Overt Acts | Stages of Execution | Felonies | REVISED PENAL CODE – BOOK ONE

CRIMINAL LAW > REVISED PENAL CODE – BOOK ONE > FELONIES > STAGES OF EXECUTION > OVERT ACTS

The concept of overt acts is essential in determining the stages of execution of a felony under the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines (RPC). It relates to the progression from mere criminal intent to the actual perpetration of the offense, determining liability based on the stage reached by the offender.

---

1. Definition of Overt Acts

• Overt act refers to an external, concrete manifestation of intent to commit a felony. It is an essential element in distinguishing between the preparatory and executable stages of a crime.
• An overt act must directly or unequivocally lead to the commission of the crime, even if the crime is not ultimately consummated.

Characteristics of an Overt Act:

1. Tangible: The act must be perceptible and not merely internal or conceptual (e.g., thoughts or plans).
2. Unambiguous: The act must clearly indicate the intent to commit a felony.
3. Causal Connection: There must be a direct link between the overt act and the intended offense.
4. Irrevocable Progression: The act must move beyond preparation and enter the realm of execution.

---

2. Stages of Execution

The stages of execution under the Revised Penal Code are:

1. Attempted
2. Frustrated
3. Consummated

The role of overt acts differs in each stage:

a. Attempted Stage

• In this stage, the offender begins the commission of a felony directly by overt acts, but the crime is not achieved due to reasons independent of their will.
• Example: In homicide, drawing a weapon and attempting to stab the victim constitutes an overt act of execution.

Elements of Attempted Felony:

1. Commencement: The offender has started to execute the intended crime.
2. Direct Participation: The overt act demonstrates intent to commit the felony.
3. Non-Completion: The crime is not consummated because of an extraneous reason.

b. Frustrated Stage

• The felony is committed when the offender has performed all acts necessary for the execution of the crime but the result is not achieved due to reasons beyond their control.
• Example: In homicide, stabbing the victim with the intent to kill, but the victim survives due to timely medical intervention.

Elements of Frustrated Felony:

1. Completion of Acts: The offender has performed all acts required to produce the intended crime.
2. Non-Accomplishment of Crime: The felony does not materialize due to external circumstances (e.g., medical intervention or failure of the intended action).

c. Consummated Stage

• In this stage, the felony is fully executed with all its elements present, leading to the intended result.
• Example: In homicide, the act of stabbing and successfully killing the victim completes the crime.

---

3. Overlap with Criminal Intent and Preparatory Acts

• Overt acts differ from criminal intent and preparatory acts:
  • Criminal Intent: This is the internal determination to commit a felony, which is not punishable unless accompanied by overt acts.
  • Preparatory Acts: Actions that lay the groundwork for a crime (e.g., buying poison with the intent to kill). These are generally not punishable, except when covered by special laws (e.g., conspiracy or proposal under specific crimes like treason, rebellion, or terrorism).

---

4. Requisites for an Overt Act

To qualify as an overt act under criminal law, the following requisites must be met:

1. Intent to Commit the Crime: The act must be preceded by a clear criminal intent or motive.
2. Manifestation: The act must be visible and detectable to others.
3. Tendency to Produce the Felony: The act must directly contribute to the accomplishment of the criminal purpose.

---

5. Examples of Overt Acts

• In Theft: Cutting the wires of a surveillance system to gain access to property.
• In Arson: Pouring gasoline on a structure and striking a match.
• In Murder: Pointing a gun at a victim and pulling the trigger (even if it misfires).

---

6. Special Notes on Overt Acts

a. Conspiracy and Proposal

• Under Article 8 of the Revised Penal Code, mere conspiracy or proposal to commit a felony is not punishable, except in specific crimes (e.g., treason, rebellion, or coup d’état).
• However, once an overt act occurs in furtherance of the conspiracy, all conspirators may be liable for the same stage of execution.

b. Continuity of Acts

• When determining the stage of execution, acts must be viewed in their entirety, not in isolation. A sequence of acts may collectively amount to an overt act, even if individual actions seem preparatory.

c. Acts Done in Error

• An overt act done under a mistaken belief or error in object (e.g., shooting the wrong person) may still constitute an attempted or frustrated felony.

