Pre-trial RULE 118

Cases for mediation on the civil liability | Pre-trial (RULE 118) | CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Below is a comprehensive, straightforward discussion of Cases for Mediation on the Civil Liability during Pre-trial under Rule 118 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure (Philippines), including the pertinent rules, procedures, and practical considerations. This is presented in an organized manner for clarity:

1. Legal Framework and Governing Issuances

  1. Rule 118 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure

    • Governs pre-trial in criminal cases.
    • Enumerates the matters to be considered during pre-trial, such as plea bargaining, stipulation of facts, marking of evidence, and other matters that will promote a fair and expeditious trial.
    • Section 2(g) of Rule 118 expressly includes the possibility of referring the civil aspect of the case to alternative dispute resolution (e.g., mediation), whenever feasible.

  2. 2017 Revised Guidelines on Continuous Trial of Criminal Cases

    • Issued by the Supreme Court to expedite the resolution of criminal cases.
    • Specifically encourages courts to explore court-annexed mediation (CAM) or judicial dispute resolution (JDR) for the civil aspect of certain criminal cases, in order to promote settlements, decongest dockets, and expedite proceedings.

  3. Administrative and OCA Circulars on Court-Annexed Mediation

    • The Supreme Court, through the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA), has issued circulars identifying which cases are subject to mediation on the civil aspect, how such mediation is to be conducted, and which Philippine Mediation Centers will assist the court.
    • Commonly, crimes involving private interests (like BP 22 violations, theft, estafa, and libel) are prime candidates for mediation of the civil liability.

2. Purpose and Scope of Mediation in Criminal Cases

  • Civil Liability vs. Criminal Liability

    • In a criminal prosecution, the People of the Philippines prosecutes the criminal aspect, whereas the offended or injured party may pursue the civil aspect of the offense (i.e., indemnity, damages, restitution).
    • When a criminal action is filed, the civil action for damages is impliedly instituted with it unless the private offended party waives the civil action, or expressly reserves the right to file it separately.
    • Mediation, in the context of criminal cases, focuses on settling or compromising the civil liability (monetary restitution, indemnification, or damages). It does not extinguish the criminal liability unless the law allows it (e.g., for certain private crimes or where an affidavit of desistance can affect prosecutorial discretion).

  • Why Refer to Mediation?

    1. Judicial Efficiency – Helps decongest court dockets by resolving the civil aspect out of court.
    2. Restorative Justice – Encourages reconciliation between parties when feasible and appropriate.
    3. Flexibility in Settlement – Allows the parties, under the guidance of a neutral mediator, to craft creative solutions (payment schedules, partial restitution, or other terms) that might not otherwise be available in a strictly adversarial trial.

  • Cases Generally Eligible for Mediation of the Civil Aspect

    1. Batas Pambansa Blg. 22 (Bouncing Checks Law)
    2. Estafa (Article 315, Revised Penal Code)
    3. Theft (Article 308, RPC) – Especially if the accused or defense contemplates returning or paying for the property taken.
    4. Libel or Defamation Cases – The civil liability for moral and/or exemplary damages may be mediated.
    5. Other Offenses with a Private Offended Party – Especially where restitution or damages are quantifiable.

Note: Very serious crimes (e.g., murder, homicide, serious physical injuries) are generally not referred for mediation of civil liability, but courts still have the discretion to explore partial civil settlement if the offended party so desires—though it is less common.

3. Procedure for Referral to Mediation During Pre-trial

  1. Initiation at Pre-trial

    • Under Rule 118, the judge convenes a pre-trial conference to discuss and consider matters that would aid in a fair and speedy disposition of the case.
    • The judge must inquire if the parties are amenable to discuss or settle the civil aspect of the offense.

  2. Court’s Discretion or Party’s Motion

    • The court may, motu proprio, refer the civil aspect to mediation if it sees that an amicable settlement is feasible (especially in financial or property-related offenses).
    • The prosecution or the defense (or the offended party) may also move for mediation. If the judge finds it appropriate, the matter is referred to the Philippine Mediation Center (PMC) or an accredited mediator.

  3. Suspension of Proceedings on the Civil Aspect

    • Once referred, proceedings on the civil aspect are held in abeyance while mediation is ongoing. The criminal proceedings themselves, however, can continue for arraignment and other preliminary matters if the court deems it so, subject to the Continuous Trial Guidelines.
    • The judge may set a specific timeframe for the mediation process to avoid undue delay.

  4. Mediation Sessions

    • Conducted confidentially by a duly accredited mediator (often from the PMC).
    • Parties have the freedom to propose, accept, or reject settlement terms.
    • The objective is to arrive at a settlement agreement covering indemnity, damages, restitution, or any other form of civil reparation.

  5. Return to Court

    • If mediation succeeds, the parties submit a Compromise Agreement (or “Settlement Agreement”) on the civil aspect to the trial court for approval and/or judgment upon compromise.
    • If mediation fails, the case proceeds to trial on both criminal and civil aspects.

4. Effects of a Successful Mediation on the Civil Aspect

  1. Approval by the Court

    • The court will review the compromise agreement. If it finds the agreement to be voluntary, legal, and reasonable, it will approve it.
    • The agreement is binding upon the parties with respect to the civil liability.

  2. Impact on Criminal Liability

    • As a rule, settlement of the civil liability does not automatically extinguish the criminal liability.
    • Criminal liability remains a matter for the prosecution to pursue in the name of the People of the Philippines. The case typically proceeds, unless:
      • The law itself provides that extinguishing the civil liability necessarily extinguishes the criminal (e.g., in certain private crimes, or in special laws if settlement is a recognized mode of extinguishment), or
      • An affidavit of desistance plus other grounds lead the prosecution or the court to dismiss or provisionally dismiss the criminal case (although an affidavit of desistance is generally not alone a ground for outright dismissal).
    • Nonetheless, in some crimes like BP 22, full restitution or settlement can weigh heavily in plea bargaining or might prompt the prosecution or court to consider a lesser penalty, or in rare instances, a dismissal if justified by law, rules, or jurisprudence.

