Amnesty

Amnesty | Total Extinction | Extinction of Criminal Liability | REVISED PENAL CODE – BOOK ONE

Amnesty under Criminal Law: Total Extinction of Criminal Liability

Amnesty is a constitutional act of sovereign grace by which the State obliterates the criminal liability of individuals or classes of individuals for specific offenses. It is a mode of total extinction of criminal liability provided under the Revised Penal Code (RPC) of the Philippines.


Legal Basis

  1. Constitutional Provision:

    • Article VII, Section 19 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution empowers the President to grant amnesty with the concurrence of a majority of all members of Congress.
  2. Revised Penal Code:

    • Amnesty is categorized under Article 89 of the RPC, which lists the grounds for the total extinction of criminal liability.

Characteristics of Amnesty

  1. Public Act:

    • Unlike a pardon, which is a private act affecting an individual, amnesty is a public act of the State, typically issued through a proclamation.
  2. Retroactive Application:

    • Amnesty has a retroactive effect, effectively extinguishing the criminal liability for acts committed prior to its issuance.
  3. Political Nature:

    • Amnesty is generally granted for political offenses, such as rebellion, sedition, or treason, often as part of national reconciliation efforts.
  4. Scope and Coverage:

    • It is often granted to classes or groups of individuals (e.g., insurgents) rather than to specific individuals.
  5. Requires Congressional Concurrence:

    • The President cannot unilaterally grant amnesty; it requires the approval of a majority of all members of Congress.

Process of Granting Amnesty

  1. Presidential Proclamation:

    • The President issues a proclamation specifying the terms, conditions, and scope of the amnesty.
  2. Congressional Concurrence:

    • A majority of all members of Congress must approve the proclamation.
  3. Application for Amnesty:

    • Persons covered by the proclamation must file a formal application for amnesty before the designated authority or committee within the specified period.
  4. Determination of Qualification:

    • A designated body, such as the Amnesty Commission, reviews applications to determine whether the applicant qualifies under the terms of the proclamation.
  5. Effect of Grant:

    • Upon approval of the application, the criminal liability for the specified offense is extinguished.

Distinction Between Amnesty and Pardon

Feature Amnesty Pardon
Nature Public act; addresses groups or classes. Private act; addresses individuals.
Concurrence Requires Congressional concurrence. Solely the President's prerogative.
Effect Extinguishes both criminal liability and penalties. Extinguishes penalties but not criminal liability.
Application Retroactive. Prospective.
Scope Generally for political offenses. Covers all types of offenses.

Effects of Amnesty

  1. Total Extinction of Criminal Liability:

    • Both the criminal liability and its associated penalties are extinguished.
  2. Restoration of Civil Rights:

    • Civil rights and political privileges that may have been forfeited due to conviction are restored.
  3. Non-Inclusion in Criminal Records:

    • Acts covered by amnesty are obliterated from the criminal records of the grantee.

Limitations of Amnesty

  1. Scope Defined by Proclamation:

    • Amnesty only covers offenses explicitly enumerated in the proclamation.
  2. No Application to Civil Liability:

    • While criminal liability is extinguished, civil liability (e.g., for damages) remains unless explicitly stated in the proclamation.
  3. No Automatic Coverage:

    • Individuals must apply for amnesty within the prescribed period and comply with the conditions.

Relevant Jurisprudence

  1. People v. Vera (65 Phil. 56):

    • Defined amnesty as an act of oblivion or forgetfulness of past acts, granted by the government for political offenses.
  2. Barrioquinto v. Fernandez (82 Phil. 642):

    • Distinguished between pardon and amnesty, emphasizing that amnesty obliterates the offense itself.
  3. Monsanto v. Factoran (G.R. No. 78239, 1989):

    • Held that while amnesty removes the criminal liability, it does not automatically erase civil liability unless explicitly stated.

Practical Applications

Amnesty is often granted in the context of:

  • Peace negotiations with rebel groups (e.g., NPA, MNLF, MILF).
  • Post-conflict reconciliation and reintegration.
  • Transitional justice in the aftermath of political upheavals.

Conclusion

Amnesty is a powerful tool for the State to promote reconciliation, peace, and national unity. Its retroactive effect and broad coverage make it a distinct mechanism for extinguishing criminal liability, subject to clear procedural and constitutional safeguards.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.