4, margin sizes, font style/size, line spacing) and require an electronic copy—usually in PDF—stored on a labeled CD or USB.
  • Certification by counsel is mandatory, attesting that the e-copy is a faithful reproduction of the printed copy.
  • Non-compliance can result in sanctions, such as striking out the pleading or facing disciplinary action.
  • These requirements supplement the modes of filing under Rule 13, but do not replace the necessity for proper service to the opposing parties.

Final Practical Tip

For practitioners, the most efficient workflow is:

  1. Prepare the entire pleading electronically (including annexes), ensuring compliance with all format rules.
  2. Convert final version to a PDF that is text-searchable (if possible).
  3. Print the required hard copies and save the exact PDF file (with annexes) on a CD/USB.
  4. Label the CD/USB properly and include the required Certification that the electronic copy is faithful.
  5. Submit both the printed copies and the electronic copy at the same time, unless the Court has allowed otherwise.

By following these steps and the details outlined above, counsel will be in full compliance with A.M. No. 10-3-7-SC and the Efficient Use of Paper Rule in Supreme Court-bound matters, avoiding administrative complications and ensuring a smooth filing process.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login