  3. Entry of Judgment on the Civil Aspect

    • The compromise agreement, once judicially approved, can be executed like a final judgment on civil liability.
    • If the accused (or the liable party) defaults on the terms of settlement, the offended party may move for execution of the compromise agreement.

  4. Possible Mitigating Effect in Sentencing

    • In some instances, voluntary restitution before final judgment can be viewed as a mitigating circumstance in criminal sentencing (though not formally listed in the Revised Penal Code, it may influence the court’s appreciation of mitigating circumstances such as voluntary surrender or plea of guilty).
    • Courts typically look favorably on genuine efforts to make amends to the offended party.

5. Practical and Ethical Considerations

  1. Lawyer’s Role

    • Duty to Clients: Lawyers for both the prosecution (private complainant) and defense have an ethical obligation to ensure that any settlement is fair, legal, and in the best interests of their client(s).
    • Candor to the Court: Must promptly inform the court of any settlement or partial settlement achieved in mediation.
    • Avoiding Delay: Lawyers should not use the mediation referral to unduly stall the criminal proceedings; the courts are vigilant to avoid dilatory tactics.

  2. Confidentiality

    • Mediation discussions are confidential. Admissions, offers, or concessions made during mediation typically cannot be used against a party if mediation fails and the case proceeds to full trial.
    • The idea is to promote open dialogue without fear that such admissions will be used adversely later in court.

  3. Ethical Prohibitions on Certain Offenses

    • Even if mediation is permissible, it must not violate public policy or laws prohibiting compromise of certain criminal offenses (e.g., compromise of serious crimes or “compounding a crime” is generally disallowed).
    • Where the public interest is paramount, mediation on civil liability might be limited or not feasible.

  4. Drafting the Settlement Agreement

    • Must be clear, complete, and specific (e.g., the exact amount or terms of payment, schedule of payments, interest or penalties for delay, effect of partial default, etc.).
    • Should ensure legally valid consideration so as to stand scrutiny upon court approval.

6. Key Takeaways

  1. Mandatory Pre-trial Under Rule 118

    • Parties and the court must explore all avenues for a swift disposition of the criminal case, including settlement of the civil liability.

  2. Mediation Is Strongly Encouraged

    • Especially for crimes primarily involving private or financial injury, the Supreme Court actively promotes mediation to settle the civil aspect, reduce court backlog, and foster restitution or reconciliation.

  3. Separate Treatment of Criminal and Civil Aspects

    • While mediation can fully settle the civil aspect, the criminal aspect remains within the domain of the People of the Philippines. A successful civil settlement does not, by itself, automatically terminate the criminal prosecution, unless specific legal grounds allow it.

  4. Court Approval and Execution

    • Any agreement reached must be reported to the court for approval. Once approved, it acquires the force of a final judgment on civil liability and can be enforced accordingly.

  5. Practical Benefits

    • For the offended party: Quicker compensation and closure.
    • For the accused: Possible favorable consideration in sentencing, or facilitation of plea bargaining.
    • For the judiciary: Reduced docket congestion and expedited resolution of criminal cases.

Final Word

Mediation on the civil liability during the criminal pre-trial (Rule 118) embodies both restorative justice and the Supreme Court’s goal of promoting expeditious proceedings. Lawyers and litigants should be fully aware of the scope, procedure, and legal effect of such mediation—knowing that while it can provide a pathway for amicable settlement of the civil aspect, it does not automatically extinguish criminal liability unless provided by law. Properly employed, mediation serves the interests of justice, efficiency, and the parties’ own practical needs.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Pre-trial order | Pre-trial (RULE 118) | CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Below is a comprehensive, meticulous discussion of the Pre-trial Order under Rule 118 (Pre-Trial) of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure in the Philippines. While this aims to be as thorough as possible, please remember that this is for informational purposes only and does not constitute formal legal advice.

I. OVERVIEW OF PRE-TRIAL IN CRIMINAL CASES

A. Legal Basis

  1. Rule 118, Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure (as amended) provides for the conduct of pre-trial in criminal cases.
  2. Purpose: The rule aims to expedite the trial, simplify issues, discuss possible stipulations and admissions, and explore plea bargaining and other matters that help secure a just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of cases.

B. Mandatory Nature of Pre-Trial

  1. Mandatory Conduct: Courts are required to conduct pre-trial in every criminal case cognizable by the Regional Trial Courts (RTC) and the Metropolitan/ Municipal Trial Courts except in summary procedure cases unless otherwise ordered by the court.
  2. Personal Presence of the Accused and Counsel: The presence of the accused and his/her counsel (as well as the public prosecutor or private prosecutor, if applicable) is required. The court may not proceed with pre-trial in the absence of the accused (unless properly justified), as it might violate the accused’s rights.

II. KEY FEATURES OF PRE-TRIAL UNDER RULE 118

  1. Plea Bargaining – The court and the parties explore the possibility of the accused pleading guilty to a lesser offense with the consent of the offended party (if required by law) and the prosecutor.
  2. Stipulation of Facts – The parties identify and agree on certain facts that are no longer in dispute, thus reducing the facts that need to be proven during trial.
  3. Marking of Evidence – Prosecution and defense produce the evidence they intend to offer at trial, which will later be marked and identified during the preliminary conference or during pre-trial itself.
  4. Waiver of Objections to Admissibility – The parties may agree on the admissibility or waiver of certain pieces of evidence, minimizing evidentiary issues that might prolong the trial.
  5. Modification of Charges – If appropriate, or if the prosecutor and the accused reach an agreement (subject to court approval), charges may be modified or amended, consistent with the Rules and the protection of the accused’s constitutional rights.
  6. Other Matters – This includes resolving pending motions, discussing the need for a preliminary conference, clarifying defenses, and laying down the timeline and sequence of witnesses.

III. THE PRE-TRIAL ORDER: DEFINITION AND PURPOSE

A. Definition

A Pre-trial Order is the written directive issued by the court after the pre-trial conference. It is a detailed document that memorializes all actions taken, matters agreed upon, stipulations or admissions made, and other rulings rendered during the pre-trial stage.

