Spontaneous Desistance | Stages of Execution | Felonies | REVISED PENAL CODE – BOOK ONE

Spontaneous Desistance in Criminal Law

Under the Revised Penal Code (RPC) of the Philippines, the concept of spontaneous desistance pertains to the doctrine that addresses the liability of an offender when they voluntarily stop or desist from completing a criminal act. This principle plays a significant role in determining whether criminal liability attaches at certain stages of execution.

---

Stages of Execution

In criminal law, felonies are classified into consummated, frustrated, and attempted stages, depending on the degree of execution. These stages define whether an act is punishable and to what extent.

1. Consummated Stage: The felony is completed, and all the elements necessary for its execution and accomplishment are present.

2. Frustrated Stage: The offender performs all acts of execution that would result in the commission of the felony, but it is not consummated due to causes independent of the offender's will.

3. Attempted Stage: The offender begins to commit a felony by overt acts but does not perform all the acts of execution due to reasons other than the offender's spontaneous desistance.

---

Definition of Spontaneous Desistance

Spontaneous desistance refers to the voluntary and deliberate abandonment of the criminal purpose by the offender after beginning the commission of a felony but before all the acts of execution are performed. When spontaneous desistance occurs, the offender is not criminally liable for the attempted felony because the act has not yet reached the stage where it constitutes a punishable offense under the law.

---

Key Characteristics of Spontaneous Desistance

1. Voluntariness:

   • The desistance must be purely voluntary and not due to external causes or forces. For instance, if the offender stops because of fear of being caught or due to intervention by another person, it is not spontaneous.

2. Timeliness:

   • The desistance must occur before the completion of all acts of execution. If all acts necessary to commit the felony have already been performed, desistance will not absolve the offender of liability.

3. Absence of External Factors:

   • The decision to abandon the criminal purpose must be entirely the result of the offender’s own volition, without coercion or any external compulsion.

---

Legal Effect of Spontaneous Desistance

When an offender desists spontaneously:

1. No Criminal Liability for Attempt:

   • Since the act has not reached the point of an attempted felony, the offender is not liable under the law.
   • The rationale is that the legal system aims to encourage desistance to prevent the commission of crimes.

2. Exceptions:

   • If preparatory acts already constitute an independent crime, the offender may still be liable for such an offense. For example:
     • Acts of conspiracy or proposal to commit a felony, when expressly penalized (e.g., Article 115 on conspiracy to commit treason), remain punishable.
     • Possession of illegal firearms or other preparatory acts that are separately criminalized will not be absolved by desistance.

---

Application in Specific Crimes

The doctrine of spontaneous desistance is most relevant to intentional felonies and crimes requiring a specific criminal intent (dolus). It does not apply to:

1. Crimes of Negligence or Recklessness:
   • Since these offenses do not involve intent, desistance is irrelevant.
2. Crimes with General Criminal Intent:
   • In certain crimes like homicide, once acts of execution commence, desistance is no longer relevant to liability.

---

Jurisprudence on Spontaneous Desistance

The Supreme Court of the Philippines has consistently emphasized the principle of spontaneous desistance as a safeguard to ensure that individuals are not unduly punished for mere intentions. Key rulings have clarified the boundaries:

1. People v. Lizada (G.R. No. L-46528):

   • This case emphasized that desistance must occur prior to the completion of acts leading to the attempted stage. It also underscored voluntariness as an essential element.

2. People v. Lamahang (G.R. No. L-28133):

   • The Court held that a voluntary act of abandonment negates liability at the attempted stage but reiterated that preparatory acts punishable as separate crimes are unaffected.

---

Policy Underpinning Spontaneous Desistance

The principle of spontaneous desistance reflects the humanitarian policy of the penal system. By allowing individuals the opportunity to abandon criminal intent without penal consequence, the law promotes rehabilitation over punishment. It recognizes:

• The possibility of moral recovery.
• The importance of preventing harm over punishing mere intent.

---

Summary

1. Spontaneous desistance occurs when an offender voluntarily abandons their criminal intent before completing acts of execution.
2. It negates liability for attempted felonies, provided:
   • The desistance is voluntary.
   • No external factors compelled the abandonment.
   • The desistance occurs before the felony reaches the attempted stage.
3. Exceptions apply to preparatory acts that are independently punishable.
4. Jurisprudence underscores the importance of voluntariness and timeliness in evaluating desistance.

The doctrine is an essential mechanism in criminal law, balancing deterrence with fairness by incentivizing offenders to abandon criminal acts.