Kinds of Actions

Actions in rem, in personam and quasi in rem | Kinds of Actions | CIVIL PROCEDURE

Below is a detailed discussion of the distinctions and key principles governing actions in rem, in personam, and quasi in rem in Philippine civil procedure. While the laws cited generally refer to the Revised Rules of Court (and interpretations by Philippine jurisprudence), the discussion strives to provide a comprehensive and meticulous overview.

I. INTRODUCTION

Under Philippine remedial law, the nature of an action—whether in rem, in personam, or quasi in rem—bears upon fundamental questions of jurisdiction, service of summons, and the binding effect of judgments. Understanding these distinctions is critical to ensuring proper procedures are followed and judgments are enforced lawfully.

  • Action in rem: Directed against the thing (res) itself, to bar indifferently all who might have an interest in that property or status.
  • Action in personam: Directed against a specific person to enforce a personal obligation.
  • Action quasi in rem: Directed against a specific person but dealing with specific property or status of that person, such that judgments affect only the specific parties’ interest in the property.

II. ACTION IN REM

  1. Definition and Nature
    An action in rem is an action directed against the “res,” or the property or status involved, rather than a specific defendant in his personal capacity. A classic example is a petition for annulment of marriage or declaration of nullity of marriage or a proceeding to register or foreclose property under the Torrens system.

  2. Examples of Actions in Rem

    • Land registration proceedings (e.g., Land Registration Act and Presidential Decree No. 1529)
    • Foreclosure proceedings in rem (e.g., extrajudicial foreclosure of real estate mortgage under Act No. 3135, as amended)
    • Probate or settlement of estate proceedings
    • Annulment or declaration of nullity of marriage (in some jurisdictions, these are sometimes considered actions in rem or quasi in rem, but traditionally treated as in rem since the status of marriage affects the world at large.)

  3. Jurisdiction and Service of Summons

    • Jurisdiction over the res: The court acquires jurisdiction over the property or status in question once the action is instituted and all relevant procedural requirements for notice or publication are complied with.
    • Service of summons is typically by publication or any means required by the Rules of Court or by specific statutes that ensure notice to all interested parties.
    • Even if actual defendants do not appear, as long as notice by publication and other required notices (e.g., posting) have been made, the court’s judgment binds the entire world (i.e., all parties, known and unknown, who may claim an interest).

  4. Effect of Judgment

    • A judgment in rem is binding upon the entire world with respect to the subject matter of the action.
    • For example, once a court decrees land registration in favor of a certain claimant in an action in rem, the Torrens title is conclusive against all other adverse claims, except in specific cases allowed by law (e.g., fraud).

III. ACTION IN PERSONAM

  1. Definition and Nature
    An action in personam is an action directed against a specific individual to enforce a personal duty or obligation. The subject matter of the litigation may involve a property dispute, a contract, or a tort, but what makes it in personam is that the plaintiff seeks a personal judgment against the defendant (e.g., for payment of money or specific performance).

  2. Examples of Actions in Personam

    • Breach of contract
    • Specific performance suits
    • Recovery of damages in tort or quasi-delict
    • Collection suits (debt collection, sum of money)

  3. Jurisdiction and Service of Summons

    • Jurisdiction over the person: The court acquires jurisdiction over the defendant only after valid service of summons within the territory (or by extraterritorial service in specific instances allowed by the Rules of Court).
    • Rule 14 of the Revised Rules of Court prescribes various modes of service: personal service, substituted service, and, in limited cases, extraterritorial service (but only when the action falls under certain categories and if the defendant is outside the Philippines).
    • In an action in personam, if no valid service of summons is effected, the court cannot render a judgment binding on the defendant (except that the court may dismiss the action or apply other procedural remedies).

  4. Effect of Judgment

    • A judgment in personam is binding only upon the parties properly served and who are within the court’s jurisdiction.
    • It does not bind third persons, nor does it affect property beyond the parties’ interest.
    • For instance, if a plaintiff sues Defendant A for a loan, the judgment for the sum of money is enforceable solely against Defendant A (unless an exception applies).