B. Purpose and Importance

  1. Sets the Boundaries of the Trial
    The pre-trial order circumscribes the issues to be tried. It serves as a blueprint for the trial, ensuring that the parties and the court focus on the resolved and unresolved matters identified at the pre-trial.
  2. Locks in Stipulations and Admissions
    Stipulated facts and admitted matters become conclusive between the parties, avoiding further litigation on those points. These stipulations facilitate a faster disposition of the case.
  3. Promotes Judicial Efficiency
    By reducing the issues and enumerating evidence, the pre-trial order streamlines the subsequent proceedings.
  4. Prevents Unfair Surprises
    Each party has notice of the evidence and issues. The court can disallow the presentation of evidence not previously identified or issues not previously raised (absent good cause).

IV. CONTENTS OF THE PRE-TRIAL ORDER

Under Rule 118, the Pre-trial Order should contain the following essential elements:

  1. Matters Taken Up
    A clear statement of the matters discussed and acted upon during the pre-trial, such as:

    • Plea bargaining proposals
    • Admissibility of documentary and object evidence
    • Possible stipulations and admissions
    • Any modifications or amendments to the information (with court approval)

  2. Facts Stipulated and Admitted

    • All the facts that have been agreed upon by the prosecution and the defense, including any admissions made by the accused.
    • Factual and legal issues that remain contested.

  3. Marked Evidence

    • A list or description of exhibits marked for the prosecution and the defense.
    • Any agreements on the authenticity of documents or objects.

  4. Witnesses

    • A list of the witnesses to be presented by each party.
    • Any agreed-upon matters that will streamline witness testimony (e.g., judicial affidavits, modifications of the order of presentation, etc.).

  5. Deadlines and Timelines

    • Specific schedules for further hearings or conferences, including dates for presentation of witnesses and evidence.

  6. Binding Effects

    • A declaration that stipulations, admissions, and rulings in the pre-trial order are binding, subject only to exceptions allowed by law or extraordinary circumstances.

  7. Other Directives or Conditions

    • Any directives from the court as to the manner of conducting the trial, or special orders needed for the protection of witnesses, the production of documents, or other logistical issues.

V. ISSUANCE AND EFFECT OF THE PRE-TRIAL ORDER

  1. Immediate Issuance

    • The trial court is mandated to issue the pre-trial order promptly after the pre-trial conference, often within a specific period set by internal guidelines or the court’s practice.

  2. Immutability Rule

    • As a rule, once the pre-trial order is issued, it governs the subsequent course of the trial. The parties (and even the court) cannot easily deviate from it without a clear showing of good cause or to prevent manifest injustice.

  3. Control of Proceedings

    • The court will rely on the pre-trial order to control the trial proceedings, ensuring that the parties adhere to what was agreed upon or resolved during pre-trial.

VI. CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE OR FAILURE TO ISSUE A PRE-TRIAL ORDER

  1. Possible Grounds for Reversal on Appeal

    • A court’s failure to conduct a pre-trial or to issue a pre-trial order can be a serious procedural defect. However, the failure to issue a formal pre-trial order will not necessarily void the entire proceedings if the record otherwise shows that the purpose of the pre-trial and the matters required to be stated in the order have been substantially complied with.

  2. Waiver of Objections

    • Parties who fail to raise objections or issues during pre-trial may be deemed to have waived them, absent compelling reasons.

  3. Exclusion of Evidence

    • Evidence not disclosed or marked at pre-trial (or by the appropriate cut-off date set in the pre-trial order) can be disallowed unless the court grants leave for its presentation in the interest of justice.

  4. Sanctions on Counsel or Parties

    • If counsel or the accused fails to appear without valid justification, the court may impose sanctions, including disciplinary action against counsel or the issuance of a warrant of arrest for the accused.

VII. RELATION TO LEGAL ETHICS AND LEGAL FORMS

A. Ethical Considerations for Lawyers

  1. Candor with the Court
    • Lawyers have the ethical responsibility to fully disclose and be honest with the court during pre-trial. Concealment of evidence or misleading stipulations can result in disciplinary action.
  2. Duty to Expedite Litigation
    • Counsel must cooperate in good faith to achieve the objectives of pre-trial, consistent with the Lawyer’s Oath and the Code of Professional Responsibility, which require lawyers to prevent delay in the administration of justice.

B. Drafting the Pre-Trial Order and Other Legal Forms

  1. Court-Prepared vs. Counsel-Prepared
    • Often the judge or court clerk prepares the official pre-trial order. However, parties’ drafts or joint statements (if the court so directs) may be incorporated.
  2. Use of Standard Templates
    • Some courts utilize templates or checklists to ensure uniformity and completeness. Counsel should be prepared to provide the relevant data and sign off on the form as required.
  3. Proposed Stipulations
    • Parties may submit proposed stipulations or admissions in writing prior to the pre-trial conference. These can be integrated into the pre-trial order upon approval or concurrence of the court.

VIII. RELEVANT JURISPRUDENCE AND GUIDELINES

  1. Jurisprudential Emphasis
    • The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that the pre-trial order binds the parties to the facts and issues defined therein. Failure to abide by it is frowned upon and may expose counsel to liability and hamper the client’s interest.
  2. Leading Cases
    • Cases such as People v. Mateo, People v. Hernandez, and People v. Cachola underscore the importance of strict compliance with pre-trial requirements, including the necessity of a comprehensive pre-trial order to ensure that the proceedings are fair and efficient.
  3. Court Issuances and Circulars
    • The Supreme Court occasionally issues administrative circulars reminding judges and lawyers to hold full-blown pre-trial conferences and to issue timely pre-trial orders for better case flow management.

IX. BEST PRACTICES FOR COUNSEL

  1. Preparation
    • Thoroughly review the information, documentary evidence, and witness statements. Draft proposed stipulations. Identify potential evidence to ensure they are all marked and discussed at pre-trial.
  2. Accuracy
    • Double-check all details that will be reflected in the pre-trial order, as mistakes or omissions can seriously affect the presentation of the case.
  3. Active Participation
    • Actively engage in the pre-trial conference. Silence or inaction may be construed as a waiver of certain issues or objections.
  4. Follow-Up
    • Make sure to obtain a copy of the pre-trial order and review it promptly to confirm that all the agreed points are accurately reflected. If corrections are needed, immediately file a motion for correction or reconsideration.
  5. Respect Deadlines
    • Strictly comply with the timelines set in the pre-trial order, especially regarding the filing of motions, submission of judicial affidavits, and presentation of witnesses.

