Occupation | Different Modes of Acquiring Ownership | PROPERTY, OWNERSHIP, AND ITS MODIFICATIONS

CIVIL LAW: IX. PROPERTY, OWNERSHIP, AND ITS MODIFICATIONS

C. Different Modes of Acquiring Ownership > 1. Occupation


Occupation, as a mode of acquiring ownership, is governed by Article 712 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, which provides that ownership is acquired by occupation, intellectual creation, law, donation, succession, and certain contracts. Among these, occupation is the original method of acquiring ownership over things that are res nullius or not owned by anyone.


Key Elements of Occupation

Occupation requires the following elements:

  1. Appropriation: The individual must take material possession of the thing with the intent to acquire ownership.
  2. Res Nullius: The object of appropriation must not belong to anyone at the time of occupation.
  3. Capacity to Acquire Ownership: The person must have the legal capacity to own property.
  4. Compliance with Law: The act of occupation must be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

Objects Susceptible to Occupation

  1. Movable Property:
    • Wild Animals: Per Article 713, ownership is acquired by hunting or capturing animals in their natural state. This right is subject to limitations under special laws, such as wildlife conservation statutes.
      • Example: The Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act (Republic Act No. 9147) regulates the capture of endangered species.
    • Lost Movables (Treasure Trove):
      • Treasure Trove: Under Article 438, hidden treasure consists of any hidden money, jewelry, or other precious objects, the ownership of which does not appear.
        • The finder of hidden treasure acquires 50% ownership if discovered on another person’s property with consent, unless otherwise agreed upon.
        • If found on one’s own property, the owner retains full ownership.
    • Abandoned Property: Movable property intentionally abandoned by the owner may be acquired through occupation.
  2. Immovable Property:
    • Land: Land cannot generally be acquired by occupation, except in rare cases under specific laws, such as the Public Land Act (Commonwealth Act No. 141), which governs free patent applications for public lands.

Limitations on Occupation

  1. Public Domain: Articles 419-420 specify that property of public domain, such as rivers, lakes, and forests, cannot be appropriated unless expressly authorized by law.
  2. Special Laws: Laws regulating natural resources (e.g., the Mining Act, Forestry Code) limit occupation to prevent the exploitation of resources.
  3. Environmental Concerns: Occupation of wildlife and natural resources must comply with environmental regulations to preserve biodiversity and prevent illegal exploitation.

Jurisprudence on Occupation

  • Valenton v. Murciano (1903): The Supreme Court clarified that occupation applies to objects that are ownerless by nature (res nullius) or by abandonment. The court stressed the need for intent and physical possession to establish ownership.
  • Cariño v. Insular Government (1909): Recognized the indigenous occupation and use of ancestral lands as a means of acquiring ownership under customary laws.

Applications and Restrictions

  1. Indigenous Practices: Occupation recognizes indigenous peoples’ rights under Republic Act No. 8371 (Indigenous Peoples' Rights Act), allowing ownership of ancestral domains and lands occupied since time immemorial.
  2. Regulated Occupation:
    • Fishing Rights: Fishing in public waters may be subject to local ordinances and fisheries laws.
    • Hunting and Gathering: Specific licenses or permits may be required to occupy or collect natural resources.

Comparative Analysis

  1. Occupation in Philippine Context:
    • Predominantly applies to wild animals, abandoned movables, and hidden treasures.
    • Heavily regulated by special laws to ensure public interest and resource sustainability.
  2. Occupation in International Law:
    • Similar to the principle of occupation under Roman Law and other civil law jurisdictions.
    • Recognizes the acquisition of ownership by first possession or capture, with adjustments for contemporary issues like environmental conservation.

Conclusion

Occupation remains a fundamental, albeit limited, method of acquiring ownership in the Philippine legal system. While it is rooted in traditional property concepts, modern statutory frameworks and jurisprudence have imposed stringent requirements and limitations to ensure alignment with public policy, environmental sustainability, and respect for indigenous rights.

Disclaimer: This content is not legal advice and may involve AI assistance. Information may be inaccurate.