IV. ACTION QUASI IN REM

  1. Definition and Nature
    An action quasi in rem is filed against a specific person but with respect to a particular property of that person or with respect to a status that affects that person. While the primary aim is not to impose a personal liability (although the action is against a person), the proceeding’s main objective is to subject specific property or interests to the court’s jurisdiction for partial or limited purposes.

  2. Examples of Actions Quasi in Rem

    • Attachment or garnishment proceeding involving a debtor’s property
    • Partition suits or suits for adjudication of ownership over a particular property as between the parties
    • Actions for mortgage foreclosure where the objective is to apply the property to satisfy a claim, but the resulting judgment typically affects only that property and not the personal liability of the owner (though in some cases, deficiency judgments can still be in personam).

  3. Jurisdiction and Service of Summons

    • The court must acquire jurisdiction over the property by some form of attachment, publication, or notice to the party, depending on the Rules of Court.
    • Service of summons in a quasi in rem action may also be accomplished by publication, provided that the defendant is outside the jurisdiction and the subject matter is the property.
    • Even if the defendant is not personally served, if the property is validly placed under the court’s control (through attachment, garnishment, or statutory notice), the court acquires jurisdiction to dispose of or adjudicate that property.

  4. Effect of Judgment

    • The judgment in an action quasi in rem is conclusive only between the parties over their interest or rights in the specific property.
    • It does not create a personal liability beyond the attached or identified property (unless a deficiency judgment is sought and valid personal service is accomplished in certain suits, such as mortgage foreclosure).

V. DISTINGUISHING FACTORS

  1. Nature of the Res or Claim

    • In Rem: The “res” or status itself is the main subject.
    • In Personam: The claim is for personal liability against a defendant.
    • Quasi in Rem: A specific person is named, but the relief is limited to a particular property or interest.

  2. Service of Summons and Notice Requirements

    • In Rem: Typically by publication and posting to notify all possible claimants.
    • In Personam: Personal or substituted service within the forum, unless extraterritorial service is specifically authorized by the Rules.
    • Quasi in Rem: May involve publication or attachment of the property and notice to interested persons, but personal service on the defendant is not strictly required if the property is brought under the court’s control.

  3. Binding Effect of Judgment

    • In Rem: Binding upon the whole world (erga omnes).
    • In Personam: Binding only on the parties and their privies.
    • Quasi in Rem: Binding only on the parties in relation to their interest in the property, without imposing personal liability unless proper summons for personal liability is made.

VI. RELEVANT PHILIPPINE RULES AND JURISPRUDENCE

  1. Rules of Court

    • Rule 2 (Ordinary Civil Actions) provides the general framework for actions in personam and references to in rem/quasi in rem.
    • Rule 14 (Summons) elaborates on service of summons and distinguishes situations in which extraterritorial service or service by publication is permitted.

  2. Leading Jurisprudence

    • Biaco v. Philippine Countryside Rural Bank, G.R. No. 161417 (2008): Clarified that an action quasi in rem deals with property seized to satisfy a claim; the resulting judgment is enforceable only against that property.
    • Domagas v. Jensen, G.R. No. 161043 (2006): Differentiated in personam from in rem actions, emphasizing the necessity of valid service of summons to acquire jurisdiction over the defendant’s person in in personam cases.
    • De Pedro v. Romasan Development Corp., G.R. No. 191218 (2016): Reiterated the rules on extraterritorial service and the nature of quasi in rem actions.

  3. Practical Considerations

    • In actions in personam, the plaintiff must ensure valid service of summons on the defendant. If the defendant is abroad, the conditions for extraterritorial service (Rule 14, Section 15) must be strictly met.
    • In actions in rem or quasi in rem, compliance with publication and posting or attachment requirements is mandatory to clothe the court with jurisdiction over the res or property.
    • Lawyers must carefully plead the nature of the action and follow the correct mode of summons or notice to avoid dismissals for lack of jurisdiction.