X. CONCLUSION

The Pre-trial Order under Rule 118 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure is a vital instrument that shapes the conduct of criminal proceedings. It reflects the agreements, admissions, and delineated issues between the prosecution and defense and serves as the definitive guide for the trial proper. Non-compliance or omissions in the pre-trial process or the pre-trial order can adversely affect the administration of justice and the rights of the accused.

Hence, it is incumbent upon all parties—judges, prosecutors, defense counsel, and the accused—to ensure a complete, accurate, and timely issuance of the pre-trial order. When properly observed, it materially contributes to the fair, orderly, and expeditious resolution of criminal cases.

Disclaimer: This discussion is provided for informational purposes and is not a substitute for independent legal advice. For specific situations, always seek professional guidance from a duly licensed Philippine attorney.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Non-appearance at pre-trial conference | Pre-trial (RULE 118) | CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

COMPREHENSIVE DISCUSSION ON NON-APPEARANCE AT THE PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
(Rule 118 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, Philippines)

I. OVERVIEW OF PRE-TRIAL UNDER RULE 118

  1. Nature and Purpose of Pre-trial

    • Pre-trial is mandatory in all criminal cases. The court must conduct it right after arraignment and within thirty (30) days from the date the court acquires jurisdiction over the person of the accused.
    • The principal objectives include:
      1. Plea bargaining;
      2. Stipulation of facts;
      3. Marking and comparison of evidence;
      4. Waiver of objections;
      5. Other matters to promote a fair and expeditious trial.

  2. Who Must Appear

    • Accused
    • Defense Counsel
    • Prosecutor
    • Private offended party (if any) or counsel where there is a civil liability to be recovered

    The judge shall ensure that all relevant parties are present, or at the very least, properly represented if justifiable reasons exist for personal non-appearance (e.g., an accused in custody but with counsel present and specifically authorized to represent him).

  3. Importance of Pre-trial

    • Pre-trial narrows down the issues and streamlines the presentation of evidence.
    • It avoids unnecessary delays and facilitates the speedy disposition of cases.
    • Admissions during pre-trial bind the parties, simplifying trial.

II. LEGAL BASIS AND GUIDING PROVISIONS

Relevant sections under Rule 118 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure (as amended) govern pre-trial. While the rule does not contain a single “non-appearance” or “default” provision similar to that in civil cases, it imposes a mandatory duty to appear and contemplates sanctions for unjustified absence.

Key provisions to note:

  • Section 1 (Rule 118) – Mandates the holding of pre-trial after arraignment.
  • Section 2 (Rule 118) – Enumerates the matters to be considered during pre-trial (plea bargaining, stipulation of facts, marking of exhibits, etc.).
  • Section 3 (Rule 118) – Requires that all agreements or admissions be in writing, signed by the accused and counsel, and approved by the court.
  • Section 4 (Rule 118) – Addresses the pre-trial order which recites the actions taken, facts stipulated, evidence marked, admissions made, and deals with other matters agreed upon.

While Rule 118 does not expressly outline a detailed penalty for non-appearance, the general powers of the court, provisions on postponement, and doctrines in legal ethics and contempt rules fill in the gaps.

III. CONSEQUENCES OF NON-APPEARANCE AT PRE-TRIAL

  1. Waiver of Rights or Objections

    • If the accused voluntarily and unjustifiably fails to appear, some courts may consider it a waiver of the right to participate in the pre-trial’s critical components, such as stipulation of facts and marking of evidence.
    • The court may allow the prosecution to present evidence in the absence of the accused’s active participation (though the court cannot proceed to trial proper without the accused unless validly justified or the accused had already been arraigned and is in custody or on bail with counsel present).

  2. Admissions and Stipulations

    • Should defense counsel appear but the accused does not, the lawyer (if empowered with proper authority) could enter into valid stipulations. The written pre-trial agreement or pre-trial order, once signed and approved by the court, is binding.
    • Conversely, if the defense counsel also fails to appear, there can be no valid stipulation. The prosecutor may request the court to note the non-appearance and proceed with the marking of evidence. Ultimately, the counsel’s absence can hamper the defense’s ability to challenge or object to prosecution evidence at this early stage.

  3. Contempt of Court or Administrative Sanctions

    • Lawyers who neglect or refuse to attend scheduled pre-trial without valid cause may be cited in contempt of court.
    • Repeated or gross non-appearance can lead to disciplinary action under the Code of Professional Responsibility, as it is a lawyer’s duty to appear, to be punctual, and to be prepared.

  4. Forfeiture of Bail / Issuance of Warrant

    • If an accused is on bail and simply refuses to attend pre-trial without plausible excuse, the court may order the forfeiture of bail and the issuance of a warrant of arrest. This enforces the mandatory nature of pre-trial and ensures the presence of the accused at crucial stages of the proceedings.

  5. Delay or Rescheduling

    • The non-appearance of either counsel or the accused can result in postponement. However, courts now tend to be more stringent in granting postponements to avoid delay. Courts may impose fines, issue warnings, or adopt other measures to dissuade further non-compliance.

  6. Pre-trial Order Despite Absence

    • The court has the discretion to issue a pre-trial order summarizing what happened on record (including the non-appearance of the party) and proceed to trial in a manner that does not unduly prejudice the present parties.
    • Any attempt to later question the matters that could have been addressed or objected to during pre-trial may be deemed waived.

IV. LEGAL ETHICS DIMENSION

  1. Duty of Counsel to Appear

    • Under the Code of Professional Responsibility, counsel must not unduly impede the administration of justice. Failing to appear at scheduled settings, especially mandatory ones like pre-trial, can be deemed an act of professional misconduct if done habitually or without justification.
    • Canon 12 (CPR) states that a lawyer shall exert every effort to assist in the speedy and efficient administration of justice. Non-appearance at a mandatory pre-trial defeats this objective.