---

7. Legal Principles and Jurisprudence

a. People v. Lizada (G.R. No. 232160)

• Held that the overt act must lead directly to the commission of the felony and not merely be preparatory.

b. People v. Lamahang (G.R. No. L-3047)

• Emphasized that an overt act demonstrates the commencement of execution and must be unequivocally related to the crime intended.

c. People v. Dungo (G.R. No. 209464)

• Clarified the distinction between preparatory acts (not punishable) and overt acts (punishable in attempted crimes).

---

8. Summary

• Overt acts bridge the gap between intention and actual execution of a crime.
• The stage of execution depends on the offender's progress in performing acts necessary to achieve the criminal result.
• Liability is determined by the presence, clarity, and direction of the overt act toward the commission of the felony.

Understanding overt acts ensures accurate application of the law and fair determination of criminal liability in varying stages of execution.

Attempted, Frustrated, and Consummated Stages | Stages of Execution | Felonies | REVISED PENAL CODE – BOOK ONE

ATTEMPTED, FRUSTRATED, AND CONSUMMATED STAGES OF FELONIES

Under Criminal Law, Revised Penal Code (RPC), Book One, Felonies

The stages of execution in criminal law delineate the progress of a criminal act from its inception to its completion. Article 6 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC) categorizes the stages of a felony into attempted, frustrated, and consummated stages, which are essential for determining the criminal liability and corresponding penalties.

---

1. Attempted Stage

Definition:

• A felony is in the attempted stage when the offender begins the commission of a felony by overt acts but does not perform all the acts of execution which should produce the felony by reason of some cause or accident other than the offender’s spontaneous desistance.

Key Elements:

1. The offender commences the commission of the crime.
2. There are overt acts manifesting an intention to commit a particular felony.
3. The offender fails to complete all the acts of execution.
4. The failure is not due to the offender’s voluntary desistance but is due to an independent cause or external interruption.

Examples:

• A person fires a gun intending to kill but misses the target.
• A burglar enters a house intending to steal but is interrupted before taking anything.

Note on Desistance:

• If the offender voluntarily desists from further acts that would consummate the felony, there is no criminal liability for the felony attempted (Article 6, RPC). However, liability may arise for other crimes already committed.

---

2. Frustrated Stage

Definition:

• A felony is in the frustrated stage when the offender performs all the acts of execution necessary to produce the felony but the felony is not consummated due to causes independent of the offender’s will.

Key Elements:

1. The offender has performed all the acts of execution.
2. The acts performed are sufficient to produce the intended felony under normal circumstances.
3. The felony is not produced due to external factors beyond the offender’s control.

Examples:

• A person stabs a victim intending to kill, but the victim survives because of timely medical intervention.
• A thief successfully takes valuables but is caught before being able to escape with them.

Important Distinction:

• In frustrated felonies, the offender has completed the criminal act, but some intervening cause prevents the desired result.

---

3. Consummated Stage

Definition:

• A felony is consummated when all the elements necessary for the accomplishment of the felony are present.

Key Elements:

1. The offender performs all acts of execution.
2. The intended felony is fully accomplished.

Examples:

• A person shoots and kills the victim as intended.
• A thief successfully steals an item and escapes without interruption.

---

Legal Basis

Article 6, RPC explicitly defines the stages of execution:

• “Consummated felonies are those in which all the elements necessary for their execution and accomplishment are present;
• Frustrated felonies are those in which the offender performs all the acts of execution which would produce the felony as a consequence but which, nevertheless, do not produce it by reason of causes independent of the will of the perpetrator;
• Attempted felonies are those in which the offender commences the commission of a felony directly by overt acts, and does not perform all the acts of execution which should produce the felony by reason of some cause or accident other than his own spontaneous desistance.”