VII. APPLICATION AND STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE

  1. Pleading Strategy

    • The plaintiff must clearly state in the complaint whether the action is in personam, in rem, or quasi in rem, because this dictates how jurisdiction is acquired and the method of serving summons.
    • Misclassification can lead to a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

  2. Remedies and Enforcement

    • In in personam judgments, the winning party can enforce the judgment against the defendant’s entire estate or properties (wherever located in the Philippines), provided they can locate and levy those properties and the defendant was personally bound by the court’s jurisdiction.
    • In in rem or quasi in rem judgments, enforcement is generally limited to the res or property involved in the action.
    • When property is attached in a quasi in rem action, the sheriff or process server must follow the rules in Rule 57 (Preliminary Attachment) or relevant provisions to perfect the court’s jurisdiction over that property.

  3. Defenses and Motion Practice

    • Defendants in in personam actions can raise the lack of jurisdiction over the person if service of summons was improper.
    • In in rem or quasi in rem actions, defendants can question the court’s jurisdiction over the res if the statutory requirements on publication, posting, or attachment were not strictly followed.
    • Collateral attack on judgments in rem is generally not allowed if the court had jurisdiction and followed due process in giving notice.

VIII. SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS

  1. Actions in Rem:

    • Court jurisdiction attaches by control over the res (property/status).
    • Service often by publication, aiming at all claimants.
    • Judgment is erga omnes (against the world).

  2. Actions in Personam:

    • Court needs personal jurisdiction over the defendant.
    • Requires valid service of summons on the individual.
    • Judgment is binding only on the parties.

  3. Actions Quasi in Rem:

    • Filed against a person, but the action focuses on specific property or status.
    • Jurisdiction acquired over the property (attachment, notice, etc.).
    • Judgment affects only the parties’ interest in that property.

  4. Practical Considerations:

    • Proper classification determines how summons/notice must be served.
    • Non-compliance with jurisdictional requirements results in nullity of judgment.
    • The nature of the action controls how and whom the judgment binds.

IX. CONCLUSION

A firm grasp of the distinctions among actions in rem, in personam, and quasi in rem is essential for any litigator or judge in the Philippines. The mode of service of summons, the scope of the court’s jurisdiction, and the effect of judgments drastically differ among these actions. Failure to properly classify and comply with jurisdictional rules can lead to dismissals and unenforceable judgments.

When drafting pleadings, lawyers must carefully determine the essence of the client’s cause of action and the desired relief. They must also observe the correct procedure for service of summons, whether personal, substituted, or by publication, ensuring the court’s jurisdiction is validly invoked. Mastery of these principles safeguards litigants’ rights, promotes judicial efficiency, and upholds the integrity of judicial proceedings in the Philippines.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Personal actions and real actions | Kinds of Actions | CIVIL PROCEDURE

Below is a comprehensive discussion of personal actions and real actions under Philippine law, particularly within the context of civil procedure. This outline is based on the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure (as amended), pertinent jurisprudence, and related legal principles.

I. OVERVIEW

In Philippine procedural law, actions are generally classified into two broad categories: real actions and personal actions. This classification is crucial for determining the proper venue, the nature of the relief sought, and certain procedural requirements. Although the basic definition of these actions stems from centuries-old civil law tradition, the controlling framework today is found primarily in the Rules of Court, specifically Rule 4 on Venue of Actions, supplemented by Supreme Court decisions interpreting these rules.

II. LEGAL BASIS AND DEFINITIONS

A. Statutory and Rule-Based Foundation

  1. Rule 4, Section 1 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure:

    • Real Actions: Those that affect title to or possession of real property, or interest therein.
    • Personal Actions: Those founded on privity of contract, damages for injuries to persons or property, and other rights or claims not involving real property.

  2. Civil Code of the Philippines: Though not explicitly categorizing real vs. personal actions in procedural terms, various provisions on property rights and obligations (Book II on Property, Ownership, and its Modifications; Book IV on Obligations and Contracts) inform when an action may be deemed real (affecting immovable property) or personal (affecting personal rights or obligations or movable property).

B. Key Distinction

  • A real action principally involves a real property right (ownership, possession, interest, foreclosure of real estate mortgage, partition, or any other suit where real property is the subject).
  • A personal action seeks enforcement of a personal obligation or liability, or recovery of personal property, or damages not directly tied to real property.