  2. Obligation to Clients

    • Lawyers are bound to protect their clients’ interests zealously and competently. Missing a pre-trial can prejudice the client’s position, as they lose the opportunity to:
      • Explore plea bargaining.
      • Limit or clarify issues.
      • Stipulate beneficial facts.
      • Mark evidence.
    • If a lawyer’s absence results in adverse rulings or waivers, it may expose the lawyer to potential liability or administrative sanction.

V. PROCEDURAL BEST PRACTICES

  1. Prior Authorization and Notice

    • If the accused is detained, ensure that the necessary motion or order is issued to produce the accused at pre-trial.
    • If the accused cannot personally appear for a valid reason (e.g., illness, travel restrictions, etc.), the lawyer must file a motion to excuse appearance or for postponement well ahead of the pre-trial date.

  2. Preparation of Documents

    • In anticipation of pre-trial, both prosecution and defense should prepare:
      • Proposed stipulations.
      • Lists of witnesses.
      • Marked documentary exhibits.
      • Motions for consolidation/separation of trials (if needed).

  3. Coordination with Opposing Counsel

    • Engage in preliminary discussions on possible stipulations to streamline the pre-trial.
    • Explore plea bargaining if the case or evidence so warrants.

  4. Ensuring the Accused’s Understanding

    • Counsel should explain the importance of pre-trial to the accused. In criminal cases, the accused’s presence is crucial not only to protect rights but also to personally make decisions on offers for plea bargaining and to understand the import of stipulations.

VI. CASE LAW REFERENCES

Although the Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure do not specify a single controlling case for “non-appearance” during pre-trial, the Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized:

  • Speedy disposition of cases and the mandatory nature of pre-trial (e.g., People v. Arrojado, G.R. No. 139813).
  • Potential waiver of objections when parties fail to assert them at the pre-trial stage (e.g., People v. Enojas Jr., G.R. No. 127849).
  • Court’s discretion to mete out sanctions for lawyers who cause delay (e.g., Spouses David v. Tongol, A.C. No. 7053).

In sum, jurisprudence supports the idea that non-appearance at pre-trial can have serious repercussions for both the litigants and their counsel, given the policy of expeditious administration of justice.

VII. SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS

  1. Mandatory Proceeding – Pre-trial is an indispensable part of the criminal process; attendance is not optional.
  2. Consequences of Non-Appearance – May include waiver of rights, forfeiture of bail, possible contempt or administrative sanctions against counsel, and prejudice to the absent party’s legal and factual defenses.
  3. Legal Ethics Aspect – Counsel must ensure attendance, preparedness, and sincerity in pre-trial to uphold the ethics of the profession and protect the client’s interest.
  4. Practical Tips – Obtain court approval for any justified non-appearance, coordinate with the prosecution/defense for stipulations, and prepare thoroughly to secure the best outcome.
  5. Court Discretion – The court wields considerable authority to impose fines, treat absence as waiver, or even proceed to trial with such adverse inferences or sanctions as warranted.

VIII. CONCLUSION

Failure to appear at a mandatory pre-trial conference in a criminal case under Rule 118 can severely compromise a party’s position and result in disciplinary consequences for counsel. The rules and jurisprudence underscore the importance of diligently attending and participating in pre-trial for an efficient and fair administration of justice. Counsel and accused must be mindful that any unjustified absence may lead to waivers of certain rights, potential sanctions, and procedural disadvantages that can irreversibly affect the outcome of the case.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Pre-trial agreement | Pre-trial (RULE 118) | CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

PRE-TRIAL AGREEMENT UNDER RULE 118 OF THE REVISED RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (PHILIPPINES)

Below is a meticulous, straightforward discussion covering what every practitioner should know about Pre-Trial (particularly pre-trial agreements) in criminal cases under Philippine law.

1. OVERVIEW OF PRE-TRIAL IN CRIMINAL CASES

  1. Definition and Purpose

    • Pre-trial is a procedural step conducted after arraignment and before the actual trial.
    • It aims to simplify, define, and limit the issues for trial; encourage the possibility of plea bargaining; explore stipulations or admissions of facts; and facilitate the marking and identification of evidence.
    • By clarifying contested points and formalizing any agreements, pre-trial streamlines the proceedings and prevents unnecessary delays.

  2. Governing Rules

    • Primary authority is Rule 118 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure.
    • The procedure is also complemented by the Revised Guidelines for Continuous Trial (e.g., A.M. No. 15-06-10-SC) and relevant Supreme Court Circulars.

  3. Mandatory Nature

    • Pre-trial is mandatory in all criminal cases cognizable by the trial courts, including cases before the Regional Trial Court (RTC), the Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC), Municipal Trial Court (MTC), Municipal Trial Court in Cities (MTCC), Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC), and the Sandiganbayan.
    • The court must set the date for pre-trial within thirty (30) days from the date of arraignment (per the continuous trial guidelines).

2. PERSONS REQUIRED TO ATTEND PRE-TRIAL

  1. Accused and Defense Counsel

    • The accused must personally appear, along with defense counsel (whether privately retained or a public attorney).
    • Failure of the accused to appear may result in sanctions and the proceedings can validly continue in the accused’s absence (though the court typically inquires into the reason for non-appearance).

  2. Prosecution

    • The public prosecutor (or private prosecutor with authority from the public prosecutor) must attend, bringing along all documentary and testimonial evidence for potential marking and identification.

  3. Offended Party or Private Complainant

    • In some cases, especially where civil liability or settlement is at issue, the offended party or private complainant is encouraged (and sometimes directed by the court) to be present to explore settlement or agreements on the civil aspect.

3. SCOPE OF PRE-TRIAL AND MATTERS COVERED

During the pre-trial, the court and the parties shall consider the following:

  1. Plea Bargaining

    • The possibility that the accused will enter a plea of guilty to a lesser offense, subject to the prosecutor’s consent (and, in certain cases, the offended party’s consent if required by law or jurisprudence).
    • If plea bargaining is agreed upon, it is subject to the court’s approval in open court.