---

Important Doctrines and Clarifications

1. Overt Acts:

   • Acts that directly tend to produce the crime and are part of the actual execution of the felony.
   • Mere preparatory acts are not considered overt acts.

2. Independent Cause:

   • In both attempted and frustrated felonies, failure to achieve the result must be due to external factors or an independent cause.

3. Intent to Commit a Felony:

   • The offender’s intent must be clear. Without intent to commit a felony, no criminal liability arises.

4. Impossible Crimes:

   • Crimes that cannot be consummated due to the inherent impossibility of accomplishment or the inadequacy of means are governed under Article 4(2) and are distinct from the stages of execution.

5. Penalty Application:

   • Attempted Stage: Penalty is two degrees lower than that prescribed for the consummated felony.
   • Frustrated Stage: Penalty is one degree lower than that prescribed for the consummated felony.
   • Consummated Stage: Full penalty prescribed by law is imposed.

---

Judicial Interpretations

1. People v. Orita (1985):

   • Held that for a crime to be in the frustrated stage, there must be a clear showing that all acts of execution were performed and would normally result in the crime but for an independent cause.

2. US v. Eduave (1912):

   • Clarified that acts preparatory to the commission of a crime are not sufficient to constitute an attempted felony.

3. People v. Lamahang (1937):

   • Distinguished frustrated murder from attempted murder by focusing on whether the victim’s death was prevented by factors beyond the offender’s control.

---

Application to Specific Crimes

• Crimes Against Persons:

  • Clear stages are observable (e.g., attempted murder, frustrated murder, consummated murder).

• Crimes Against Property:

  • The theft is consummated once the offender has full control and possession of the property, even if only momentarily.

• Crimes Requiring Result:

  • In felonies like arson or homicide, the frustrated stage depends on the result being prevented by external factors despite complete execution.

---

Conclusion

Understanding the stages of execution—attempted, frustrated, and consummated—is essential for determining the appropriate liability and penalty under the RPC. Each stage requires a careful examination of the offender’s actions, the external circumstances, and the specific legal requirements of the felony charged.

Spontaneous Desistance | Stages of Execution | Felonies | REVISED PENAL CODE – BOOK ONE

Spontaneous Desistance in Criminal Law

Under the Revised Penal Code (RPC) of the Philippines, the concept of spontaneous desistance pertains to the doctrine that addresses the liability of an offender when they voluntarily stop or desist from completing a criminal act. This principle plays a significant role in determining whether criminal liability attaches at certain stages of execution.

---

Stages of Execution

In criminal law, felonies are classified into consummated, frustrated, and attempted stages, depending on the degree of execution. These stages define whether an act is punishable and to what extent.

1. Consummated Stage: The felony is completed, and all the elements necessary for its execution and accomplishment are present.

2. Frustrated Stage: The offender performs all acts of execution that would result in the commission of the felony, but it is not consummated due to causes independent of the offender's will.

3. Attempted Stage: The offender begins to commit a felony by overt acts but does not perform all the acts of execution due to reasons other than the offender's spontaneous desistance.

---

Definition of Spontaneous Desistance

Spontaneous desistance refers to the voluntary and deliberate abandonment of the criminal purpose by the offender after beginning the commission of a felony but before all the acts of execution are performed. When spontaneous desistance occurs, the offender is not criminally liable for the attempted felony because the act has not yet reached the stage where it constitutes a punishable offense under the law.

---

Key Characteristics of Spontaneous Desistance

1. Voluntariness:

   • The desistance must be purely voluntary and not due to external causes or forces. For instance, if the offender stops because of fear of being caught or due to intervention by another person, it is not spontaneous.

2. Timeliness:

   • The desistance must occur before the completion of all acts of execution. If all acts necessary to commit the felony have already been performed, desistance will not absolve the offender of liability.

3. Absence of External Factors:

   • The decision to abandon the criminal purpose must be entirely the result of the offender’s own volition, without coercion or any external compulsion.