III. REAL ACTIONS

A. Definition and Nature

A real action is an action where the claim asserted involves title to, ownership, possession, or any interest in real property. The realty itself (or an interest therein) is the “object” of the litigation. Consequently, the judgment in a real action operates upon the thing or property itself and is binding against the whole world (or erga omnes).

  1. Examples:

    • Accion reivindicatoria: An action for the recovery of ownership of real property.
    • Accion publiciana: An action for the recovery of possession of real property when the dispossession has lasted for more than one year.
    • Accion interdictal or forcible entry / unlawful detainer (though these are summary in nature, they are still considered real actions involving possession).
    • Foreclosure of real estate mortgage: The action primarily involves the real property subject of the mortgage.
    • Partition suits: Where the property is sought to be physically or legally divided among co-owners.

  2. Venue:

    • Under Rule 4, Section 1, real actions “shall be commenced and tried in the proper court which has jurisdiction over the area where the real property or any part thereof is situated.”
    • This mandatory rule on venue is jurisdictional in real actions concerning immovable property.

  3. Effect on the Property:

    • In real actions, the court’s judgment often results in a directive affecting the status or ownership of specific real property (e.g., awarding ownership, ordering a partition, restoring possession).
    • Such judgment can be recorded on the title to provide notice to third persons (e.g., annotation on the Transfer Certificate of Title).

  4. Interest in Real Property:

    • The interest must be substantial or direct. Merely incidental issues (e.g., reference to land in determining damages or boundary, but no direct question of title or possession) do not automatically make the action real.

IV. PERSONAL ACTIONS

A. Definition and Nature

A personal action is one that does not directly involve or affect real property in terms of title or possession. Instead, it primarily seeks to enforce a personal obligation, recover money or damages, or compel the performance or omission of an act. The property in question, if any, is usually movable (personal property), or the action is purely for breach of contract, tort, or damages.

  1. Examples:

    • Actions for sum of money (collection suits, debts, unpaid loans, or obligations to pay).
    • Actions for damages (arising from contract or tortious conduct) that do not involve claims to real property.
    • Specific performance based on a contract where the subject matter is not real property (or does not directly affect title to land).
    • Rescission of contract (e.g., for the sale of personal property).
    • Quasi-delict claims under Article 2176 of the Civil Code, where the primary relief sought is indemnity or damages in personam.

  2. Venue:

    • Under Rule 4, Section 2, personal actions “may be commenced and tried where the plaintiff or any of the principal plaintiffs resides or where the defendant or any of the principal defendants resides, or in the case of a non-resident defendant, where the plaintiff resides, at the election of the plaintiff.”
    • This general rule is subject to stipulations as to venue in contracts (if not contrary to law, public policy, etc.) and is not jurisdictional unless specifically made so by law.

  3. In Personam vs. In Rem:

    • Most personal actions are in personam, directed against a particular person for the satisfaction of a personal claim or obligation.
    • This characteristic contrasts with in rem actions (many real actions are in rem or quasi in rem), which directly affect property and are binding upon the whole world.

  4. Relief Sought:

    • The main relief in personal actions is usually money damages, performance, or some personal liability.
    • The enforcement of judgment is typically against the person or personal/real property of the judgment debtor in a general sense (by levy, garnishment), rather than operating upon a specific real property as in real actions.

V. COMMON MISUNDERSTANDINGS AND CLARIFICATIONS

  1. When Real Property is Incidental:

    • Not every lawsuit mentioning land or buildings is necessarily a real action. For instance, an action for damages where real property damage is merely the result of a wrongful act, but the ownership or possession of the land is not in dispute, generally remains a personal action.

  2. Mixed Elements:

    • Some complaints may contain both real and personal claims (e.g., an action for partition that also seeks damages for the fruits or rentals). The dominant claim usually determines the classification. However, when in doubt, the safer approach is to treat it as a real action and file in the court of the situs of the property.

  3. Action to Nullify Deed over Land:

    • An action for declaration of nullity of a deed involving real property is typically a real action, since it directly affects title or an interest in the property.

