Pre-trial agreement | Pre-trial (RULE 118) | CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

PRE-TRIAL AGREEMENT UNDER RULE 118 OF THE REVISED RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (PHILIPPINES)

Below is a meticulous, straightforward discussion covering what every practitioner should know about Pre-Trial (particularly pre-trial agreements) in criminal cases under Philippine law.

1. OVERVIEW OF PRE-TRIAL IN CRIMINAL CASES

  1. Definition and Purpose

    • Pre-trial is a procedural step conducted after arraignment and before the actual trial.
    • It aims to simplify, define, and limit the issues for trial; encourage the possibility of plea bargaining; explore stipulations or admissions of facts; and facilitate the marking and identification of evidence.
    • By clarifying contested points and formalizing any agreements, pre-trial streamlines the proceedings and prevents unnecessary delays.

  2. Governing Rules

    • Primary authority is Rule 118 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure.
    • The procedure is also complemented by the Revised Guidelines for Continuous Trial (e.g., A.M. No. 15-06-10-SC) and relevant Supreme Court Circulars.

  3. Mandatory Nature

    • Pre-trial is mandatory in all criminal cases cognizable by the trial courts, including cases before the Regional Trial Court (RTC), the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC), Municipal Trial Court (MTC), Municipal Trial Court in Cities (MTCC), Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC), and the Sandiganbayan.
    • The court must set the date for pre-trial within thirty (30) days from the date of arraignment (per the continuous trial guidelines).

2. PERSONS REQUIRED TO ATTEND PRE-TRIAL

  1. Accused and Defense Counsel

    • The accused must personally appear, along with defense counsel (whether privately retained or a public attorney).
    • Failure of the accused to appear may result in sanctions and the proceedings can validly continue in the accused’s absence (though the court typically inquires into the reason for non-appearance).

  2. Prosecution

    • The public prosecutor (or private prosecutor with authority from the public prosecutor) must attend, bringing along all documentary and testimonial evidence for potential marking and identification.

  3. Offended Party or Private Complainant

    • In some cases, especially where civil liability or settlement is at issue, the offended party or private complainant is encouraged (and sometimes directed by the court) to be present to explore settlement or agreements on the civil aspect.

3. SCOPE OF PRE-TRIAL AND MATTERS COVERED

During the pre-trial, the court and the parties shall consider the following:

  1. Plea Bargaining

    • The possibility that the accused will enter a plea of guilty to a lesser offense, subject to the prosecutor’s consent (and, in certain cases, the offended party’s consent if required by law or jurisprudence).
    • If plea bargaining is agreed upon, it is subject to the court’s approval in open court.

  2. Stipulation of Facts and Admissions

    • Parties are encouraged to make stipulations (binding statements of fact) or admissions that will no longer need to be proven during trial.
    • These admissions can significantly reduce the number of witnesses or evidence to be presented.

  3. Marking and Identification of Evidence

    • Both prosecution and defense mark their respective documentary exhibits.
    • This prevents later disputes on authenticity or identification of documents, and expedites the presentation of evidence.

  4. Waiver of Objections

    • The parties may waive objections to the admissibility of exhibits that are properly identified and marked during pre-trial, unless reserved for a specific legal ground (e.g., preserving a constitutional challenge or a chain-of-custody dispute).

  5. Modification of Order of Trial

    • If the accused admits the charge but interposes a lawful defense, the court can alter the usual order of trial to focus on issues of law (e.g., self-defense) rather than issues of identity or commission of the act.

  6. Other Matters

    • Any other issues that would help achieve a fair, expeditious, and economical resolution of the case.
    • Settlement of the civil liability or any restitution arrangement may also be discussed.

4. PRE-TRIAL AGREEMENTS

  1. Nature and Binding Effect

    • All agreements reached (on plea bargaining, stipulations of fact, admissions, evidence, etc.) during pre-trial are reduced to writing in the Pre-Trial Order.
    • Once signed by the parties and the judge, these agreements or stipulations bind the parties and cannot be set aside except to prevent manifest injustice.

  2. Form and Execution

    • The court typically issues a Pre-Trial Order summarizing all actions taken, facts stipulated or admitted, the marked evidence, and any pre-trial agreements.
    • Counsel for the accused must ensure that the accused fully understands any agreements or admissions made (including implications of a guilty plea to a lesser offense).