---

Legal Effect of Spontaneous Desistance

When an offender desists spontaneously:

1. No Criminal Liability for Attempt:

   • Since the act has not reached the point of an attempted felony, the offender is not liable under the law.
   • The rationale is that the legal system aims to encourage desistance to prevent the commission of crimes.

2. Exceptions:

   • If preparatory acts already constitute an independent crime, the offender may still be liable for such an offense. For example:
     • Acts of conspiracy or proposal to commit a felony, when expressly penalized (e.g., Article 115 on conspiracy to commit treason), remain punishable.
     • Possession of illegal firearms or other preparatory acts that are separately criminalized will not be absolved by desistance.

---

Application in Specific Crimes

The doctrine of spontaneous desistance is most relevant to intentional felonies and crimes requiring a specific criminal intent (dolus). It does not apply to:

1. Crimes of Negligence or Recklessness:
   • Since these offenses do not involve intent, desistance is irrelevant.
2. Crimes with General Criminal Intent:
   • In certain crimes like homicide, once acts of execution commence, desistance is no longer relevant to liability.

---

Jurisprudence on Spontaneous Desistance

The Supreme Court of the Philippines has consistently emphasized the principle of spontaneous desistance as a safeguard to ensure that individuals are not unduly punished for mere intentions. Key rulings have clarified the boundaries:

1. People v. Lizada (G.R. No. L-46528):

   • This case emphasized that desistance must occur prior to the completion of acts leading to the attempted stage. It also underscored voluntariness as an essential element.

2. People v. Lamahang (G.R. No. L-28133):

   • The Court held that a voluntary act of abandonment negates liability at the attempted stage but reiterated that preparatory acts punishable as separate crimes are unaffected.

---

Policy Underpinning Spontaneous Desistance

The principle of spontaneous desistance reflects the humanitarian policy of the penal system. By allowing individuals the opportunity to abandon criminal intent without penal consequence, the law promotes rehabilitation over punishment. It recognizes:

• The possibility of moral recovery.
• The importance of preventing harm over punishing mere intent.

---

Summary

1. Spontaneous desistance occurs when an offender voluntarily abandons their criminal intent before completing acts of execution.
2. It negates liability for attempted felonies, provided:
   • The desistance is voluntary.
   • No external factors compelled the abandonment.
   • The desistance occurs before the felony reaches the attempted stage.
3. Exceptions apply to preparatory acts that are independently punishable.
4. Jurisprudence underscores the importance of voluntariness and timeliness in evaluating desistance.

The doctrine is an essential mechanism in criminal law, balancing deterrence with fairness by incentivizing offenders to abandon criminal acts.

Subjective Phase and Objective Phase | Stages of Execution | Felonies | REVISED PENAL CODE – BOOK ONE

Subjective Phase and Objective Phase in the Stages of Execution (Criminal Law – Revised Penal Code Book One)

In criminal law, the subjective phase and objective phase are critical concepts in determining the liability of a person in the stages of execution of felonies under the Revised Penal Code (RPC) of the Philippines. These phases differentiate the acts of the offender during the commission of a felony and help establish whether criminal liability arises at certain stages of execution.

---

I. The Stages of Execution

The stages of execution refer to the progression of acts committed by the offender in the commission of a felony. These stages include:

1. Attempted stage – The offender commences the commission of a felony directly by overt acts but does not perform all the acts of execution due to an independent cause.
2. Frustrated stage – The offender performs all the acts of execution necessary to produce the felony, but the felony is not produced due to causes independent of the offender’s will.
3. Consummated stage – The felony is produced as a result of the offender's acts.

---

II. Subjective Phase

Definition

The subjective phase refers to the portion of the execution of the felony starting from the commencement of overt acts up to the point where the offender still has control over the execution of the acts.

Key Characteristics

1. Scope of the Subjective Phase:

   • It begins with the commission of overt acts by the offender.
   • It ends when the offender loses control over the execution of the crime, typically when external forces intervene or when the intended outcome becomes inevitable.