  2. Stipulation of Facts and Admissions

    • Parties are encouraged to make stipulations (binding statements of fact) or admissions that will no longer need to be proven during trial.
    • These admissions can significantly reduce the number of witnesses or evidence to be presented.

  3. Marking and Identification of Evidence

    • Both prosecution and defense mark their respective documentary exhibits.
    • This prevents later disputes on authenticity or identification of documents, and expedites the presentation of evidence.

  4. Waiver of Objections

    • The parties may waive objections to the admissibility of exhibits that are properly identified and marked during pre-trial, unless reserved for a specific legal ground (e.g., preserving a constitutional challenge or a chain-of-custody dispute).

  5. Modification of Order of Trial

    • If the accused admits the charge but interposes a lawful defense, the court can alter the usual order of trial to focus on issues of law (e.g., self-defense) rather than issues of identity or commission of the act.

  6. Other Matters

    • Any other issues that would help achieve a fair, expeditious, and economical resolution of the case.
    • Settlement of the civil liability or any restitution arrangement may also be discussed.

4. PRE-TRIAL AGREEMENTS

  1. Nature and Binding Effect

    • All agreements reached (on plea bargaining, stipulations of fact, admissions, evidence, etc.) during pre-trial are reduced to writing in the Pre-Trial Order.
    • Once signed by the parties and the judge, these agreements or stipulations bind the parties and cannot be set aside except to prevent manifest injustice.

  2. Form and Execution

    • The court typically issues a Pre-Trial Order summarizing all actions taken, facts stipulated or admitted, the marked evidence, and any pre-trial agreements.
    • Counsel for the accused must ensure that the accused fully understands any agreements or admissions made (including implications of a guilty plea to a lesser offense).

  3. Role of the Court

    • The judge facilitates negotiations and clarifications but must not coerce or improperly influence any party to admit certain facts or enter a plea.
    • The judge ensures the accused is informed of the rights waived or consequences of admissions, especially if it involves the constitutional right to remain silent or right to trial.

5. PROCEEDINGS AFTER PRE-TRIAL

  1. Issuance of Pre-Trial Order

    • Within a short period (commonly stated as within ten (10) days after pre-trial), the judge issues a Pre-Trial Order. This order controls the subsequent proceedings, including the scope of trial, issues to be resolved, and the evidence to be presented.

  2. Trial Proper

    • The trial proceeds only on the issues left unresolved during pre-trial.
    • Evidence on matters already stipulated or admitted need not be presented again.

  3. Remedies and Objections

    • If a party believes that an item or agreement was wrongly included or omitted in the Pre-Trial Order, that party should timely move for an amendment or correction.
    • Generally, the Pre-Trial Order can be modified only if necessary to prevent manifest injustice and upon a showing of compelling reasons.

6. LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

  1. Duty of Counsel to Client

    • Defense counsel must thoroughly explain all implications of pre-trial agreements, especially the risks of admitting or stipulating facts that could ease the prosecution’s burden of proof.
    • Counsel must ensure the accused’s decisions are made voluntarily and with full understanding of their legal consequences.

  2. Duty of Prosecutor

    • The prosecutor must act impartially in exploring plea bargains, ensuring that any agreement is legally permissible and just.
    • The prosecutor should be prepared to proceed to trial if no agreement is reached.

  3. Integrity of Admissions and Stipulations

    • All stipulations must be made in good faith. There is an ethical obligation to avoid frivolous or misleading stipulations or admissions.

7. PRACTICAL TIPS AND STRATEGIES

  1. Preparation is Key

    • Counsel must thoroughly review the case dossier, the complaint, witnesses’ statements, and potential defenses before the pre-trial conference.
    • Mark potential documentary exhibits in advance; prepare to object to the adversary’s evidence if necessary.

  2. Negotiation for Plea Bargaining

    • If aiming for a lesser offense or a reduced penalty, start discussing these possibilities with the prosecutor ahead of the pre-trial conference.
    • The offended party’s stance may affect the success of plea bargaining, especially in private crimes or serious offenses.

  3. Focus on Key Issues

    • Use stipulations to remove ancillary or uncontested facts from the scope of the trial. This saves time and resources for the truly disputed issues.

  4. Record Everything

    • Ensure that all agreements, admissions, or evidence markings are accurately recorded and that your copy of the Pre-Trial Order matches the court’s.
    • Immediately move to correct any misstatements in the draft pre-trial order before finalization.

  5. Client Consultation

    • Remember that it is ultimately the accused’s right whether or not to admit facts, stipulate, or plead guilty to a lesser offense. Counsel must explain thoroughly but let the accused make the final, informed choice.

8. COMMON PITFALLS

  1. Failure to Prepare Evidence

    • Not having your documentary or testimonial evidence ready can lead to inaccurate marking or missed opportunities to object to the other side’s exhibits.

  2. Coerced or Uninformed Admissions

    • An admission made without the accused’s fully informed consent can be challenged later on—but this can create undue complications and potential prejudice.

  3. Omission of Crucial Issues in Pre-Trial Order

    • If a significant defense or evidentiary objection is not explicitly included or reserved in the Pre-Trial Order, you risk being barred from raising it at trial (absent a showing of manifest injustice).

  4. Ignoring the Civil Aspect

    • Failing to address the civil liability portion (especially in cases involving property or personal injury) can prolong the litigation or lead to incomplete resolution.

9. CONCLUSION

A Pre-Trial Agreement under Rule 118 is a cornerstone of efficient criminal litigation in the Philippines. It narrows down the issues, streamlines evidence, and often provides an opportunity for plea bargaining or settlement on the civil aspect. Properly handled, pre-trial can save valuable court time and resources, while improperly handled, it can irreversibly undermine a party’s position at trial.

Key reminders for counsel:

  • Thorough preparation and client consultation are indispensable.
  • All agreements must be clear, unambiguous, and voluntary.
  • The Pre-Trial Order controls the ensuing trial; review it carefully and promptly seek corrections if needed.