  3. Role of the Court

    • The judge facilitates negotiations and clarifications but must not coerce or improperly influence any party to admit certain facts or enter a plea.
    • The judge ensures the accused is informed of the rights waived or consequences of admissions, especially if it involves the constitutional right to remain silent or right to trial.

5. PROCEEDINGS AFTER PRE-TRIAL

  1. Issuance of Pre-Trial Order

    • Within a short period (commonly stated as within ten (10) days after pre-trial), the judge issues a Pre-Trial Order. This order controls the subsequent proceedings, including the scope of trial, issues to be resolved, and the evidence to be presented.

  2. Trial Proper

    • The trial proceeds only on the issues left unresolved during pre-trial.
    • Evidence on matters already stipulated or admitted need not be presented again.

  3. Remedies and Objections

    • If a party believes that an item or agreement was wrongly included or omitted in the Pre-Trial Order, that party should timely move for an amendment or correction.
    • Generally, the Pre-Trial Order can be modified only if necessary to prevent manifest injustice and upon a showing of compelling reasons.

6. LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

  1. Duty of Counsel to Client

    • Defense counsel must thoroughly explain all implications of pre-trial agreements, especially the risks of admitting or stipulating facts that could ease the prosecution’s burden of proof.
    • Counsel must ensure the accused’s decisions are made voluntarily and with full understanding of their legal consequences.

  2. Duty of Prosecutor

    • The prosecutor must act impartially in exploring plea bargains, ensuring that any agreement is legally permissible and just.
    • The prosecutor should be prepared to proceed to trial if no agreement is reached.

  3. Integrity of Admissions and Stipulations

    • All stipulations must be made in good faith. There is an ethical obligation to avoid frivolous or misleading stipulations or admissions.

7. PRACTICAL TIPS AND STRATEGIES

  1. Preparation is Key

    • Counsel must thoroughly review the case dossier, the complaint, witnesses’ statements, and potential defenses before the pre-trial conference.
    • Mark potential documentary exhibits in advance; prepare to object to the adversary’s evidence if necessary.

  2. Negotiation for Plea Bargaining

    • If aiming for a lesser offense or a reduced penalty, start discussing these possibilities with the prosecutor ahead of the pre-trial conference.
    • The offended party’s stance may affect the success of plea bargaining, especially in private crimes or serious offenses.

  3. Focus on Key Issues

    • Use stipulations to remove ancillary or uncontested facts from the scope of the trial. This saves time and resources for the truly disputed issues.

  4. Record Everything

    • Ensure that all agreements, admissions, or evidence markings are accurately recorded and that your copy of the Pre-Trial Order matches the court’s.
    • Immediately move to correct any misstatements in the draft pre-trial order before finalization.

  5. Client Consultation

    • Remember that it is ultimately the accused’s right whether or not to admit facts, stipulate, or plead guilty to a lesser offense. Counsel must explain thoroughly but let the accused make the final, informed choice.

8. COMMON PITFALLS

  1. Failure to Prepare Evidence

    • Not having your documentary or testimonial evidence ready can lead to inaccurate marking or missed opportunities to object to the other side’s exhibits.

  2. Coerced or Uninformed Admissions

    • An admission made without the accused’s fully informed consent can be challenged later on—but this can create undue complications and potential prejudice.

  3. Omission of Crucial Issues in Pre-Trial Order

    • If a significant defense or evidentiary objection is not explicitly included or reserved in the Pre-Trial Order, you risk being barred from raising it at trial (absent a showing of manifest injustice).

  4. Ignoring the Civil Aspect

    • Failing to address the civil liability portion (especially in cases involving property or personal injury) can prolong the litigation or lead to incomplete resolution.

9. CONCLUSION

A Pre-Trial Agreement under Rule 118 is a cornerstone of efficient criminal litigation in the Philippines. It narrows down the issues, streamlines evidence, and often provides an opportunity for plea bargaining or settlement on the civil aspect. Properly handled, pre-trial can save valuable court time and resources, while improperly handled, it can irreversibly undermine a party’s position at trial.

Key reminders for counsel:

  • Thorough preparation and client consultation are indispensable.
  • All agreements must be clear, unambiguous, and voluntary.
  • The Pre-Trial Order controls the ensuing trial; review it carefully and promptly seek corrections if needed.

Ultimately, the goal of pre-trial is to promote a fair and expeditious resolution of the criminal case—both for the accused and the prosecution—under the guiding principles of justice and due process.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login