2. Control by the Offender:

   • The offender's acts are still volitional, meaning they are within his power to stop or continue.

3. Application in the Attempted Stage:

   • The subjective phase is most relevant in the attempted stage of execution.
   • If the offender is stopped or desists voluntarily during the subjective phase, criminal liability may not attach, as there is no attempted felony.

4. No Felony Yet Produced:

   • Since the felony is still within the offender's control, it has not yet been produced, nor have all acts of execution been performed.

---

III. Objective Phase

Definition

The objective phase refers to the portion of the execution of the felony after the offender loses control over its completion and external forces take over.

Key Characteristics

1. Completion of Overt Acts:

   • The offender has already performed all the acts of execution necessary to bring about the intended felony.

2. Loss of Control by the Offender:

   • The offender no longer has the ability to stop the commission of the felony because the acts performed have set in motion the effects that lead to the crime.

3. Relevance in Frustrated and Consummated Stages:

   • The objective phase is critical in determining whether the felony has reached the frustrated stage (where the felony is not produced due to independent causes) or the consummated stage (where the intended felony is achieved).

---

IV. Importance of the Subjective and Objective Phases in Criminal Liability

1. Determining Criminal Liability:

   • The distinction between these phases helps identify the stage of execution at which the offender must be held criminally liable.
   • If an offender is stopped during the subjective phase (attempted stage), liability may be for attempted felony, provided there is an overt act.

2. Application to Specific Felonies:

   • In crimes requiring specific intent (e.g., theft, homicide), the subjective phase is particularly significant in assessing the offender's mental state and volition.

3. Acts Independent of the Offender's Will:

   • When external or independent causes prevent the commission of a felony during the objective phase, the liability shifts to the frustrated stage.

4. Impossible Crimes and Desistance:

   • If the offender voluntarily desists during the subjective phase, criminal liability may be extinguished, except in impossible crimes (e.g., Art. 4, RPC).

---

V. Jurisprudential Application

The Supreme Court of the Philippines has elucidated the importance of subjective and objective phases in several cases. Notable principles include:

1. People v. Lizada:

   • Distinguished the attempted stage from the frustrated stage based on the completion of overt acts and the production of the intended felony.

2. People v. Orita:

   • Clarified that an attempted felony occurs when acts of execution are commenced but are not completed due to reasons outside the offender's control, within the subjective phase.

3. People v. Villacorta:

   • Emphasized that in frustrated felonies, the offender has passed the subjective phase, and external forces prevent the felony’s consummation.

---

VI. Practical Implications

1. Prosecutorial Role:

   • Prosecutors must establish where the offender’s acts fall within the subjective and objective phases to accurately charge and prosecute the offense.

2. Defense Strategies:

   • Defense counsel may argue lack of overt acts or voluntary desistance during the subjective phase to reduce or negate liability.

3. Judicial Determination:

   • Courts must evaluate the evidence to determine whether the offender’s acts remained in the subjective phase or crossed into the objective phase.

---

The distinction between the subjective and objective phases is vital for understanding criminal liability in the stages of execution under the Revised Penal Code. Proper analysis ensures that justice is equitably administered based on the offender’s conduct and intent.

Stages of Execution | Felonies | REVISED PENAL CODE – BOOK ONE

Stages of Execution in Criminal Law (Article 6, Revised Penal Code, Philippines)

The stages of execution in criminal law are explicitly outlined in Article 6 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC). These stages refer to the phases a crime undergoes before it is consummated. Understanding these stages is crucial for determining the liability of the offender, the appropriate penalties, and whether the offender’s acts constitute an attempt, frustration, or consummation of the crime.