Ultimately, the goal of pre-trial is to promote a fair and expeditious resolution of the criminal case—both for the accused and the prosecution—under the guiding principles of justice and due process.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Pre-trial (RULE 118) | CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

A COMPREHENSIVE DISCUSSION ON PRE-TRIAL IN CRIMINAL CASES (RULE 118, REVISED RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE)

I. OVERVIEW OF PRE-TRIAL UNDER RULE 118

Pre-trial is a mandatory stage of criminal proceedings in the Philippines. Governed by Rule 118 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, its primary purpose is to expedite the trial by clarifying and simplifying issues, exploring possible admissions or stipulations, marking and examining the authenticity of documentary evidence, considering the propriety of plea bargaining, and agreeing on other matters that could aid in the prompt disposition of the case.

The pre-trial process, when properly conducted, helps avoid unnecessary delays, ensures clarity in the presentation of evidence, and allows the court, prosecution, and defense to streamline the issues for trial. Ultimately, it serves the broader goal of efficiently dispensing justice.

II. RELEVANT LEGAL PROVISIONS

Below are the relevant sections of Rule 118:

  1. Section 1: Pre-trial; When Conducted

    • After arraignment and within thirty (30) days from the date the court acquires jurisdiction over the accused, the court shall order a pre-trial conference to consider the matters outlined in Rule 118.

  2. Section 2: Pre-trial Conference

    • This outlines what must be discussed at the pre-trial conference, including:
      1. Plea bargaining;
      2. Stipulation of facts;
      3. Marking for identification of evidence of the parties;
      4. Waiver of objections to admissibility of evidence;
      5. Modification of the order of trial if the accused admits the charge but interposes a lawful defense; and
      6. Such other matters as will promote a fair and expeditious trial.

  3. Section 3: Pre-trial Order

    • This mandates the court to issue a pre-trial order summarizing the actions taken, the facts stipulated, the admissions made, the evidence marked, and any agreements reached by the parties.
    • The pre-trial order binds the parties and controls the subsequent course of action in the case, unless modified by the court to prevent manifest injustice.

III. PURPOSES AND IMPORTANCE OF PRE-TRIAL

  1. Expedited Proceedings

    • By clarifying issues early, the court can allocate its limited time to contested matters only.
    • Avoids lengthy debates over preliminary issues during the trial itself.

  2. Identification and Simplification of Issues

    • Parties are encouraged to admit or stipulate facts that are not genuinely disputed, thereby narrowing the scope of the trial.

  3. Marking of Evidence

    • Evidence to be presented by both prosecution and defense is identified, marked, and recorded, reducing confusion or delays during the actual trial.

  4. Exploration of Plea Bargaining

    • The accused may offer to plead guilty to a lesser offense or to the offense charged under certain conditions, potentially reducing the number of issues for trial.

  5. Avoidance of Surprise

    • Through the discovery-like mechanism of pre-trial, “trial by ambush” is minimized. Each party becomes aware of the other party’s evidence and defenses.

  6. Promoting Efficiency

    • The pre-trial order formalizes agreements and stipulations reached, requiring compliance and discouraging future dilatory tactics.

IV. PROCEDURAL STEPS IN PRE-TRIAL

  1. Setting of Pre-trial Conference

    • The court, after arraignment, sets the pre-trial conference within 30 days.
    • Written notice is given to both prosecution and defense.

  2. Mandatory Appearance and Representation

    • Both the prosecution and the accused (with counsel) must appear during the pre-trial.
    • Should the counsel or accused fail to appear, the court can order sanctions, such as:
      • For the defense: The court may proceed ex parte or impose penalties for the delay.
      • For the prosecution: Possible administrative sanctions on the prosecutor, or the court may dismiss the case for lack of prosecution (subject to the requirements of due process and the state’s interest in prosecution).

  3. Filing and Exchange of Pre-trial Briefs

    • Typically, the court issues an order requiring the prosecution and defense to file their respective pre-trial briefs before the scheduled conference.
    • The pre-trial brief must include:
      • Statement of the case;
      • Facts proposed to be admitted;
      • Proposed stipulations;
      • List of documentary exhibits, with copies attached;
      • List of witnesses, with a short statement on the nature or purpose of their testimony; and
      • Other matters that may help expedite trial.

  4. Conference Proper

    • During the conference, the judge actively facilitates:
      1. Plea Bargaining – The possibility of the accused offering a plea of guilty to a lesser offense or to the offense charged with mitigating considerations.
      2. Stipulations of Fact – Both sides can agree on undisputed facts.
      3. Marking of Evidence – The prosecution and defense identify, mark, and compare evidence to ensure authenticity and admissibility.
      4. Resolution of Objections – Issues regarding admissibility or relevance of evidence are discussed; the court may receive or reserve rulings on motions to suppress or objections.
      5. Other Matters – The judge may address the order of presentation of evidence and consider procedural concerns like the number of witnesses or trial dates.

  5. Issuance of Pre-trial Order

    • After the conference, the judge is required to issue a pre-trial order, containing:
      • (a) The stipulations or admissions made by the parties;
      • (b) The issues to be tried;
      • (c) The evidence marked;
      • (d) Waivers, if any, of objections to the admissibility of evidence; and
      • (e) Other relevant matters.
    • This order controls the subsequent course of the trial, unless amended to prevent manifest injustice.

  6. Effect of the Pre-trial Order

    • The parties are bound by the stipulations, admissions, and agreements contained in the pre-trial order.
    • A party who fails to comply with the terms of the order may face sanctions.
    • Any deviation from the stipulations or evidence must be properly justified, and typically the court will disallow attempts to introduce evidence or raise issues not included in the pre-trial order unless it meets the standard of preventing a miscarriage of justice.

V. PLEA BARGAINING DURING PRE-TRIAL

  1. Definition and Nature

    • Plea bargaining in criminal cases is a process where the accused, in agreement with the prosecution and subject to court approval, may plead guilty to a lesser offense than that charged or under conditions that reduce the penalty.

  2. Timing

    • The Revised Guidelines on Continuous Trial encourage plea bargaining to be considered during pre-trial. In fact, the possibility must be mandatorily addressed by the court.

  3. Approval by the Court

    • Even if the prosecution and the accused have agreed on a plea bargain, the court must approve it.
    • The court ensures the proposed plea is consistent with law, jurisprudence, and that the rights of the accused and the interests of the state are fairly protected.