  4. Partition of Estate:

    • A partition of an estate that includes real property is considered a real action with respect to the real property portion.

  5. Injunction or Prohibition:

    • Whether an injunction action is real or personal depends on the subject matter to be enjoined. If it involves preventing a person from encroaching on or further occupying land (affecting possession), it can be a real action; if it is simply enjoining a personal act (e.g., stopping publication of defamatory material), it is personal.

VI. PROCEDURAL EFFECTS AND STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS

  1. Venue Determination:

    • Correctly characterizing the action as real or personal is critical to avoid improper venue.
    • An incorrectly filed case may be subject to dismissal on the ground of improper venue.

  2. Jurisdictional Aspects:

    • For real actions involving real property where the assessed value or claims are above a certain threshold, the case must be filed in the proper court (generally the Regional Trial Court if the value is above what the Municipal Trial Courts can handle).
    • For personal actions, the determining factor is the amount of damages or claim; if it exceeds the jurisdictional amount of the first-level courts, it must be filed in the RTC.

  3. Annotations on Title (Real Actions):

    • In an action directly involving real property, a litigant may annotate a lis pendens on the Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) or Original Certificate of Title (OCT) to give notice to third parties. This step is not applicable to purely personal actions.

  4. Provisional Remedies:

    • Provisional remedies (e.g., preliminary attachment, preliminary injunction, receivership, replevin) may be availed of in either real or personal actions, but the conditions differ. For instance:
      • Replevin is specific to personal property.
      • Attachment can apply to both personal and real actions but is typically employed in personal actions (collection of sums of money).

  5. Prescription:

    • The classification may also impact prescriptive periods (e.g., actions on real contracts vs. personal contracts, or actions to recover real property vs. purely personal suits).

VII. RELEVANT SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

  1. Heirs of Valeriano Concha, Sr. v. Spouses Lumocso (G.R. No. 177681, September 7, 2011)

    • Reiterated that an action involving ownership and recovery of possession of land is a real action and thus must be filed where the property is located.

  2. Sarmiento v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 126153, June 8, 2000)

    • Distinguished between an action for recovery of possession (real action) and an action for damages for trespass (personal action).

  3. Estate of Juliana Fernando v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 120802, April 12, 2000)

    • Clarified that a complaint primarily for damages where real property is merely incidental to the claim remains a personal action.

  4. Aldovino v. Alunan III (G.R. No. 182677, December 4, 2009)

    • Although focusing on other legal issues, the Court emphasized the importance of venue rules and the distinction between in rem/quasi in rem (often real actions) and in personam (personal actions).

VIII. SAMPLE LEGAL FORMS (OVERVIEW)

Although the exact formats of pleadings may vary depending on practice, below are general headings/forms illustrating distinctions in how complaints might be captioned and where they must be filed:

  1. Complaint for Sum of Money (Personal Action)

    • Title: “Complaint for Collection of Sum of Money”
    • Allegation focuses on the defendant’s obligation to pay money.
    • Venue: Where plaintiff or defendant resides, at plaintiff’s option.

  2. Complaint for Recovery of Ownership (Accion reivindicatoria) (Real Action)

    • Title: “Complaint for Recovery of Ownership (Accion reivindicatoria) involving Real Property”
    • Venue: RTC of the province/city/municipality where the property is located.
    • Relief: Declaration of ownership, issuance of new title, damages (if any).

  3. Complaint for Partition (Real Action)

    • Title: “Complaint for Partition of Real Property”
    • Must be filed in the place where the property is located.
    • Relief: Physical or legal partition, accounting of fruits, etc.

  4. Complaint for Breach of Contract of Sale of Personal Property (Personal Action)

    • Title: “Complaint for Specific Performance and Damages”
    • Venue: Plaintiff’s or defendant’s residence.
    • Relief: Payment of money or performance, not affecting real property title.

  5. Complaint for Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage (Real Action)

    • Title: “Complaint for Judicial Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage”
    • Venue: Location of the real property mortgaged.
    • Relief: Sale of property to satisfy the debt, deficiency judgment.