---

1. Enumerated Stages of Execution

a. Attempted Stage

• Definition: A felony is in the attempted stage when the offender begins the commission of a felony directly by overt acts but does not perform all the acts of execution that should produce the felony due to causes other than his/her own voluntary desistance.
• Key Elements:
  1. The offender commences the commission of the felony by overt acts.
  2. The offender does not perform all the acts of execution that should produce the felony.
  3. The offender’s failure to complete the acts is due to causes independent of his/her will (e.g., outside intervention, fortuitous events).
• Characteristics:
  • Mere preparatory acts do not qualify as an attempt; there must be an overt act directly related to the crime.
  • Voluntary desistance (i.e., the offender stops on their own accord) negates the attempted stage.

---

b. Frustrated Stage

• Definition: A felony is frustrated when the offender performs all the acts of execution which would produce the felony as a consequence but the felony is not produced due to causes independent of the offender’s will.
• Key Elements:
  1. The offender performs all the acts of execution necessary to produce the felony.
  2. The felony’s intended result is not accomplished.
  3. The failure of the felony to materialize is due to causes beyond the offender’s control.
• Characteristics:
  • There must be a clear intent to commit the crime, and all requisite acts to complete it must have been performed.
  • The prevention of the consummation must be external, such as medical intervention in a frustrated homicide.

---

c. Consummated Stage

• Definition: A felony is consummated when all the elements necessary for its execution and accomplishment are present.
• Key Elements:
  1. The offender performs all acts required for the execution of the felony.
  2. The intended result of the felony materializes.
• Characteristics:
  • This is the point at which the crime is fully executed.
  • The consummated stage carries the highest degree of criminal liability.

---

2. Overt Acts Defined

An overt act is an external act that indicates the offender has begun to execute the felony. It must:

• Be manifestly intentional and not merely preparatory.
• Be a direct step toward the execution of the felony.

---

3. Distinctions Between the Stages

Stage	Acts Performed by Offender	Result of the Crime	Cause of Failure (if applicable)
Attempted	Commences the crime but does not complete all acts of execution.	Crime does not materialize.	Causes independent of the offender’s will.
Frustrated	Performs all acts of execution.	Crime does not materialize.	Causes independent of the offender’s will.
Consummated	Performs all acts of execution.	Crime is accomplished.	Not applicable.

---

4. Relevance to Criminal Liability

• The stage of execution affects the penalty imposed:
  • Attempted Stage: Lesser penalty due to incomplete execution.
  • Frustrated Stage: Higher than the attempted stage, but still less than consummated.
  • Consummated Stage: Full penalty for the crime.
• Exceptions: Some crimes do not admit frustrated or attempted stages. For instance:
  • Formal Crimes: Libel or false testimony, which are consummated upon completion of the act (e.g., publication of libelous material).
  • Crimes of Mere Attempt: Trespass or possession of illegal drugs, where mere possession suffices to consummate the crime.
  • Impossible Crimes: These involve acts that could not produce the crime due to inherent impossibility, such as trying to kill someone already dead.

---

5. Additional Considerations

a. Indispensable Acts vs. Preparatory Acts

• Preparatory Acts: Do not constitute an overt act and are not punishable unless covered by specific laws (e.g., conspiracy to commit rebellion).
• Indispensable Acts: Directly lead to the crime’s execution and qualify as overt acts.

b. Voluntary Desistance

• Voluntary cessation of criminal intent absolves liability for an attempted crime.
• However, desistance does not absolve the offender if a felony has already been consummated.

c. Legal Doctrines and Jurisprudence

• Courts apply the proximate cause doctrine to determine liability in frustrated crimes.
• People v. Lizada (G.R. No. L-45244): Clarified the distinction between preparatory and overt acts.
• People v. Almonte (G.R. No. L-39090): Established criteria for frustrated stages in complex crimes.

---

6. Practical Application

For practitioners, understanding the stages of execution is vital for:

• Case Analysis: Assessing the stage of execution helps determine the appropriate charge and penalties.
• Defense Strategies: Highlighting voluntary desistance or absence of overt acts can reduce liability.
• Prosecution Arguments: Establishing overt acts and their nexus to the intended crime is key to securing a conviction.

By mastering the nuances of Article 6, lawyers can effectively navigate the complexities of criminal liability under the Revised Penal Code.