  4. Effect of a Successful Plea Bargain

    • If the accused pleads guilty to a lesser offense and the court approves, the trial proceeds only for penalty or other limited issues, or the court may directly impose the corresponding sentence for the lesser offense.

VI. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS AND JURISPRUDENTIAL GUIDELINES

  1. Mandatory Character of Pre-trial

    • Courts are required to conduct pre-trial in every criminal case after arraignment. Failure to conduct pre-trial may result in reversal of a judgment if it appears that the accused’s rights to due process or to a speedy trial are prejudiced.

  2. Role of Counsel

    • Defense counsel is expected to provide competent representation. Counsel must be prepared with a pre-trial brief, be knowledgeable about the facts, and prepared to consider admissions, stipulations, or a plea bargain.
    • Prosecutors are likewise expected to be well-prepared and authorized to enter into stipulations and plea deals when appropriate.

  3. Waiver of Objections

    • If a party fails to raise objections to the authenticity or admissibility of exhibits at the pre-trial despite having the opportunity to do so, such objections may be deemed waived.

  4. Continuance and Postponements

    • Under various Supreme Court circulars, trial courts must strictly regulate motions for postponement or continuance to avoid delays. The pre-trial conference is typically not to be postponed except for exceptionally meritorious reasons.

  5. Pre-trial in Relation to the Continuous Trial System

    • The Supreme Court’s Revised Guidelines on Continuous Trial (e.g., A.M. No. 15-06-10-SC and subsequent amendments) reinforce the mandatory nature of pre-trial and encourage strict adherence to the timelines set for marking evidence, filing motions, and listing witnesses.
    • The guidelines also emphasize the issuance of a definitive pre-trial order that precisely states the schedule for presentation of evidence and the remaining issues.

  6. Sanctions

    • Judges have the authority to impose sanctions on parties or counsel who fail to appear or who are unprepared for pre-trial without valid cause.
    • Possible sanctions include contempt, costs, or other disciplinary measures.
    • Dismissal of the case or proceeding ex parte may also be done if the absence or lack of preparation amounts to a failure to prosecute or to defend properly.

VII. LEGAL ETHICS IN PRE-TRIAL

  1. Candor and Good Faith

    • Prosecutors and defense counsels are ethically bound to conduct pre-trial negotiations and conferences in good faith.
    • Frivolous objections or unwarranted attempts to delay the proceedings violate Canon 10 and Canon 12 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, requiring lawyers to deal honestly and expedite litigation.

  2. Authority to Stipulate

    • Lawyers must ensure they have client authority to enter into stipulations, plea bargains, and other agreements. Entering stipulations without authority can lead to disciplinary action and may prejudice the client’s rights.

  3. Client Counseling

    • An attorney must fully explain to the accused the consequences of any stipulation, admission, or plea bargain. The decision to admit or stipulate ultimately belongs to the client, guided by counsel’s professional advice.

  4. Avoidance of Conflict of Interest

    • If a defense lawyer represents multiple accused or stands in a situation where representing one might prejudice another, the lawyer should disclose and secure appropriate waivers or withdraw representation if a conflict cannot be resolved.

VIII. LEGAL FORMS RELATED TO PRE-TRIAL

  1. Notice of Pre-trial

    • Standard court-issued notice informing the parties of the date, time, and place of the pre-trial conference.

  2. Pre-trial Brief (Prosecution and Defense)

    • A formal pleading containing:
      • Summary of facts;
      • Proposed stipulations and admissions;
      • List of witnesses and summary of their testimonies;
      • List of documentary and object evidence;
      • Proposed schedule for trial dates (if required);
      • Any other matters beneficial to expedite the trial.

  3. Pre-trial Order

    • A court order summarizing the agreements, admissions, stipulations, and other matters taken during the pre-trial. This is drafted under the supervision of the judge or prepared by the clerk of court under the judge’s direction.

  4. Motion to Reset or Postpone Pre-trial (if meritorious)

    • A written motion detailing the urgent reasons why the pre-trial must be moved, subject to the strict scrutiny of the court.

  5. Proposed Plea Bargaining Agreement

    • If the prosecution and defense agree to a plea bargain, they may file a joint motion or manifestation detailing the terms of the agreement, which must then be approved by the court.

IX. BEST PRACTICES FOR COUNSEL DURING PRE-TRIAL

  1. Early Preparation

    • Gather and review all evidence well before the pre-trial date.
    • Coordinate with your client regarding possible admissions, feasible defenses, and any readiness for plea bargaining.

  2. Clear Client Communication

    • Explain to the accused the significance of pre-trial, the consequences of entering stipulations, and the potential benefits of plea bargaining (if applicable).

  3. Coordination with Opposing Counsel

    • Prior to the conference, discuss potential areas for stipulation or admissions, to narrow down the issues.
    • Where ethically appropriate, share documentary evidence for earlier inspection to minimize objections later.

  4. Draft a Comprehensive Pre-trial Brief

    • Provide a thorough summary of facts, clearly list your documentary evidence (preferably pre-marked), identify your witnesses, and articulate each point that needs to be proven or disproven at trial.

  5. Maintain Professional Decorum

    • Conduct in pre-trial should be forthright and respectful of the court and the adverse party, consistent with the Code of Professional Responsibility.

  6. Securing the Pre-trial Order

    • Ensure the correctness of the pre-trial order. Check that all stipulations, admissions, and agreements have been accurately reflected.
    • Request clarifications or corrections in court if there are omissions or errors, as the pre-trial order will govern trial proceedings.

X. CONCLUSION

Pre-trial under Rule 118 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure is a vital and mandatory mechanism designed to expedite criminal proceedings, limit issues for trial, and encourage a fair resolution of cases. Adhering to the rules on pre-trial not only streamlines litigation but also upholds the rights of the accused to a speedy trial and efficient justice. Counsel must approach pre-trial with diligence, preparedness, and ethical responsibility, understanding that the agreements reached and orders issued at this stage define the roadmap for the remainder of the criminal proceeding.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login