IX. CONCLUSION

The distinction between personal actions and real actions is foundational in Philippine civil procedure. It affects:

  • Venue (where the case must be filed);
  • Jurisdiction (which court will hear the case based on nature and amount);
  • Relief and nature of judgment (in rem vs. in personam);
  • Procedural strategies (e.g., whether to annotate a lis pendens, the possibility of replevin, etc.).

To properly file and prosecute a case, the material allegations of the complaint must be carefully evaluated to determine whether the dispute revolves around title to or possession of real property or simply enforces a personal right or obligation. This classification, though seemingly simple in principle, can become complex in fact-specific scenarios; hence, meticulous legal analysis and drafting are essential to avoid fatal procedural missteps.

Disclaimer: This discussion is intended for general informational and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice. For specific concerns and fact patterns, always consult with a qualified Philippine attorney or seek guidance from the appropriate judicial and administrative bodies.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Kinds of Actions | CIVIL PROCEDURE

DISCLAIMER: The following discussion is for general educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice. For specific concerns, you should consult a qualified Philippine attorney who can address your unique circumstances.

KINDS OF ACTIONS UNDER PHILIPPINE CIVIL PROCEDURE

Under Philippine law, particularly the Rules of Court (as amended) and relevant jurisprudence, civil actions are classified in several ways, depending on the nature and the subject matter of the suit, as well as the remedy sought. Below is a comprehensive overview:

I. ORDINARY CIVIL ACTIONS VS. SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS

A. Ordinary Civil Actions

An ordinary civil action is one governed generally by the provisions of Rules 1 to 71 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended. It involves disputes where one party seeks to enforce or protect a right or to prevent or redress a wrong. Typical examples include:

  1. Actions for Collection of Sum of Money
  2. Breach of Contract
  3. Damages

Key Characteristics:

  • Follows the standard rules on pleading, pre-trial, trial, and judgment.
  • Remedial measures include the standard course of litigation: complaint, answer, possible counterclaims, cross-claims, etc.

B. Special Civil Actions

A special civil action is also a civil action but is governed by a specific rule or set of rules due to its peculiar nature. Special Civil Actions are enumerated in the Rules of Court (Rules 62 to 71) and include:

  1. Interpleader (Rule 62)
  2. Declaratory Relief and Similar Remedies (Rule 63)
  3. Review of Judgments and Final Orders or Resolutions of the Commission on Elections and the Commission on Audit (Rule 64)
  4. Certiorari, Prohibition, and Mandamus (Rule 65)
  5. Quo Warranto (Rule 66)
  6. Expropriation (Rule 67)
  7. Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage (Rule 68)
  8. Partition (Rule 69)
  9. Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer (Rule 70)
  10. Contempt (Rule 71)

Key Characteristics:

  • Each special civil action has distinct jurisdictional and procedural rules.
  • Some require specific allegations or special modes of service.
  • Some (e.g., certiorari, prohibition, mandamus) are also considered extraordinary remedies because they are not initiated as typical adversarial civil suits but rather as measures to address specific governmental or judicial actions.

II. REAL ACTIONS VS. PERSONAL ACTIONS

A. Real Actions

A real action is one that primarily affects title to or possession of real property, or an interest therein. The object of the action is a specific immovable property.

Examples:

  • Action for recovery of ownership (accion reivindicatoria)
  • Action for quieting of title
  • Action to recover possession (accion publiciana, accion reivindicatoria, or accion de despojo under various contexts)
  • Action for partition of real property

Venue:

  • A real action must be filed in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) or the first-level court (depending on the assessed value of the property) of the province or city where the real property (or a portion thereof) is situated, pursuant to the rules on venue (Rule 4, Rules of Court).

B. Personal Actions

A personal action is one that is not a real action. It involves the recovery of personal property, enforcement of a personal right, or recovery of damages for the violation of a contract or other actionable wrong.

Examples:

  • Action for sum of money
  • Action for damages (e.g., from quasi-delict)
  • Action for enforcement of contractual obligations

Venue:

  • A personal action is generally commenced where the plaintiff or any of the principal plaintiffs resides, or where the defendant or any of the principal defendants resides, at the election of the plaintiff (if the defendant is a resident of the Philippines).

Practical Effect:

  • Classification between real and personal actions determines where the action must be filed and how the court acquires jurisdiction over the subject matter.

III. ACTIONS IN PERSONAM, IN REM, AND QUASI IN REM

This classification focuses on how the court acquires jurisdiction and against whom or what the judgment is binding:

  1. Action In Personam

    • Directed against a particular person to impose a personal liability or obligation.
    • The judgment binds only the parties to the action.
    • The court must acquire jurisdiction over the person of the defendant (usually by valid service of summons within the Philippines or by voluntary appearance).

  2. Action In Rem

    • Directed against the “thing” or property itself.
    • The main object is to affect the person’s interest in a specific property.
    • The judgment is binding against the whole world with respect to the res (thing or status) in question.
    • Example: Probate of wills, registration of land under the Torrens system, petitions for annulment of a marriage (status), forfeiture proceedings.
    • Jurisdiction is acquired by publication, posting, and other modes of notice directed to all claimants of the property.

  3. Action Quasi in Rem

    • Brought against specific persons, but the purpose is to subject their interests in a specific property to the obligation or lien burdening it.
    • Example: Action for partition, foreclosure of mortgage.
    • While directed primarily against a specific person, the outcome affects only the property subject of the action.
    • The judgment is enforceable against the res (property), not necessarily imposing a personal liability beyond the property.

Practical Significance:

  • Service of Summons: In in personam actions, personal or substituted service within the Philippines (or voluntary appearance) is typically necessary for the court to acquire jurisdiction over the defendant. In in rem or quasi in rem actions, constructive service (like publication) may suffice, as the action is primarily directed against the property or status.

IV. IMPORTANCE OF CLASSIFICATION

  1. Jurisdiction:

    • Different courts have jurisdiction over different types of actions. For instance, Municipal Trial Courts (MTCs) have exclusive original jurisdiction over certain actions involving real property where the assessed value does not exceed a certain threshold. Regional Trial Courts (RTCs) have original jurisdiction when the property’s assessed value or the subject matter’s amount in controversy exceeds that threshold.
    • Special Civil Actions may also be subject to original or appellate jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals or even the Supreme Court (e.g., Rule 65 petitions questioning decisions of lower courts or quasi-judicial agencies).

  2. Venue:

    • As discussed, real actions must be filed where the property is located; personal actions are filed where either the plaintiff or defendant resides (plaintiff’s choice), if the defendant is a resident.
    • Improper venue can lead to dismissal if challenged in a timely manner.

  3. Nature of Relief:

    • The classification affects the kinds of remedies (whether personal liability or recovery of specific property or interest in property) a plaintiff can seek.

  4. Procedural Requirements:

    • Each classification can entail different procedures for summons, pleadings, evidence, and execution of judgments.

V. LEGAL ETHICS CONSIDERATIONS

  1. Candor and Fairness to the Court:

    • Lawyers must properly classify the action being filed. Misrepresenting an action’s nature (e.g., disguising a real action as a personal action to manipulate venue) violates ethical obligations and can subject counsel to disciplinary sanctions.

  2. Avoiding Forum Shopping:

    • Filing multiple actions based on the same cause of action or seeking the same relief in different courts is prohibited. Proper classification helps identify whether a cause of action has already been litigated or is pending elsewhere.

  3. Diligence and Competence:

    • Counsel must exercise reasonable care in determining the correct action to file and ensuring compliance with procedural rules.

  4. Client Counseling:

    • Lawyers should advise clients on the implications of filing a particular type of action—especially regarding venue, costs, and the potential for adverse judgments or dismissals on procedural grounds.

VI. SAMPLE LEGAL FORMS (ILLUSTRATIVE)

Below are simplified outlines showing how different types of actions may be initiated. (For actual practice, consult the latest templates and rules; these are purely examples.)

  1. Ordinary Civil Action (Sum of Money) 

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
[Branch], [City/Province]

[Name of Plaintiff],
      Plaintiff,
-versus-                                    Civil Case No. ___________
[Name of Defendant],
      Defendant.
x-----------------------------------------x

                             COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, by counsel, respectfully alleges:

1. Plaintiff is of legal age, residing at ______________________;
2. Defendant is of legal age, residing at ______________________;
3. On [Date], Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a contract whereby ...
4. Defendant failed to pay the amount of Php __________ despite repeated demands...

WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintiff prays for judgment ordering Defendant to pay:

1. The sum of Php _________ with legal interest;
2. Attorney’s fees of Php _________;
3. Costs of suit; and
4. Other just and equitable reliefs.

[Date and Place]

[Signature of Counsel]
[Counsel’s Name and Roll Number]
[Address]
[IBP No., PTR No., MCLE Compliance No.]

  2. Real Action (Recovery of Possession) 

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
[Branch], [City/Province where the property is located]

[Name of Plaintiff],
      Plaintiff,
-versus-                                    Civil Case No. ___________
[Name of Defendant],
      Defendant.
x-----------------------------------------x

                           COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, by counsel, respectfully alleges:

1. Plaintiff is of legal age, residing at ______________________;
2. Defendant is of legal age, residing at ______________________;
3. Plaintiff is the registered owner of a parcel of land located at ______________ with TCT No. ______;
4. Defendant, without any legal right or authority, entered and occupied said property and refuses to vacate despite demands...

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that judgment be rendered:

1. Ordering Defendant to vacate the subject property;
2. Restoring possession thereof to Plaintiff;
3. Ordering Defendant to pay damages and costs of suit;
4. Granting such other relief as may be just and equitable.

[Date and Place]

[Signature of Counsel]
[Counsel’s Name and Roll Number]
[Address]
[IBP No., PTR No., MCLE Compliance No.]

  3. Special Civil Action (Certiorari under Rule 65) 

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
COURT OF APPEALS (or SUPREME COURT, depending on the case)
[City]

[Name of Petitioner],
      Petitioner,
-versus-                                    CA-G.R. SP No. ___________
[Name of Respondent, e.g.,
 Judge of the RTC Branch ___, Province of ___ and [Adverse Party]],
      Respondents.
x-----------------------------------------x

                            PETITION FOR CERTIORARI

Petitioner, by counsel, respectfully states:

1. Petitioner is of legal age, residing at ______________________;
2. Public Respondent is a Presiding Judge of RTC Branch ____ who issued an Order dated ____ which was rendered with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction;
3. Private Respondent is the adverse party who stands to be benefited or injured by the outcome of this petition.

Statement of Facts:
(Set forth material dates and relevant facts to show timeliness and cause of action.)

Grounds:
(Set forth why the respondent acted with grave abuse of discretion.)

Relief:
WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays that the questioned Order be annulled and set aside, and a temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction be issued to enjoin its enforcement, and such other relief as may be just and equitable.

[Date and Place]

[Signature of Counsel]
[Counsel’s Name and Roll Number]
[Address]
[IBP No., PTR No., MCLE Compliance No.]

VII. SUMMARY

  1. Ordinary vs. Special Civil Actions: Special civil actions have unique rules and remedies.
  2. Real vs. Personal Actions: Real actions affect title or possession of real property; personal actions seek personal liability or movable property.
  3. In Personam, In Rem, Quasi in Rem: Distinguishes how the court acquires jurisdiction (over the person, or over the property/status).
  4. Venue and Jurisdiction: Classification dictates which court has authority and where the case must be filed.
  5. Ethical Considerations: Proper classification ensures compliance with professional obligations, prevents forum shopping, and avoids sanctions.

Overall, knowing the kinds of actions is crucial for any litigator in the Philippines because it determines where, how, and under what rules a case proceeds. It also guides the remedies and defenses available, the manner of service of summons, and the enforceability of judgments. Mastery of these principles is foundational to effective advocacy and upholding legal ethics in practice.

END OF DISCUSSION

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Lawyer Login

 
 
Privacy Policy         Terms of Use         Lawyer Login